|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Jankelowitz, Wolfe, Cullina, and Jain) and Neurology (Drs. Reid and Zee), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL.
Correspondence to: Manu Jain, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University, 240 East Huron St, McGaw Pavilion second floor, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: m-jain{at}northwestern.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Using wrist actigraphy, we measured sleep quality in clinically stable CF patients and age-matched control subjects. In addition, each CF patient and control subject completed the following three questionnaires: the Epworth sleepiness scale; the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI); and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form.
Results: Twenty CF patients and control subjects were enrolled in the study, and were well-matched for age, sex, and body mass index. The mean (± SD) FEV1 for CF patients was 61.0 ± 20.1% predicted. CF patients and control subjects had similar sleep duration, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. However, CF patients had higher PSQI scores (6.45 vs 4.55, respectively; p = .04), a higher fragmentation index (FI) [31.72 vs 18.02, respectively; p < 0.001], and less immobile time (88.87 vs 91.89, respectively; p = 0.02). There was a significant correlation of FI with FEV1 and PSQI scores.
Conclusions: Stable CF patients have disrupted sleep, and sleep disruption may in part be related to the severity of pulmonary disease. In addition, the PSQI may be useful in detecting CF patients with poor sleep quality.
Key Words: actigraphy cystic fibrosis fragmentation Pittsburgh sleep quality index sleep
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sleep disruption may significantly impair daytime functioning and health-related quality of life.14 Health consequences may include impaired immune responses and metabolic abnormalities, as well as endocrine and cardiovascular dysfunction1516171819. Thus, sleep disruption could potentially exacerbate symptoms and worsen prognosis in an already compromised population such as CF patients. In order to optimize the complex medical management of CF patients, it is important to understand the magnitude of sleep disruption in this population and to identify the predictors of at-risk patients in whom further evaluation may be indicated.
Previous reports on sleep disturbances in CF patients have been conflicting. Some studies202122 have found CF patients to have reduced total sleep time, whereas others23 found no differences in sleep time when compared with healthy control subjects. Moreover, some reports found CF patients to have poor sleep efficiency2223 and increased sleep latency,22 while others found no differences2021 compared to control subjects. Thus, the presence and/or extent of sleep disruption in CF patients seems unclear.
Conflicting results in the past could be in part due to the use of a single overnight polysomnogram, which is considered to be the "gold standard" for assessing sleep quality. Pulmonary symptoms and exacerbations are episodic in the CF population. Polysomnography may thus be limited in its usefulness because a single-night study in a laboratory may not accurately reflect sleep quality in a home environment over a period of time. A commonly used alternative to polysomnography for recording sleep and wakefulness is activity monitoring. Sleep-wake activity determined by activity monitoring correlates relatively highly with polysomnography in many healthy and patient populations.242526 An advantage of activity monitoring is that it allows the continuous assessment of both wake and sleep behavior in the patients own environment over extended periods of time.
Using an activity monitor, we sought to determine whether sleep quality (eg, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and fragmentation index [FI]) in CF patients with varying severities of lung disease is diminished compared to age-matched control subjects. We also wished to ascertain whether sleep parameters correlated with pulmonary disease severity, and validated questionnaires assessing quality of life and sleep.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years of age were recruited from the adult CF clinic at Northwestern University from January 2002 to April 2003. CF diagnoses had been confirmed by an abnormal sweat chloride test result and/or the presence of two disease-causing mutations. Patients were ineligible if they had received oral or IV antibiotics for a pulmonary exacerbation in the 8 weeks prior to enrollment or had primary cardiac disease, psychiatric disorders, or a known sleep disorder. If a patient experienced a pulmonary exacerbation during the study, that patient was excluded from the study. Healthy, age-matched control subjects were enrolled in the same study protocol. Control subjects were excluded if they had any history of medical or sleep disorders, or consumed excessive quantities of alcohol or caffeine. The study was approved by Northwestern University Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained for all participants.
Study Design
Age, sex, height, and weight were obtained on the day of study enrollment. Each CF patient and control subject completed spirometry (
max 20 C-series; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA; and Morris-Polgar prediction equations) and three questionnaires, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (SF-36), on the day of study enrollment. Patients and subjects were given a form for keeping a sleep log for 14 days.
The PSQI is a self-administered questionnaire that measures sleep quality during the previous month, and contains 19 self-rated questions yielding both a global score and seven "component" subscores. A global PSQI score of > 5 indicates that a person is a "poor sleeper."27
A subjective assessment of sleepiness was performed using the ESS questionnaire, which is a reliable and validated, self-administered questionnaire for measuring daytime sleepiness in adults. ESS scores significantly correlate with sleep latency (an indication of sleepiness) measured during multiple sleep latency testing and overnight polysomnography.2829 Patients are considered to be sleepy if they have an ESS score of > 10.
The SF-36 is a quality-of-life questionnaire, yielding scores for eight domains, as well as two summary scores, a mental component summary score and a physical component summary score.30 This measure is constructed to satisfy the minimum psychometric standards that are necessary for group comparisons involving generic health concepts that are not specific to any age, disease, or treatment group. The eight domains consist of physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Each of the eight domains is scored on a scale of 100 points, with higher scores indicating better functioning. The scores are standardized to a mean (SD) of 50 in the general US adult population and can therefore be used to determine whether a group or individual in question scores above or below the US average. Scores above and below 50 indicate above and below average functioning, respectively.30
Wrist Actigraphy
Wrist actigraphy (WA) detects physical motion, is a validated measure of sleep, and compares favorably to polysomnography.242526 CF patients and control subjects wore a wrist actigraph (Mini Motionloggers or Actillume; Ambulatory Monitoring Co; Ardsley, NY) for 14 days. Data stored in memory was downloaded and analyzed using a commercially available program (Action 3; Ambulatory Monitoring Co) with the actigraph worn on the nondominant arm. A sample actogram is shown in Figure 1
. The program can score activity/inactivity and derive from it periods of sleep or wakefulness using a computer-generated algorithm. Sleep log data are used in the computer algorithm to calculate sleep latency. It is also used in conjunction with activity monitoring to confirm bedtimes.25 WA data were analyzed cumulatively for the 2-week period during which subjects wore the actigraph and then separately for weekdays (ie, Sunday to Thursday) and weekends (ie, Friday and Saturday). There are several measures that can be derived from these algorithms, such as the FI, mean activity score (MAS), and immobile time (IT). The FI measures restlessness and is calculated by summing the percentage of minutes spent moving with the percentage time spent in the immobility phase per minute. MAS is the magnitude of activity on a per-epoch basis during sleep, and it is calculated by dividing the total activity score by the number of epochs during the assumed sleep period. IT is derived by dividing the number of minutes spent immobile by the assumed sleep time and multiplying by 100 (Action 3; Ambulatory Monitoring Co).
|
2 analysis to compare groups for ESS and PSQI. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. A Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship of continuous variables. We performed jackknife estimates of correlation coefficients (obtained by eliminating one x-y pair at a time), which provide a robust estimate of the underlying linear relationship (correlation) between variables of interest.31 A 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, which provides the most plausible range for jackknife correlation coefficient under assumption of repeated sampling. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
WA Data
Control and CF patients had similar total sleep time, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. Sleep onset and offset times were also comparable, meaning that CF patients and control subjects were going to bed and waking up at approximately the same times. Both CF patients and control subjects went to sleep an average of 1 h later on the weekends than during the week. The total activity score and MASs were also similar. In contrast, CF patients had a higher FI and less IT than control subjects (Table 2
). There were no differences between weekdays and weekends for these parameters in either group (data not shown). Compared to control subjects, CF patients also displayed greater night-to-night variability in FI (p < 0.003) and IT (p < 0.02), as evidenced by greater SDs when each night was assessed separately (Table 2). These findings are consistent with the overall more disrupted sleep for CF patients.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous investigations20212223 in CF patients using polysomnography have reported conflicting results in sleep parameters including, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and arousal index (AI). In the current study, using wrist activity monitoring, we found no differences in sleep efficiency and latency between control subjects and CF patients. In addition, sleep duration was 2 h longer in our CF patients than previously reported.2022 In contrast to control subjects, CF patients had a higher FI and a lower IT (ie, they spent less time lying still), which is consistent with more disrupted sleep. The FI, unlike sleep efficiency, measures the number of times an individual moves rather than the percentage of time that they spend awake during the sleep period. The FI may be a more useful measure to examine sleep disturbance because it may better detect repetitive short events that disrupt sleep.
The discrepancies between our results and previous findings may be due at least in part to methodological differences. WA is less cumbersome and can be performed in a subjects natural sleep environment, as opposed to polysomnography, which is usually performed in a sleep laboratory. In addition, we sampled sleep for a 2-week period compared to a single night, which is typical for studies using polysomnography. By measuring sleep for 2 weeks in the home environment, we think that our study offers a more representative assessment of sleep-wake habits of CF patients and age-matched control subjects, especially in light of the greater night-to-night variability displayed by our CF subjects.
While CF patients have more disrupted sleep and rate their sleep as being worse than control subjects on the PSQI, they do not report greater sleepiness on the ESS. Self-assessed ratings such as the ESS, however, can have limited correlation to objective measures of daytime sleepiness.3334 Therefore, the increased sleep fragmentation observed in the CF patients may still have consequences for daytime function. Future studies of CF patients should evaluate the relationship between sleep fragmentation and objective measures of daytime sleepiness such as the multiple sleep latency test and/or neurocognitive performance.
Compared to previous studies of sleep in CF patients, our study included patients with milder disease. Our patients had an average FEV1 of 61% predicted and a BMI of 23, both of which are higher than those values in CF patients, in whom sleep data has been previously reported.20212223 Nearly two thirds of CF patients who are
18 years of age have an FEV1 of < 70% predicted.2 Our results need to be validated in a larger study but suggest that a significant proportion of CF patients may experience sleep disruption, which would put them at risk for reduced neurocognitive function, and potentially poorer health and sense of well being.22
There is limited information about sleep fragmentation in CF patients and how this relates to measures of pulmonary disease severity.2122 While daytime hypoxemia predicts nocturnal oxyhemoglobin desaturation in CF patients,2135 and nocturnal hypoxemia correlated with sleep efficiency in one study,22 oxygen supplementation has not resulted in improved sleep quality.203637 In another study, maximum expiratory strength correlated with rapid eye movement respiratory disturbance index scores, but spirometric function and arterial blood gas levels did not correlate with the respiratory disturbance index scores.21 This suggests that lung function and gas exchange are not good predictors of sleep fragmentation but respiratory muscle strength may be. However, in our study the FEV1 correlated with actigraphically recorded FI, a measure of disrupted sleep. One reason for this apparent discrepancy may be that prior studies did not assess the relationship between pulmonary function and the AI. The AI is the one polysomnography parameter that is most closely analogous to the FI in our study.
Previous studies3839 have shown inverse correlations between PSQI scores and polysomnography-measured sleep efficiency. When combined with our results, the PSQI appears to be a useful screening tool to identify CF patients who are at risk for sleep disturbance, especially if they have a decreased FEV1. Compared to polysomnography, the PSQI is simple to perform, inexpensive, could be followed over time, and does not involve a hospital stay. If the PSQI suggests poor sleep quality, then WA and/or polysomnography studies may be obtained for further evaluation of the underlying sleep disorders. Given the night-to-night variability observed in CF patients and the relative cost of polysomnography, it may be more accurate and cost-effective to obtain wrist activity monitoring.
That many CF patients experience poor sleep is clear from the present study, but the underlying etiology of the sleep disturbance is not. Possibilities include nocturnal coughing,4041 the use of ß2-agonists before sleep, increased work of breathing,4243 psychiatric disorders, and/or periodic leg movements. While our data do not allow us to distinguish between these possibilities, they do suggest avenues for future investigation. Future studies evaluating these potential mechanisms may suggest therapeutic interventions (eg, cough suppression, anxiolytics, bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation), which could be tested in clinical trials.
There are potential limitations of this study. The sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of these findings and should be confirmed in a larger study. A limitation of WA is the inability to detect differences between quiet wakefulness and sleep, resulting in an underestimation of sleep disruption or duration. However, in the current study CF patients had greater sleep disruption than control subjects. There is also the potential to overestimate total sleep time if subjects are lying quietly awake, which would lead to an overestimation of sleep efficiency. Based on these considerations, CF patients may actually have a greater number of sleep abnormalities than those measured in our study. While we do not have concomitant polysomnography data to confirm the WA data, several previous studies25 in other patient populations have successfully used activity monitoring to characterize sleep-wake characteristics.
Sleep fragmentation and decreased sleep quality are common in CF patients and likely to contribute to decreased daytime function and quality of life. It is not known whether improving sleep quality can reduce disease severity or associated health problems in this population. In light of the consequences of prolonged sleep loss/sleep disruption on health and well-being, the identification and treatment of sleep disorders in CF patients should be an integral part of disease management.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Grant Support: Pulmonary Critical Care Divisional Funds.
Received for publication June 22, 2004. Accepted for publication November 22, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |