| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
|
|
|
|||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1b Therapy in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis*
* From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Bajwa and Malhotra), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA; the Department of Medicine (Drs. Ayas and Schulzer) and the Pacific Parkinson’s Research Centre (Mr. Mak), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Ryu), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Correspondence to: Atul Malhotra, MD, FCCP, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: amalhotra1{at}partners.org
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 TOP Abstract IntroductionMethods and MaterialsResultsReferences |
|---|
1b therapy, but the efficacy of this treatment has not been proven. Objective: To determine whether IFN treatment reduces mortality in patients with IPF.
Design: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of IFN-1b as treatment for IPF.
Main outcome measure: Mortality in patients treated with IFN-1b was compared to mortality in patients treated with control therapies.
Results: A total of three studies involving 390 patients was included in the analysis. IFN-1b therapy was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.418; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.253 to 0.690; p = 0.0003). A comparison of mortality at different time points revealed that IFN-1b therapy was associated with significantly reduced mortality at 1 year (0.0861; 95% CI, 0.0244 to 0.1478; p = 0.0063), 18 months (0.1682; 95% CI, 0.1065 to 0.2299; p < 0.0001), 650 days (0.1939; 95% CI, 0.1386 to 0.2492; p < 0.0001), and 2 years (0.2652; 95% CI, 0.1652 to 0.3652; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: When the results of multiple studies are combined in a metaanalysis, IFN-1b therapy is associated with reduced mortality.
Key Words: interferon • lung • pulmonary fibrosis • restriction • survival • treatment
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionMethods and MaterialsResultsReferences |
|---|
Recently, much attention has focused on the utility of the T-helper type 1 cytokine interferon (IFN)- as a treatment for IPF. The rationale for its use has been based on observations of its properties as an inhibitor of fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis and deposition, and expression of profibrotic cytokines.6789 In addition, IFN- appears to modulate immunity by enhancing host defenses against infection in specific populations and by altering the nature of the inflammatory response.101112
Previously, a small randomized controlled trial13 involving 18 patients showed a significant improvement in physiologic parameters resulting from treatment with IFN-1b and prednisolone compared with treatment with prednisolone and placebo. However, a more recent randomized controlled trial14 involving 330 patients failed to show a benefit from IFN-1b therapy compared with placebo. Additionally, reports314 have surfaced that suggest there is harm potentially associated with IFN therapy. Thus, there exists substantial controversy regarding the potential role of IFN-1b in the treatment of IPF.15 To update the state of knowledge in this area, we conducted a metaanalysis of data from randomized controlled trials of IFN therapy in IPF. Metaanalysis is a commonly used statistical technique whereby the results of individual studies can be pooled together by weighting them according to their standard errors. Since data from multiple studies are used, the precision of the pooled result is greater than that for each individual study. This technique has been widely used to generate hypotheses for subsequent randomized trials.
|
Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionMethods and MaterialsResultsReferences |
|---|
Study Selection
All retrieved information was assessed by two reviewers. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) they were randomized controlled trials with a reasonable control group; (2) enrolled patients met accepted clinical or pathologic criteria for the diagnosis of IPF; (3) IFN- was delivered for at least 6 months; and (4) mortality data were reported in the form of a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Information was extracted from Kaplan-Meier survival analyses that were reported in each study. Individual Kaplan-Meier graphs were digitally analyzed and used to compare survival at different durations of follow-up. The pooled differences in survival rates (ie, survival in the IFN group – survival in the control group) at five different time periods (ie, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and 650 days) were calculated and compared. Also, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from the individual survival curves and were combined according to the methods of Parmar and colleagues.16
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionMethods and MaterialsResultsReferences |
|---|
|
1b significantly decreased the mortality rate compared with control group therapies (pooled HR, 0.418; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.253 to 0.690; p = 0.0003) [Fig 1
]. Pooled differences in survival rates were computed for time points for which data were available in each study. There were significant improvements in survival (ie, proportion survived in IFN arm – proportion survived in control arm) at 1 year (0.0861; 95% CI, 0.0244 to 0.1478; p = 0.0063), 18 months (0.1682; 95% CI, 0.1065 to 0.2299; p < 0.0001), 650 days (0.1939; 95% CI 0.1386 to 0.2492; p < 0.0001), and 2 years (0.2652; 95% CI, 0.1652 to 0.3652; p < 0.0001), but not at 6 months (0.0046; 95% CI, –0.0364 to 0.0456; p = 0.82). Due to differences in trial design and the limited data available from each trial, subgroup analyses and analyses of outcomes other than survival were not possible. Within individual studies, IFN-1b therapy did not have any apparent effect on survival, apart from the long-term (as yet unpublished) results of one small study.19
|
1b showed significant efficacy in improving overall survival and survival at the time points of 1 year, 18 months, 650 days, and 2 years when compared with control group therapies. The results of this analysis are notable because of the novel finding that IFN-1b therapy may be efficacious in improving survival in patients with IPF. As noted earlier, essentially all previous therapeutic studies have failed to demonstrate a significant effect on survival in IPF.
It should be noted that one large study14 was responsible for the majority of patients included in this analysis. Despite the rigorous trial design, the high rate of medication adherence, and the low dropout rate, a significant result was not found in that study. With the addition of patients from the other studies, a statistically significant improvement in mortality became evident. However, one of the studies included in this analysis has not yet been published, while another relies on unpublished long-term follow-up from a previously reported study. The study by Ziesche and colleagues13 is unique in that the physiologic improvements associated with IFN-1b treatment in that trial have not been replicated to date. Questions have been raised about whether the patients included in the trial were truly representative of a general population of patients with IPF. For example, other studies420 that included patients with lower FVC have not demonstrated a similar benefit. This also raises the possibility that IFN-1b treatment may be most beneficial in patients with less advanced disease, as suggested by a subgroup analysis of the largest trial to date.14 Additionally, the unpublished study included in this report used colchicine in the control treatment arm. While colchicine has been included in treatment algorithms for IPF, no clear benefit has been associated with its use. However, its inclusion in the study could have affected the outcome, for example, by independently causing clinical improvement and biasing the results toward the null hypothesis.21
Two of the studies included here utilized corticosteroids as part of their treatment protocol,1318 while the third study14 allowed treating clinicians to utilize some corticosteroids but did not formally include them as part of the protocol. Although the effect of corticosteroids on the pathogenesis of IPF is incompletely understood, therapy using these agents has not been demonstrated to be beneficial,1 suggesting that they are unlikely to produce a clinically meaningful effect. However, the possibility of an interaction between corticosteroid and IFN-1b treatment (for both efficacy and toxicity) has not been excluded. As such, it is possible that our results have been confounded by the fact that corticosteroids were not employed equally in the studies included in our analysis.
Our analysis suggests that when the results of multiple studies are combined in a metaanalysis, IFN-1b treatment is associated with decreased mortality. Clinicians should be aware that, despite the results of published randomized trials, the existing data supporting the use of IFN-1b for treatment of IPF are more compelling than for any other therapy in patients with this devastating disease, and we think that equipoise remains regarding this therapy. Because we regard metaanalyses to be hypothesis-generating, we anxiously await the results of ongoing randomized controlled trials, which should definitively establish the role of IFN-1b therapy. We hope our findings will help to stimulate interest in the referral of patients to such trials.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Dr. Ayas was supported by a New Investigator Award from the CIHR and BC Lung Association, a Michael Smith Foundation Scholar Award, and a Departmental Scholar Award from the University of British Columbia Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Dr. Malhotra was supported by the American Heart Association and the National Institutes of Health (AG024837–01).
Received for publication October 6, 2004. Accepted for publication December 23, 2004.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionMethods and MaterialsResultsReferences |
|---|
therapy of end-stage pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167,953-957-1b therapy for advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78,1082-1087[ISI][Medline]
-interferon on collagen and histamine content in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in rats. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 1993;12,87-91[ISI][Medline]
-interferon on collagen synthesis by normal and fibrotic human lung fibroblasts. Chest 1992;101,1326-1331 on expression of cell surface receptors for collagen and deposition of newly synthesized collagen by cultured human lung fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 1989;83,1505-1511[ISI][Medline]
as the lymphokine that activates human macrophage oxidative metabolism and antimicrobial activity. J Exp Med 1983;158,670-689. J Exp Med 1984;160,600-605-1b and low-dose prednisolone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1999;341,1264-1269-1b in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2004;350,125-133-1b on biomarker expression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170,133-140-1b (IFN-) and colchicines in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: preliminary results of a prospective, multicenter randomized study. Paper presented at: the 99th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society; May 16–21, 2003, Seattle, WA
-1b. Paper presented at: CHEST 2002: the 68th annual meeting of American College of Chest Physicians; November 2–7, 2002; San Diego, CA
improve pulmonary function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Eur Respir J 2003;22,906-911This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. U. Wells Antioxidant therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: hope is kindled. Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 664 - 666. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
