|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Baram, Degene, Amin, and Smaldone), and the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Dr. Bilfinger), State University of New YorkStony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
Correspondence to: Daniel Baram, MD, FCCP, Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, SUNY-Stony Brook, T-17 040 HSC, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8172; e-mail: daniel.baram{at}stonybrook.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
His dyspnea had been progressive over many years and was refractory to adjustments in his cardiac medications. A recent nuclear stress test showed reversible ischemia. He had a 20-year history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus with progressive nephropathy and retinopathy. He had a 100 pack-year smoking history and a remote asbestos exposure as a member of the Merchant Marine. Outpatient medications were rosiglitazone, 4 mg qd, quinapril, 10 mg qd, carvedilol, 6.25 mg bid, torsemide, 100 mg qd, metolazone, 5 mg qd, and timolol ophthalmic drops.
Cardiac catheterization revealed two-vessel coronary artery disease. Left ventricular pressures were as follows: systolic, 141 mm Hg; diastolic, 15 mm Hg; and end-diastolic, 20 mm Hg. The performance of a ventriculogram was deferred secondary to renal insufficiency. An echocardiogram demonstrated preserved left ventricular systolic function with normal chamber size and wall thickness. There was right atrial and ventricular enlargement, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure was estimated to be 30 mm Hg. Coronary stents were placed into the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries.
Several hours after undergoing the procedure, the patients dyspnea worsened, and he required reintubation. Prior to intubation, arterial blood gas levels while breathing room air were as follows: pH, 7.20; PCO2, 78 mm Hg; PO2, 49 mm Hg; bicarbonate, 30 mm Hg; and oxygen saturation, 73%. He was admitted to the coronary care unit. His ECG was unchanged from baseline. Pulmonary edema secondary to procedural hydration was suspected. He did not improve despite aggressive diuresis, and a pulmonary consultation was requested.
Physical Examination
The patient was intubated and sedated. Vital signs revealed a BP of 96/57 mm Hg, a pulse of 66 beats/min, a temperature of 98.9°F, and a respiratory rate of 14 breaths/min. His neck veins were not engorged, although prominent pulsations were visible. A lung examination showed bilateral coarse crackles. He had a normal chest wall without evidence of kyphoscoliosis. A cardiovascular examination revealed a loud S2 and a systolic ejection murmur III/VI. The results of an abdominal examination were unremarkable. His lower extremities showed 2+ edema. The results of a neurologic examination were normal without muscle weakness or focal deficit. His fingers did not demonstrate clubbing.
The patient was receiving continuous mandatory mechanical ventilation with a set tidal volume (VT) of 700 mL, a set respiration rate of 10 breaths/min, and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 56 cm H2O, plateau pressure (Pplat) was 48 cm H2O. VT was lowered to 550 mL, resulting in a PIP of 45 cm H2O and a Pplat of 42 cm H2O. Static compliance of the respiratory system (Cstat,rs) was 15 mL/cm H2O.
Radiology
A chest radiograph demonstrated increased markings throughout both lungs fields (but more prominently at the bases), cardiomegaly, and bilateral pleural effusions, with the left being larger than the right (Fig 1
). These findings were essentially unchanged from those of radiographs taken 1 year prior to hospital admission.
|
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Data
A pulmonary artery catheter was placed. Waveform tracings were recorded (Fig 2
), and the following measurements made: cardiac output, 3.9 L/min; cardiac index, 2.0 L/min/m2; central venous pressure (CVP), 2 mm Hg; pulmonary artery pressure, 49/22 mm Hg; and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), 8 mm Hg.
|
2. Which diagnostic/therapeutic procedure is indicated?
Answer: Cause of respiratory failure is chest wall restriction
A marked rise on the PAOP waveform during inspiration and a low Cstat,rs strongly implicate an abnormality of the chest wall. As the thoracic cage had no gross deformity, pleural disease was suspected. A chest CT scan demonstrated loculated pleural effusions and pleural thickening without calcification. (Fig 3 ). An exploratory thoracotomy revealed a fusion of the visceral and parietal pleura resulting in severe restriction of the lung.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Parenchymal lung disease is the cause of low Cstat,rs in most patients with acute respiratory failure. However, abnormalities of the chest wall are common in patients with chronic respiratory failure. Chest wall disease is usually overt on physical examination or chest radiography (eg, morbid obesity, kyphoscoliosis, or pleural effusions). The relationship of Cstat,rs to static lung compliance (Cstat,lung) and static chest wall compliance (Cstat,chest wall) is as follows: 1/Cstat,rs = 1 / Cstat,lung + 1/Cstat,chest wall.
During mechanical ventilation, the extent that alveolar pressure is transmitted to the pleura is determined by the elasticity of the lung and chest wall. The index of transmission (IT), which is calculated as (end-inspiratory pleural pressure end-expiratory pleural pressure)/(Pplat PEEP), is equal to (Cstat,lung)/(Cstat,lung + Cstat,chest wall). IT is normally 50%, as the lung and chest wall have similar static compliance at functional residual capacity. Patients with stiff lungs have less transmission and a lower IT, and patients with a stiff chest wall have more transmission and a higher IT.
An IT of alveolar pressure to the PAOP (IT,PAOP) also can be calculated, as follows: IT,PAOP =(end-inspiratory PAOP [PAOPend-inspiratory] end-expiratory PAOP [PAOPend-expiratory])/(Pplat PEEP). When a pulmonary artery catheter balloon is inflated, there is no flow distal to the balloon. PAOPend-expiratory equals left atrial pressure in the absence of PEEP. PAOP rises during mechanical ventilation. PAOPend-inspiratory is dependent on Pplat and on the degree of pressure transmission across the pulmonary vasculature. The extent of transmission is proportional to Cstat,lung. The concordance between IT and IT,PAOP has not been fully evaluated.
Using the data from Figure 2, top, pressure of 25 mm Hg (PAOPend-inspiratory, 34 mm Hg; PAOPend-expiratory, 9 mm Hg) was transmitted to the vasculature by a mechanical breath that raised the alveolar pressure by 37 cm H2O (Pplat, 42 cm H2O; PEEP, 5 cm H2O). Using the conversion of 1.34 cm H2O = 1 mm Hg, IT,PAOP was 91% (ie, 25 mm Hg x 1.34/37 cm H2O). This is consistent with a normal Cstat,lung. The reduction in Cstat,rs therefore must be explained by a severely reduced Cstat,chest wall.
Care must be taken regarding the definition of the terms lung and chest wall. Generally, the thorax is considered to be a single compartment. The increase in lung volume during inspiration affects other intrathoracic structures. Compliant intrathoracic structures are compressed and transmit a rise in pressure.
This patients pleura were fused, and his pleural space was obliterated. During inspiration, an expanding lung would only compress those structures within the encircling band of extraparenchymal fibrosis. The high IT,PAOP seen in the pulmonary artery tracing during balloon occlusion was due to compression of the downstream pulmonary vasculature. CVP, right ventricular pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure mirrored the inspiratory rise in PAOP (Fig 2), suggesting that the heart and great vessels were similarly compressed by lung inflation. At autopsy, the parietal pericardium was fused tightly to the pleura. Structures outside the fibrotic pleura were not compressed by lung inflation and would not be expected to transmit a rise in pressure. In this patient, IT calculated using esophageal pressure would likely have been very low as the esophagus was outside the pleural fibrosis at autopsy.
CVP monitoring is commonly performed in the ICU and provides very useful information. CVP has been shown to be more predictive than PAOP in predicting fluid responsiveness, and the importance of CVP in assessing cardiac function has been stressed. In this patient, the proper interpretation of the large inspiratory swings in CVP with mechanical ventilation would have argued strongly against pulmonary edema by demonstrating a normal Cstat,lung.
Pleural thickening and fibrosis can occur from infection, radiation, trauma, connective tissue diseases, drugs, malignancy, and asbestos exposure. Asbestos is the most common cause of bilateral pleural fibrosis and is the most likely agent to cause restrictive impairment in the absence of significant radiologic evidence. Cryptogenic bilateral pleural fibrosis has been reported in four patients without asbestos exposure who presented with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and chest pain, and responded to therapy with corticosteroids. An inflammatory cause for the condition was postulated.
Patients with bilateral fibrothorax may develop hypercapnic respiratory failure, cor pulmonale, and pulmonary hypertension. The highly negative pleural pressure causes transudative effusions in areas in which the pleura are not fused. Diffuse pleural thickening should be considered if (1) there is a smooth uninterrupted pleural opacity over at least one quarter of the chest wall or (2) pleural thickening extends > 8 cm craniocaudally and 5 cm laterally, and is 3 mm thick. Pulmonary function testing reveals reduced lung volumes that are consistent with restrictive dysfunction.
Thoracotomy with pleurectomy is recommended for treatment, provided there is a plane of separation between the visceral pleura and adjacent lung. Although a clinical response to decortication has been reported, the morbidity and mortality of this procedure is high, and patients have significant residual restrictive dysfunction. When the peel is adherent such that no tissue plane can be developed, subpleural resection has been proposed, provided that a limited surface area is involved. Others have proposed crisscross, grid-like incisions allowing the lung to expand with limited success. One series reported a benefit from long-term noninvasive mechanical ventilation for patients with hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency from asbestos-related pleural fibrosis.
| Clinical Pearls |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. In patients with chest wall diseases, there is a high transmission of alveolar pressure to the pulmonary vasculature, resulting in dramatic pulmonary artery pressure swings during inspiration. In patients with parenchymal diseases, the transmission is attenuated.
3. A careful interpretation of hemodynamic and physiologic data is essential in the evaluation and management of critically ill patients. An analysis of hemodynamic waveforms provides useful information above and beyond the filling pressure.
4. In patients with asbestos-related pleural fibrosis, the radiographic findings can be subtle even when the process is sufficient to cause hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Received for publication November 6, 2003. Accepted for publication January 20, 2004.
| Suggested Reading |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |