|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Drs. Bolotin, de Perini, Frolkis, Lev-Ran, Nesher, and Uretzky), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv; and The Bruce Rappaport School of Medicine (Mr. Domany), the Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Correspondence to: Gil Bolotin, MD, PhD, The Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St, Tel-Aviv, 64239, Israel; e-mail: bolotin{at}tasmc.health.gov.il
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: After undergoing a mid-sternotomy for CABG, 105 patients underwent EAUS with an 8-MHz transducer ordinarily used for conventional transthoracic echocardiography. The surgical strategy was decided on at three stages: preoperatively, after manual aortic palpation, and following EAUS.
Results: The preoperative strategy had assigned 105 patients to the "touched aorta" group that was planned for either on-pump or off-pump CABG (OPCAB) with proximal anastomosis to the aorta. Pathologic lesions of the atheromatotic ascending aorta were evident in 40 patients (38%), with the lesions detected in 22 patients (21%) by both palpation and EAUS, and in 18 patients (17%) by EAUS alone. The planned surgical strategy was changed in 29 patients (28%): 25 patients (24%) were converted from on-pump CABG to OPCAB, and the EAUS influenced the choice of the aortic cannulation, cross-clamping, and proximal anastomosis site in 4 patients (4%). Among the changes in surgical decision making, changes in 11 patients (10%) were based on lesion detection by both manual palpation and EAUS; in 18 patients (17%), changes resulted from pathologic evidence provided by EAUS alone.
Conclusions: This study showed EAUS to be more sensitive in detecting atherosclerotic lesions than manual intraoperative palpation of the ascending aorta. This investigation contributes new data on the effect of EAUS on intraoperative surgical approach in the era of OPCAB. The use of EAUS has emerged as an important tool in intraoperative decision making, and we recommend its use routinely in CABG procedures.
Key Words: cerebrovascular accident coronary artery bypass epiaortic ultrasound
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuroprotection is becoming an increasingly important consideration in the adoption of new methods and the equipment used in cardiac surgery.4 Recent developments of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and total arterial revascularization without clamping the aorta were shown by several investigators56 to offer new opportunities of neuroprotection. We hypothesized that intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonography (EAUS) would supplement visual information to that derived from manual aortic palpation and, consequently, influence and refine the selection of the appropriate surgical strategy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient Selection and Preoperative Surgical Decision-Making Protocol
The study was conducted during 1 operative day every week through the 13-month period, and thus the study cohort represents a random 20% of our patient population. The study population includes patients undergoing CABG without any additional concomitant procedures. Off-pump patients without planned proximal anastomosis to the aorta (ie, "no touch aorta") and patients scheduled for repeat CABG procedures were excluded. Therefore, the patients in this study represent the preoperatively intended "touched aorta" approach for whom a change in surgical strategy would be considered. In addition to the planned surgical strategy, the following risk factors for ascending aortic atherosclerosis were documented prospectively: sex, age, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and left main disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking habits, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and previous neurologic events.
The initial (preoperative) surgical plan was based on the surgeons clinical judgment and findings on medical history, coronary angiography, ventriculography, and chest radiograph examination. The second planning stage was conducted after manual palpation of the ascending aorta. The final decision of which surgical approach to be used was now made by the senior surgeon, after intraoperative EAUS, by weighing the combined findings of EAUS, manual palpation, and all the pertinent information gathered earlier. The decision was multifactorial, mainly based on the size of the atheroma, the degree of the intraluminal parts, the morphology of the atheroma, the location in the ascending aorta, and all other clinical variables of the patient. Significant atheroma in the mid portion of ascending aorta that was graded moderate or severe (intimal thickening > 3 mm) was required to consider surgical decision change.7
EAUS Methodology
EAUS was performed using an echo system (Hewlett Packard 5500; Hewlett Packard; Seattle, WA). An 8-MHz handheld transducer (Hewlett Packard) was placed inside a sterile glove filled with gel, and inserted through a sterile sheath. For the anterior aortic wall view, a spacer comprised of a second glove filled with saline solution was used. The interpretation of the EAUS findings was carried out during the operation by the surgeon. The surgical decision in the three stages was documented in real-time in the operating room by the echocardiography technician.
Follow-up
Patients were followed up during hospitalization and up to 1 year thereafter. The follow-up during the hospital stay included the following: duration of ventilation in the cardiac surgery ICU, length of stay in the cardiac surgery ICU, and the occurrence of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or any other neurologic event, arrhythmias, and any other postoperative complications. The second step took place after the patient had been discharged from hospital, and this follow-up was conducted up to 1 year postoperatively by means of a telephone questionnaire. The main focus of this follow-up was to evaluate the patients cognitive state, presence of confusion, memory deficits, language difficulties, and neurologic deficits.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the
2 test or Fisher exact test for small numbers in order to discover any relationship between categorical variables; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Limitations of Aortic Palpation and Transesophageal Echocardiography
Manual intraoperative palpation can detect approximately one half of the cases of atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta and may, therefore, lead to incorrect surgical decisions.89 Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was found by others1011 to be better than manual aortic palpation but less sensitive than EAUS, especially in the mid and distal ascending aorta. In our study, the sensitivity of manual palpation in comparison to the EAUS was found to be 55%. Intraoperative EAUS has been reported to be a rapid, reliable, and accurate method of detecting atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta.7 Royse et al12 used EAUS as a "gold standard" for comparing manual palpation with TEE, and found the positive predictive value of TEE to be 39%; Ozatik et al13 reported EAUS sensitivity to be 96.8%. In our current study, EAUS was found to be highly accurate: no case of pathologic ascending aorta detected by other methods (manual palpation or radiographs) failed detection by EAUS.
Prevalence of Atheromatous Disease in the Ascending Aorta and the Relation to Preoperative Risk Factors
The prevalence of atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta was 38% (n = 40) in the current study. This seemingly high percentage is generally comparable to the findings of other authors.2 Davila-Roman et al7 reported mild atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta in 33% of their patients, moderate in 19%, and severe in 10%. Our findings of atheroma are reflected by the changes in the patients surgical planning: 72% of atheromas led to changes in decision making and were usually larger and located in the areas intended for manipulation, while the remaining 27% of atheromas were small and remote and thus did not result in any revisions of surgical planning. Of the selected preoperative risk factors, PVD (p = 0.036) and age > 70 years (p = 0.021) were associated with a pathologic ascending aorta. Ozatik et al13 reported that age > 70 years, hypertension, and PVD were preoperative risk factors for ascending aortic disease, while other investigators7 reported that the parameters of age and diabetes correlated with ascending aortic pathologic findings. The relatively high prevalence of ascending aortic findings in our patients without those risk factors, however, leads us and other authors12 to recommend EAUS in every patient undergoing cardiac surgery.
Changes in Surgical Planning as a Result of Perioperative Findings
Of the 105 patients included in the study group, 29 changes (28%) were decided on in our study, with the majority of these patients (n = 25) being converted from on-pump CABG to OPCAB. Reports that emerged prior to the recent development of OPCAB surgery described comparable percentages but different types of surgical changes.14 Ozatik et al13 reported switching the operative strategy from on-pump CABG to OPCAB in 27% of the modifications. The higher conversion rate to OPCAB in our study is probably the result of the general improvement in OPCAB techniques and the fact that 50% of our CABG procedures are routinely performed without the use of the heart-lung machine. The OPCAB option makes EAUS an even more important tool in contemporary surgical decision making.
Reduction in the Number of Neurologic Complications
The current study was not designed to look for reduction of stroke rates with the use of EAUS. For that purpose, a much wider study is required. Several authors reported postoperative improvement as a result of surgical modifications based on EAUS findings. Ozatic et al13 reported a significant reduction in the incidence of stroke (from 2.8 to 0.9%). Other authors121415 reported improved neurologic outcomes in patients with ascending aortic disease that had been detected by EAUS leading to surgical modification. The latter studies did not include OPCAB as an optional surgical modification. The improvements in OPCAB techniques, together with careful screening of the ascending aorta, may lead to better surgical results
Study Limitations
This study focused on the intraoperative decision-making process as a result of the availability of supplemental evidence from intraoperative EAUS. The study was not designed to reduce neurologic complications. A larger randomized trial would be needed to address the possible reduction in postoperative stroke as a result of EAUS in the OPCAB era. We used an 8-MHz echocardiography transducer usually used for transthoracic echocardiography. This transducer was not designed for epiaortic imaging, and this led to a suboptimal image. Surgeons using an 8-MHz transducer need to gain experience in order to accurately visualize the ascending aorta. Using transducers that were designed for that purpose should speed up the test, improve the visualization of the ascending aorta, and may improve the overall surgical results.
In conclusion, our findings showed that EAUS is more sensitive for detecting atherosclerotic disease than manual intraoperative palpation of the ascending aorta. The recent developments in cardiac surgery heighten the importance of EAUS as a tool in intraoperative surgical decision making. We recommend the routine use of EAUS in every CABG procedure.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication February 20, 2004. Accepted for publication August 30, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Jegger, P.-G. Chassot, M.-A. Bernath, J. Horisberger, P. Gersbach, P. Tozzi, D. Delay, and L. K. von Segesser A novel technique using echocardiography to evaluate venous cannula performance perioperatively in CPB cardiac surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 525 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |