|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Medicine, Respiratory Division, University of British Columbia, and The James Hogg iCAPTURE Center for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St Pauls Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Correspondence to: Don D. Sin, MD, MPH, FCCP, James Hogg iCAPTURE Center for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St. Pauls Hospital, Room 368A, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; e-mail: dsin{at}mrl.ubc.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Longitudinal population-based study and a metaanalysis of literature.
Setting: Representative sample of the general population.
Participants: Participants of the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study who were 40 to 60 years of age at baseline assessment (n = 1,861).
Measurements and results: We compared the risk of cardiovascular mortality across quintiles of FEV1. Individuals in the lowest FEV1 quintile had the highest risk of cardiovascular mortality (relative risk [RR], 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 7.34). Compared to FEV1 quintile 1, individuals in quintile 5 had a fivefold increase in the risk of death from ischemic heart disease (RR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.26 to 14.13). We also performed a systematic review of large cohort studies (> 500 participants) that reported on the relationship between FEV1 and cardiovascular mortality (12 studies; n = 83,880 participants). Compared to participants in the highest FEV1 category, those with reduced FEV1 had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (pooled RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.56 to 1.97).
Conclusions: There is strong epidemiologic evidence to indicate that reduced FEV1 is a marker for cardiovascular mortality independent of age, gender, and smoking history.
Key Words: cardiovascular mortality FEV1 lung function metaanalysis National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements
Spirometry was conducted in a subset of NHANES 1 participants (n = 6,913). Using a spirometer (Model 800; Ohio Medical Instruments; Cincinnati, OH), participants performed five FVC maneuvers from which two reproducible and error-free FEV1 and FVC values were recorded.11 We used published prediction equations to calculate predicted FEV1 and FVC values for each participant.12 For analytic purposes, the study cohort was divided into quintiles based on the predicted FEV1. Other measurements were used as covariates, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic BP, total cholesterol, and current smoking status. We also calculated a Framingham risk score13 and included this as a covariate in the model.
Vital status information was obtained by tracing each participant through telephone contacts, direct mail, in-proxy interviews, and searches of the National Death Index database and state department vital statistics records.10 Death certificates were available for 96.6% of the decedents and were used to ascertain the principal cause of the mortality, which were codified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Cardiovascular mortality was defined as deaths in which the principal cause of mortality was cardiovascular in nature, using ICD-9 codes 410429. Deaths from ischemic heart disease were defined similarly, except we used ICD-9 code 410.
Hospitalization information was initially obtained during the follow-up interviews as part of the NHEFS. The data obtained during the interview were verified by examining inpatient records, discharge summaries, and pathology reports (if any) of the participants. For analytic purposes, we considered only the principal diagnosis of the hospitalization, using codes 410429 for cardiovascular and code 410 for ischemic heart disease hospitalizations.
Statistical Analysis
To make our cohort as homogenous as possible and to exclude participants who had known or unknown (severe) cardiovascular diseases and other conditions, we excluded all participants who died or were unavailable for follow-up within the first 3 years of the follow-up period. Moreover, we restricted our study sample to those from 40 to 60 years of age, leaving data from 1,861 participants eligible for this study. This cohort was divided into FEV1 quintiles. Using the highest quintile as the referent group in a Cox proportional hazards model, we compared the cardiovascular and ischemic heart disease mortality rates across the quintiles for the mortality analysis. We performed a similar analysis using cardiovascular and ischemic heart disease hospitalization as the outcome variables. For this analysis, if a sampled person had multiple hospitalization records, only the first hospitalization record was used. Finally, to determine cardiovascular hospitalization-free survival, we calculated the time to the first cardiovascular event (either cardiovascular hospitalization or death) using the Cox proportional hazards model. The covariates considered were age, BMI, gender, race, systolic and diastolic BP, total serum cholesterol level, use of antihypertensive medications, Framingham risk score, and current smoking status. Age was included as both a continuous and categorical variable (in quartiles). As there was little difference in the overall findings, we inserted age as a categorical variable for parsimony. BMI was divided into quintiles (quintile 1, < 21.9 kg/m2; quintile 2, 21.9 to 24.1 kg/m2; quintile 3, 24.2 to 26.4 kg/m2; quintile 4, 26.5 to 29.1 kg/m2; and quintile 5,
29.2 kg/m2). Systolic and diastolic BP values were inserted as continuous variables. Because all of these variables have important effects on cardiovascular outcomes, we forced them into our final model. All analyses were conducted using software (Version 8.02; SAS Institute; Cary, NC; and SAS-callable SUDAAN, Version 8.0; Research Triangle Institute; Research Triangle Park, NC). All tests were two tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Both weighted and unweighted analyses were performed to check the sufficiency of the multivariate model used. The results of the unweighted analyses were very similar to the ones of the weighted analyses, so they are not discussed any further. Plots of estimated survival rates over time were examined to verify that the proportional hazard model assumptions were met.
Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
We conducted a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. We limited our search to long-term, population-based, prospective studies published before 2004 that reported on the relationship between cardiovascular mortality and FEV1 values. To identify potentially relevant articles, we combined disease-specific search terms ("forced expiratory volume" or "respiratory function" or "vital capacity"), with outcome-specific terms ("cardiovascular diseases" or "myocardial" or "arrhythmia" or "heart diseases" or "coronary disease" or "sudden death") and design-specific terms (prospective" or "follow-up studies" or "prognosis"). We also scanned the bibliographies and reference lists of the searched articles to identify additional studies that may have been missed by the initial computerized search. We included only those studies that were large (> 500 participants), community based (and not hospital or outpatient clinic based), employed a prospective method of data collection, and reported on cardiovascular mortality according to FEV1. We excluded studies in which the study populations were chosen based on disease. From each relevant article, two authors independently reviewed the results and abstracted the following information: year of publication, nature of the study sample, age of the cohort, duration of follow-up, and whether or not adjustments for smoking status were made. Any discrepancies were resolved through iteration and consensus. From the included studies, we compared the risk of cardiovascular mortality among participants in the lowest FEV1 category (however that was defined in the study) to those in highest FEV1 category, adjusted for potential confounders including age, gender, and smoking status. In a secondary analysis, we meta-analyzed data from those studies that reported on the relationship between cardiovascular mortality and FEV1 among lifetime nonsmokers and among men and women, separately. Heterogeneity of results across individual studies was checked for using the Cochran Q test. If significant heterogeneity was observed (p < 0.10), we employed the Dersimonian and Laird random effects model to combine the results; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. We also constructed a funnel plot to assess publication bias. We rated the quality of the study using criteria from the US Preventive Services Task Force and the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.1415 A rating of "good" was assigned to studies in which eight or more responses were positive, a rating of "fair" was assigned to studies in which five to seven responses were positive, and a rating of "poor" was assigned to studies in which fewer than five responses were positive. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager version 4.1 (Revman; The Cochrane Collaboration; Oxford, England).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In all cases, the risk of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization increased with decreasing FEV1. In the weighted analysis, individuals in the lowest FEV1 quintile (quintile 1) had the highest risk of cardiovascular mortality (relative risk [RR], 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 7.34) compared with those in the highest FEV1 quintile (quintile 5) [Table 1]. The risk was slightly lower in FEV1 quintiles 2 and 3 (RR, 2.00, 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.89 for quintile 2; RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.01 for quintile 3). The relationship between reduced FEV1 and mortality from ischemic heart disease was even more striking. Compared with FEV1 quintile 1, individuals in quintile 5 had a greater than fivefold increase in the risk of death from ischemic heart disease (RR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.26 to 14.13) [Table 1]. Similar findings were observed when we restricted the analysis to nonsmokers (Table 2 ).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These data are consistent with other published population-based studies, in which investigators systematically examined the relationship between FEV1 and cardiovascular mortality.161718192021222324252627 Our pooled analysis of the studies that categorized FEV1 in quintiles demonstrated that individuals in the lowest FEV1 quintile (approximately < 75 to 80% of predicted) have a 75% increase in the risk for cardiovascular mortality compared with those in the highest FEV1 quintile. Even among lifetime nonsmokers, this relationship held, indicating that reduced lung function independent of smoking is a significant marker for cardiovascular mortality.
There are three potential explanations for the relationship between various lung conditions that give rise to reduced FEV1 and cardiovascular disease. The first possibility is that there is a common offending agent (associated with reduced FEV1) that affects both pulmonary and cardiovascular systems such that reduced FEV1 serves as an epiphenomenon of this "third" factor. A second possibility is that the relationship is confounded by various measured and unmeasured variables. The third possibility is that the lung processes may be causally linked to cardiovascular disease. There are several lines of evidence that suggest a causal association is possible. Although fibrotic lung and obstructive airway diseases are disparate conditions, both can give rise to systemic inflammation and increased systemic levels of CRP and fibrinogen.3282930 In these conditions, CRP and other acute-phase proteins may increase in response to certain cytokines and growth factors that may be overexpressed in the lung tissue.731 Although the precise mechanism by which this occurs is unknown, in rabbit models, Suwa and colleagues32 have shown that induction of airway inflammation can incite and propagate systemic inflammation, which in turn may contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis. This observation is consistent with the notion that low-grade systemic inflammation is a major risk factor for plaque genesis, progression, and rupture.33
There are limitations to the current study. Because the present review relied on published reports of data, residual confounding by other risk factors is a concern. Moreover, for the metaanalysis, we did not have access to individualized data; thus, we could not determine the appropriateness of FEV1 cut-off values used across the studies and we could not determine the exact shape of the relationship between FEV1 and cardiovascular mortality. A pooled analysis of individualized data from these studies may be of value in addressing the shortcomings of the present study. Furthermore, future large prospective studies are needed to determine whether differential changes in FEV1 over time can modify the risk of cardiovascular events. Second, for the NHEFS analysis, we relied on ICD-9 coding on hospital records and death certificates to ascertain cardiovascular event rates in the cohort. Previous studies3435 suggest that this approach may overestimate the burden of cardiovascular events in the community. Random misclassification of cardiovascular event data across FEV1 quintiles would have biased the findings toward the null value. Therefore, the results from the current analysis may be a conservative estimate of the impact of FEV1 on cardiovascular outcomes. Third, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility of publication bias in the systematic review.36 Therefore, the findings of the metaanalysis should be interpreted cautiously.36
In summary, the NHEFS as well other published population-based data suggest that reduced FEV1 is a marker for cardiovascular mortality, independent of smoking history. FEV1, which is easily measurable in ambulatory clinic settings, provides additional prognostic information, which may help to better risk-stratify patients and populations for future cardiovascular events. Future work is needed to determine whether lung conditions giving rise to reduced FEV1 can contribute to atherosclerosis and whether treatment of these conditions can improve cardiovascular outcomes in such patients.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Dr. Sin is supported by a Canada Research Chair (Respiration) and a Michael Smith/St. Pauls Hospital Foundation Professorship in COPD.
Received for publication June 1, 2004. Accepted for publication November 1, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
system in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161,1179-1184This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Han, V. V. McLaughlin, G. J. Criner, and F. J. Martinez Pulmonary Diseases and the Heart Circulation, December 18, 2007; 116(25): 2992 - 3005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Downs, C. Schindler, L.-J. S. Liu, D. Keidel, L. Bayer-Oglesby, M. H. Brutsche, M. W. Gerbase, R. Keller, N. Kunzli, P. Leuenberger, et al. Reduced Exposure to PM10 and Attenuated Age-Related Decline in Lung Function N. Engl. J. Med., December 6, 2007; 357(23): 2338 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Alexeeff, A. A. Litonjua, H. Suh, D. Sparrow, P. S. Vokonas, and J. Schwartz Ozone Exposure and Lung Function: Effect Modified by Obesity and Airways Hyperresponsiveness in the VA Normative Aging Study Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 1890 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tomoda, M. Yoshikawa, T. Itoh, S. Tamaki, A. Fukuoka, K. Komeda, and H. Kimura Elevated Circulating Plasma Adiponectin in Underweight Patients With COPD Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Fuhrman, E Jougla, J Nicolau, D Eilstein, and M-C Delmas Deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France, 1979-2002: a multiple cause analysis Thorax, November 1, 2006; 61(11): 930 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Aronson, I. Roterman, M. Yigla, A. Kerner, O. Avizohar, R. Sella, P. Bartha, Y. Levy, and W. Markiewicz Inverse Association between Pulmonary Function and C-Reactive Protein in Apparently Healthy Subjects Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2006; 174(6): 626 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Hayden, P. Cote, and C. Bombardier Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med, March 21, 2006; 144(6): 427 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D D Sin and S F P Man Skeletal muscle weakness, reduced exercise tolerance, and COPD: is systemic inflammation the missing link? Thorax, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |