|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
*From the Departments of Internal Medicine (Drs. Baughman, Lower, and Bradley) and Ophthalmology (Drs. Raymond and Kaufman), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Correspondence to: Robert P. Baughman MD, 1001 Holmes, Eden Ave, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0565; e-mail address bob.baughman{at}uc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects and methods: Eighteen patients with ocular sarcoidosis and ongoing inflammation in the eyes. All patients had received at least 6 months of therapy with methotrexate and were currently receiving corticosteroids. Patients were randomized to receive either etanercept, 25 mg subcutaneously twice a week, or placebo in a double-blind randomized trial. Treatment for ocular inflammation with systemic and local corticosteroids at the beginning and end of 6 months of treatment was noted. All patients underwent an ocular examination at the beginning and the end of the study by one ophthalmologist who was unaware of what treatment the patient was receiving.
Results: Three of the patients treated with etanercept and one treated with placebo were being treated with lower doses of corticosteroids by the end of the study. However, three of the etanercept patients and one of the placebo patients required larger doses of corticosteroids by the end of the study. The ophthalmology global assessment improved for two of the etanercept-treated patients and three of the placebo-treated patients.
Conclusion: For most patients, therapy with etanercept was not associated with a significant improvement in their chronic ocular disease.
Key Words: etanercept methotrexate ocular sarcoidosis tumor necrosis factor
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The treatment for uveitis includes therapy with corticosteroids, used topically, periocularly, and/or systemically.5 However, the long-term local and systemic use of corticosteroids is often associated with side effects, including cataracts and glaucoma.56 Because of these complications, alternatives to steroid therapy are often sought for the treatment of chronic uveitis. Among the immunosuppressive drugs, methotrexate has been commonly used.78 Although methotrexate is useful in many patients, incomplete control of the uveitis can sometimes occur.789
The monoclonal antibody infliximab binds tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and has been used successfully to treat chronic uveitis in patients with Behcet disease.10 We have also reported11 the utility of infliximab for the treatment of chronic sarcoidosis. However, none of those patients had ocular disease due to their sarcoidosis.
Etanercept is a TNF receptor antagonist that has been found to be as effective as infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.121314 We studied the effectiveness of etanercept in the treatment of patients with ocular sarcoidosis who have persistent disease despite treatment with methotrexate. In this study, we were unable to demonstrate a significant additional effect of etanercept.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Active eye disease was defined on the basis of new or recurrent eye disease, including cystoid macular edema or the presence of more than trace cells on slit lamp examination. Patients to whom a regimen of topical steroids applied four or more times a day was prescribed were considered to have active disease, as well as patients who had received a periocular injection of corticosteroids within a month of randomization. In patients who had received an intraocular injection, the examination findings at the time of the injection were used as the baseline data. Patients with posterior uveitis were examined specifically for evidence of pars planitis. We defined pars planitis as a chronic inflammatory process in the pars plane, associated with snowballs and snowbanking.4
All patients gave a focused medical history, and a physical examination assessed extraocular organ involvement. In addition, a chest roentgenogram, FVC measurement, serum liver function studies, serum calcium level, and a CBC count were obtained at the time of the screening visit. The presence of definite or probable organ involvement due to sarcoidosis was determined using a previously described organ system score.17
Patients were then randomized to receive either etanercept, 25 mg, or an equal volume of physiologic saline solution subcutaneously twice a week for 6 months. Patients were seen monthly to assess for local toxicity from the injections. They were seen every 2 months for a CBC count, and liver and renal function studies to monitor methotrexate toxicity while participating in the study. Patients were followed up for a total of 7 months, including 1 month after withdrawal of the study drug to monitor for the worsening of symptoms.
The ophthalmologist saw the patient initially and at the end of 6 months of therapy. The patients continued receiving treatment with etanercept or placebo until the ophthalmologist could see them at the follow-up examination. In some cases, the patients may have received as much as 2 extra weeks of treatment before they could be evaluated. There was no significant difference in the number of days the etanercept group received compared to the placebo group. The ophthalmologist conducted a detailed examination, including visual acuity, external examination, slitlamp biomicroscopy, pressure measurement, and dilated vitreous and fundus examinations. An examination conducted with the pupil dilated with indirect ophthalmoscopy and scleral indentation was performed every 3 to 6 months. A slitlamp examination was also performed every 1 to 3 months. Fluorescein angiography to detect retinal vasculitis and macular edema was performed as indicated.
One ophthalmologist (A.K.) evaluated all 18 of the patients initially and at the end of the study. A retinal specialist (L.R.) saw 10 of these patients during the course of the study. All patients were seen in the interstitial lung disease and sarcoidosis clinic (by R.B. and E.L.) at least once every month. Changes in systemic therapy, including the use of prednisone and methotrexate, were made in this clinic on the advice of the ophthalmologists. None of the physicians was aware of whether the patient was receiving etanercept or placebo.
We assessed the ocular outcome in two ways. The dose of corticosteroids either systemically or topical initially and at 6 months was compared. In addition, if a patient had received a periocular injection of corticosteroids after month 4, the patient was assumed to have worsening disease. In addition, one ophthalmologist (A.K.) provided his global assessment of whether the patient was better or worse after 6 months of therapy. This assessment was provided before the blind was broken.
The primary end point of the study was the change of the ophthalmologist examination after 6 months of therapy. This was based on a specific evaluation by one ophthalmologist (A.K.) who was unaware of which treatment the patient was receiving. The routine examinations by the treating ophthalmologists could take place every 1 to 6 months, usually every 2 months. These evaluations led to changes in the patients therapy, including the changes in topical corticosteroids, the use of periocular corticosteroid injections, and changes in systemic corticosteroids, as indicated. This was the other end point of the study that we reported. The patient was also seen every 2 months to monitor for toxicity from methotrexate and the study medications. These visits were to nonophthalmologists (R.B. and E.L.), and the patients were evaluated in a sarcoidosis clinic.
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between groups were made using nonparametric techniques. These included the Mann Whitney U test and the
2 test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Based on our prior clinical experience with the use of methotrexate for the treatment of ocular sarcoidosis,9 we projected that the condition of < 10% of patients would improve with placebo therapy after receiving methotrexate for at least 6 months. Our study was powered to show a significant improvement if half of the patients responded to etanercept.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1 summarizes the demographics of the remaining 18 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Extraocular involvement at any time was seen in all patients in the study. Table 2 summarizes the organ involvement seen for the two groups, with no differences between the groups. At no time during the study did extrapulmonary manifestations require additional systemic therapy. The percent predicted FVC for the etanercept group was lower than that for the placebo group, but this difference was not significant. We did not routinely measure the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide.
|
|
|
|
|
Four patients had infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract that were treated successfully with antibiotics. Two patients received etanercept, while two patients received placebo. Two patients developed rashes; both were receiving the placebo. One patient complained of mild diarrhea, which not associated with antibiotics. This patient was receiving the placebo. No severe adverse reactions were encountered with medication.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alveolar macrophages retrieved by BAL from sarcoidosis patients have been shown to release increased amounts of TNF.181920 Successful therapy for sarcoidosis with either a corticosteroid or methotrexate has been associated with a decrease in the amount of TNF released by alveolar macrophages.21 In a study of patients with refractory sarcoidosis who were not responding to corticosteroid therapy, TNF release by alveolar macrophages was not suppressed by systemic therapy.22
The decision to study an anti-TNF drug for use in the treatment of sarcoidosis uveitis was based on the observation that several agents used for the treatment of sarcoidosis are effective in blocking TNF release.23 These drugs include methotrexate,21 azathioprine,24 pentoxifylline,25 and thalidomide.26 Infliximab, a chimeric antibody to TNF, has been reported112728 as being useful for the treatment of refractory sarcoidosis.
The primary end point of the study was to determine whether etanercept could be steroid-sparing. There was no significant reduction in the dosage of the topical, injected, or systemic corticosteroids used in the etanercept group vs those used in the placebo group. Although this was a small study, our previous studies29 using methotrexate demonstrated systemic steroid reduction with a similar small sample size. In trials of anti-TNF agents for the treatment of advanced rheumatoid arthritis, more than half of the patients treated with etanercept have shown a remarkable improvement with therapy.1314 In a double-blind study of etanercept for the treatment of chronic uveitis that was controlled with low-dose methotrexate, Foster et al30 withdrew the methotrexate from therapy over a 6-month period. There was no significant difference between the etanercept-treated patients and the placebo-treated patients.30 None of the patients in that study had sarcoidosis. In an open-label trial31 of etanercept for the treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis, the drug was also not thought to be effective.
In addition to assessing the steroid treatment doses, we used a global opinion offered by the treating physician, who was unaware of the patients therapy. This scoring system found no significant difference between therapy with etanercept and that with placebo. There were two patients receiving etanercept and one patient receiving placebo whose conditions improved, but there were as many patients whose conditions became worse.
It is possible with our small sample size that we did not detect a few patients who would benefit from etanercept therapy. This was also noted in a prior study31 of patients with pulmonary disease. However, the use of the drug itself carried some risk, including local reaction at the injection site and some concerns about the response to serious infections while receiving the drug.323334 There is also significant cost for the drug. Our original sample size was based on the idea that the drug would need to work in more than half of the patients to justify its use in patients with ocular sarcoidosis.
Infliximab is another anti-TNF agent with a different mechanism of action. It not only binds free TNF, but it has been shown to bind to cell-surface TNF, activate complement TNF, and lead to cell lysis.3536 This lysis is of cells releasing TNF and potentially other cytokines. This difference is, in effect, one possible reason for the effectiveness of infliximab treatment for Crohn disease,37 for which etanercept therapy has not proven to be beneficial.38
The blood levels of anti-TNF are lower after the subcutaneous injection of etanercept compared to the doses of infliximab that were used. Since these drugs may have to pass into the vitreous to be effective in treating ocular sarcoidosis, this may be an issue with etanercept. A report39 of patients with joint and ocular disease demonstrated that while etanercept was effective at treating the joint disease, it was ineffective in treating the eye disease in most patients. Interestingly, a few patients in this retrospective study were treated with infliximab and their eye disease seemed to respond. Infliximab has also been shown40 to be effective for the treatment of Behcet eye disease.
Etanercept was well-tolerated in the current study. However, it was not associated with a marked improvement in patients with chronic ocular sarcoidosis. The use of other anti-TNF agents to treat ocular disease requires further study.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This research was supported in part by Immunex.
Received for publication August 11, 2004. Accepted for publication January 13, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and interleukin-6 but not interleukin-1ß. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1994;10,506-513[Abstract]
release of alveolar macrophages in corticosteroid resistant sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2002;19,185-190[ISI][Medline]
therapy. Ann Intern Med 2001;135,27-31
monoclonal antibody cA2 binds recombinant transmembrane TNF-
and activates immune effector functions. Cytokine 1995;7,251-259[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |