|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||

* From the Department of Medicine (Respirology) [Dr. Marras], University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Microbiology (Dr. Wallace), University of Texas Health Center at Tyler; Department of Medicine (Pulmonary and Critical Care) [Drs. Koth, Daley, and Stulbarg], University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Internal Medicine (Preventive and Occupational Medicine) [Dr. Cowl], Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Deceased.
Correspondence to: Theodore K. Marras, MD, Division of Respirology, Toronto Western Hospital, Edith Cavell 4-022, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; e-mail: ted.marras{at}utoronto.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives: To describe a case of MAC-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction possibly from showering and review previous hot tub lung reports.
Methods: For the case report, we investigated a patient with histologically diagnosed hypersensitivity pneumonitis and MAC-positive sputum culture findings. Mycobacterial cultures were obtained from his home and workplace. Isolates were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. For the review, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for hot tub lung reports, which were reviewed and summarized.
Results: A 50-year-old man had progressive dyspnea and episodic fever and myalgias. Pulmonary function testing results revealed obstruction and impaired diffusion; a chest CT scan found diffuse, centrilobular, ground-glass nodules, and air trapping, and a lymphocytic alveolitis with an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio. Transbronchial biopsy showed multiple well-formed nonnecrotizing granulomas. Multiple respiratory samples and shower and bathtub specimens grew MAC, with matching pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. The patient changed from showering to tub bathing. Prednisone and antimycobacterial drugs were administered for approximately 1 year. His symptoms, pulmonary function abnormalities, and CT scan findings resolved. The literature review yielded 36 cases of hot tub lung. Clinical features included dyspnea (97%), cough (78%), and fever (58%). Pulmonary function testing showed obstruction (67%), restriction (55%), and impaired diffusion (75%). A chest CT scan showed ground-glass opacification (95%) and nodules (67%). Granulomas were well-formed in 95%. Treatments included discontinuation of hot tub use and prednisone, antimycobacterial drugs, or both. Outcomes were favorable.
Conclusions: A hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction to mycobacteria can occur from exposures other than hot tubs. There are key differences between classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and MAC-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Antimycobacterial therapy may be required. The possibility of MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis from showering raises potential implications in the investigation of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
Key Words: alveolitis, extrinsic allergic Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection Mycobacterium infections, atypical water microbiology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We present the first reported case of MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with exposure to MAC in the routine use of household water. Water samples from the patients shower and bathtub faucets and his sputum all yielded the same strain of MAC, as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A review of the details of this case and other cases of MAC- and NTM-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis highlights the clinical differences between "classic" hypersensitivity pneumonitis and MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which we propose may have implications for classification and treatment. Further, our report stresses the clinical importance of alternative sources of aerosolized MAC that can lead to MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physical examination was unremarkable. The chest examination was normal. In addition, there were no obvious skin or ocular lesions, organomegaly, or other features suggestive of sarcoidosis. His pulmonary function testing showed mild obstruction (FEV1/FVC = 0.67, FEV1 = 80% of predicted) and impaired diffusing capacity (62% of predicted). High-resolution CT of the lungs showed small, bilateral, diffuse, centrilobular, ground-glass nodules (Fig 1 , top, A) and extensive mosaic attenuation consistent with air trapping on expiratory images, all thought to be most consistent with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Of note, there was no adenopathy, no large nodules or consolidation, and no peribronchovascular or pleural thickening or nodularity. A CBC count with differential leukocyte count, serum creatinine, and liver enzymes and ECG were normal. An HIV test was negative. A serologic hypersensitivity pneumonitis panel comprising A. fumigatus, Micropolyspora faeni, Thymus vulgaris, and pigeon breeders serology was negative. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed. Cellular analysis of the BAL revealed 53% lymphocytes, with an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio of 15. Transbronchial biopsies showed multiple well-formed nonnecrotizing granulomas (Fig 2 ). Special stains for acid-fast bacilli were negative. Cultures from the BAL and two induced-sputum specimens grew MAC.
|
|
|
| Literature Review |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The search strategy yielded 164 hits of published articles. Eight citations568910111314 were selected for retrieval and full review. Review of the reference lists identified two additional citations.712 A summary of the clinical presentation and investigations reported in the identified studies is presented in Table 1 . All cases involved exposures from indoor hot tubs and the majority of patients had dyspnea, cough, and fever. CT scanning was performed in 23 patients, while high-resolution CT was performed in at least 16 patients. In addition to the common findings of ground-glass opacities and nodules, "nonspecific alveolitis" and findings "compatible with hypersensitivity pneumonitis" were also described.9 Pulmonary function was discussed in only 12 cases, and there was no predominant abnormality, with obstruction, restriction, and impaired diffusion all present in the majority of patients. Cytologic BAL data were reviewed in only three cases614; there was a lymphocytic alveolitis (mean, 67% lymphocytes) with elevated CD4/CD8 ratios of 12,6 49, and 6.14 Tissue biopsies were reported in 26 cases, from at least one patient in all of the reviewed articles. Surgical lung biopsies were performed in 23 cases, and transbronchial biopsies were the only source of tissue in 3 cases. In addition to the characteristically described well-formed granulomas, a peribronchial distribution of the granulomas was present in four studies (14 patients),691012 absent in two studies (2 patients),513 and not commented on in the remaining four reports (11 patients).781114
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We think that the possibility that this case was secondary to hot tub MAC exposure is low for two reasons. First, we were able to isolate the organism from the bathroom but not the hot tub, providing clear evidence for at least exposure in the shower. Second, even if there were significant quantities of undetected MAC antigen present in the hot tub, the magnitude of exposure would likely be higher in the in the patients enclosed shower booth, used daily, than in his outdoor hot tub, which he used sparingly. Furthermore, hot tub lung has never been described in the setting of an outdoor hot tub. We think it is unlikely that the workplace isolate was valid and that there are multiple possible sources of the patients MAC. This is supported by the scarcity of recoverable MAC in potable water in the patients area,17 the multiple positive home specimens, and the clonality of the isolates as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
A controversial issue in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reactions to inhaled MAC is whether the syndrome represents classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, infection, or both. Support for the hypothesis that antigens from MAC organisms can cause pulmonary hypersensitivity reactions comes from case series of intravesical instillation of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for carcinoma of the bladder,1819 and exposure to metal working fluids in machinists.202122 Israel-Biet et al18 reported a series of three patients who acquired systemic illness after intravesical BCG instillations, two of whom had diffuse interstitial changes on chest radiography. Respiratory culture and biopsy results were negative for mycobacteria, but BAL revealed a lymphocytic alveolitis with CD4/CD8 ratios ranging from 3 to 7.5. Two patients were treated with corticosteroids, the third patient was treated simply with discontinuation of BCG instillations, and all recovered. The authors concluded that interstitial pneumonitis during BCG therapy was explained by a hypersensitivity phenomenon in response to mycobacterial antigens. Exposure to Mycobacterium immunogenum in metal-working fluids has also been proposed as a cause of an hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction in machinists.202122 The recently proposed species was recovered from metal-working fluids in all cases, and serum precipitins to the organism were sought and identified in two reports.2022 Affected patients have been treated with corticosteroids and removal from the work environment.22
Although we did not observe acid-fast bacilli in our patients transbronchial lung biopsy, or process the biopsy for mycobacterial culture, we are confident that MAC was the cause for his pulmonary syndrome. Acid-fast stains of granulomas from patients with hot tub lung in previous reports910111314 were negative in 19 of 26 cases (73%). In addition, in miliary tuberculosis, a mycobacterial infection with a diffuse pulmonary granulomatous reaction, acid-fast stains are generally negative.2324 Data in pulmonary NTM are less readily available, but the lack of acid-fast organisms in granulomas is well recognized.25 In fact, finding granulomas in a lung biopsy, without coexisting acid-fast bacilli, fulfils a component of the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary NTM disease.2
Despite the radiographic and clinical evidence suggesting that MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis may be a form of classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, data from our case and previous reports (Tables 1 , 2) highlight some key differences between classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction to MAC and other NTM infections. Although all 17 reported patients with MAC-associated hot tub lung who underwent biopsies had granulomas identified, in all 15 reports containing detailed descriptions, granulomas were described as "well-formed," and in 3 of 17 cases (19%) some were necrotic, findings not typical for classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In the three previous cases reported with BAL data, and our patient, the CD4/CD8 ratios were elevated at 12,6 49 and 6,14 and 15, respectively. These findings are consistent with BAL reports in patients with hypersensitivity to intravesical BCG1819 and sarcoidosis,26 rather than classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, where the CD4/CD8 ratio is expected to be < 1.27 In addition, BAL CD4/CD8 ratios are increased in patients with classic pulmonary MAC infection, with a mean ratio of 6 reported in one study.28 The elevated CD4/CD8 ratio reported in our patient and previous patients with MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis suggests that the pulmonary response to MAC may be immunologically different than in patients with classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in response to other antigens. However, whether this immune response reflects an infectious reaction is not clear, as some patients with hot tub lung have been reported to improve with simple avoidance of the hot tub. However, the elevated CD4/CD8 ratio is consistent with reports of variable29 or increased30 ratios in patients with farmers lung and CD4/CD8 ratios that increased over time in a group of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis of mixed etiology.31 Finally, the finding of airflow limitation in our case and in those previously reported differs from classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, where restriction is the dominant spirometric abnormality. The finding of airflow limitation is likely secondary to a bronchiolitis, which has been shown to correlate with obstruction in hypersensitivity pneumonitis,32 and likely dominates the determinants of physiologic manifestations of MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
Support for the hypothesis that MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a form of infection is found in two previous reports. Kahana et al5 described a patient with hot tub lung who progressed despite discontinuing exposure, and improved only after the institution of antimycobacterial therapy. Khoor et al9 described a patient with an indoor hot tub who acquired MAC bacteremia after an initial diagnosis of sarcoidosis and initiation of corticosteroid therapy. The patient improved after discontinuation of corticosteroids and treatment with antimycobacterial drugs. It was only later that the patient was thought to have hot tub lung. Details regarding timing of discontinuation of hot tub use were unclear in the latter case. Although discontinuation of exposure is probably the most important treatment measure, the data summarized in Table 2 suggest that antimycobacterial therapy may be more important than systemic corticosteroids. This notion rests on the assumptions that the cases represent a homogeneous group and that outcomes were defined similarly in all studies, which may be incorrect. Data regarding BAL CD4/CD8 ratios are inadequate to aid the decision regarding specific therapy. The presence of necrotic granulomas may intuitively support the use of antimycobacterial drugs, but the available data are inadequate to support this hypothesis. Based on the limited available data, we recommend the combination of antimycobacterial drugs and systemic corticosteroids in moderate to severe cases of MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
Another potentially difficult distinction in our patients case is between sarcoidosis and a hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like pattern. The histologic distinction between MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis and sarcoidosis in ours, and previously reported cases, is difficult. The granulomas in MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis have been described as well formed, possibly consistent with sarcoidosis. However, granulomas in MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis tend to be centrilobular in distribution, without pleural or septal involvement, and occasionally necrotic, both of which are unusual for sarcoidosis. The high-resolution CT findings in our case would be very unusual in sarcoidosis. None of the usual high-resolution CT findings were present in our patient, who had neither lymph node enlargement nor peribronchovascular or pleural thickening or nodularity. In addition, we are unaware of a convincing reported case of clinical pulmonary MAC infection with coexisting sarcoidosis. Also, the two cases outlined above, where antimycobacterial therapy was clearly required,59 argue against sarcoidosis as the cause of this syndrome. Finally, the development of pulmonary hypersensitivity syndromes in response to other mycobacterial species, including BCG in intravesical therapy for bladder carcinoma and M immunogenum in metal-working fluids argues further against sarcoidosis. The isolation of mycobacterial nucleic acid from lesions in some patients with sarcoidosis333435 is also an interesting consideration in this context. However, we argue that the case we describe is a hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction, rather than a mycobacterial reaction that is indistinguishable from sarcoidosis.
Our findings may have important clinical implications regarding the investigation of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. MAC and other NTM may cause an hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction, and these organisms may be isolated from household water supplies. Showering, which has become the dominant method of bathing in recent decades, has been proposed as an ideal mode of entry of NTM into the lungs,36 and is strongly supported by our findings. In this context, the routine collection of sputum (and when available bronchoscopic and surgical specimens) and environmental samples for mycobacterial studies may be an important component of patient evaluation in hypersensitivity pneumonitis of unknown etiology. BAL CD4/CD8 ratios may also be helpful in supporting the diagnosis, but these data are limited.
In summary, we present a case of hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction secondary to exposure to MAC, possibly from showering, a previously unreported source of antigen in this syndrome. Findings suggest that the reaction differs from classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis but remains poorly defined. The potential implications for the clinical assessment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in general are significant and deserve further investigation.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Dr. Marras was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Canadian Thoracic Society.
Abbreviations: BCG = bacille Calmette-Guérin; MAC = Mycobacterium avium complex; NTM = nontuberculous mycobacteria
Received for publication March 8, 2004. Accepted for publication August 10, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Glassroth Pulmonary Disease Due to Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 243 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Waller, A. Roy, L. Brumble, A. Khoor, M. M. Johnson, and J. L. Garland The Expanding Spectrum of Mycobacterium avium Complex-Associated Pulmonary Disease. Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1234 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Pietila, P. K. Vohra, B. Sanyal, N. L. Wengenack, S. Raghavakaimal, and C. F. Thomas Jr. Cloning and Characterization of CYP51 from Mycobacterium avium Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2006; 35(2): 236 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |