|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Cardiology (Drs. Martínez-Sellés, Pérez-David, and Bueno), Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón," Madrid; and Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (Dr. López-Palop), Murcia, Spain.
Correspondence to: Héctor Bueno, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón," Dr. Esquerdo, 46. 28007, Madrid, Spain; e-mail: hecbueno{at}jet.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical records. Gender differences in management and prognosis were assessed by stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis.
Setting: University, large-volume, tertiary hospital.
Patients: We studied 1,178 consecutive patients admitted to our coronary care unit with an acute inferior or posterior MI, and evaluated the influence of gender on clinical management and outcome.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and results: Women were older (73 years vs 66 years), had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, presented later (8 h vs 6 h after symptom onset), and had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (26% vs 9%) [all p values < 0.01]. Women underwent reperfusion therapy (45% vs 61%, p < 0.01), noninvasive studies (30% vs 62%, p < 0.001), and coronary angiography (34% vs 48%, p < 0.01) less often than men. Multivariable analysis revealed that female gender was an independent predictor of a lower use of noninvasive studies (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.63; p < 0.005) and coronary angiography (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.93; p = 0.02). A significant interaction between age and gender was found (p = 0.002); therefore, women
75 years old had a much lower probability of undergoing noninvasive tests and coronary angiography than men of the same age.
Conclusion: Despite their worse prognosis, women undergo noninvasive studies and coronary angiography less frequently than men after an acute inferior or posterior MI. The gender gap increases in patients
75 years old.
Key Words: age angiography gender myocardial infarction noninvasive studies
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inferior/posterior-wall infarcts represent nearly half of all ST-segment elevation MIs. Although the prognosis of inferior/posterior MI is believed to be more benign than that of anterior MI, it is more heterogeneous as there are patients with a very good prognosissuch as those with isolated posterior infarctsand high-risk subgroups, such as patients showing right ventricular involvement,9 particularly if they are older,10 have ST-segment depression in anterolateral leads,11 or have high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block.12 Therefore, the absolute benefit of reperfusion therapy differs to a larger extent among the subgroups of inferior/posterior MI than among patients with infarcts of anterior location.1314 This heterogeneous prognosis could lead to an increased variability in the clinical management of patients with inferior/posterior MI. It has been described that women with acute MI are, as a group, subjected to greater variations in the use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources than men.5 This gender-related variability may be increased in a group of patients with a heterogeneous prognosis and response to treatment such as those with inferior or posterior MI. Thus, the present study was designed to assess the influence of gender on the clinical management of patients with acute inferior or posterior MI and their hospital outcome.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.1 mV or Q-waves in two or more inferior leads in the admission ECG and/or development of an R wave in V1 or V2 > 0.04 s with an R/S voltage ratio > 1; and at least one of the following: (1) chest discomfort
30 min compatible with myocardial ischemia, or (2) elevation of serum creatine kinase (CK) level to at least twice the upper normal limit (195 U/L in our institution), with an MB fraction > 10% of the total CK level. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Statistical Analysis
Means (± SD) are reported for continuous variables. The
2 test was used to assess the significance of the differences between proportions, and Student t test was used for comparisons between means. Gender differences in the use of reperfusion therapy (fibrinolytic therapy and primary PCI) were assessed in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis that included all prognostic factors available at the time of hospital admission: age, risk factors, shock at hospital admission, previous MI, and delay to hospital admission. The independent association of gender with the use of noninvasive tests and coronary angiography was evaluated in patients not treated with primary PCI who survived hospitalization, also considering other variables obtained during admission (left ventricular ejection fraction, complete AV block). The influence of gender on in-hospital outcome was adjusted for all the variables previously mentioned. The presence of increasing gender differences with age was tested by including a sex-age interaction in all models. All probability values are two tailed.
As patients admitted during years 1996 and 1997 were added to the original data set, a subanalysis was performed with these patients, showing a slight increase in the use of reperfusion therapy in both genders, compared with patients included during the years 1990 to 1995. However, as gender-related differences and in-hospital mortality remained similar in both populations, the analyses were performed with the whole group. All analyses were performed using statistical software (Version 11.0; SPSS; Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
75 years old (p value for sex-age interaction, 0.002). Among hospital survivors who were not treated by primary PCI, noninvasive tests were performed in 8% of women
75 years old and in 33% of men
75 years old (adjusted OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.36; p
0.0005).
Coronary Angiography
Women had a lower chance than men to undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization. The gender difference persisted after adjustment for confounding variables (adjusted OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.93; p = 0.02) [Table 3]. Age had an important effect on the relation between gender and the use of coronary angiography (p value for sex/age interaction, 0.002). While women < 75 years old were referred for coronary angiography as frequently as men (adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.31; p = 0.7), it was performed less frequently in older women (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.72, p = 0.002).
In-hospital Mortality
The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 26% for women and 9% for men (p < 0.0005) [Table 2]. The higher mortality of women was observed in younger and older patients. However, after adjustment for clinical dissimilarities, we only found a nonsignificant trend toward a higher in-hospital death rate in women (Table 3).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75 years old compared with older men (7% vs 27%). Although in-hospital mortality rates were 26% in women and 9% in men, we found a nonsignificant trend toward a higher death rate in women after adjustment for confounding factors. However, we did not find a significant interaction between age and gender in mortality because there was a consistent increase in mortality across all age subgroups. These findings are in contrast to previous studies16 that reported a higher hospital mortality in younger women but not in older women compared with men of the same age, but are concordant with others1718 that found a higher mortality in older women. The reasons for this discrepancy are unknown, but the type of MIs analyzed may play a role. In the present study, only patients with confirmed inferior or posterior infarcts were included. Our results are similar to those found by the studies1718 that only recruited patients with ST-segment elevation or Q-wave MIs, and differ from the study by Vaccarino et al,16 in which roughly half of the patients presented with ST-segment elevation MIs.
Inability to perform a stress test after an acute MI is a powerful predictor of long-term mortality, particularly in older patients.19 In our study, noninvasive studies were performed in women less often. As women were on average 12 years older, it is likely that factors such as a poorer functional capacity and a lower degree of mobility influenced the rate of use of treadmill tests. Although the lower specificity of noninvasive tests in women reported previously202122 may have also played a role, this would not explain the lower utilization of noninvasive tests in younger women or the lack of use of alternative studies such as pharmacologic stress tests, which are helpful in postinfarction risk stratification in older patients.23 Moreover, if inability to perform were the cause of the lower rate of use of stress tests in women, a higher rate of coronary angiography would be expected among them.
Previous studies4567 have shown that women are less likely than men to undergo coronary angiography after MI, and that failure to perform coronary angiography after MI is associated with an increased short-term mortality risk, particularly in the elderly.72425 Our study shows that older women with inferior or posterior MI are at the highest mortality risk but undergo coronary angiography less often than men. Gan et al4 found that women
65 years old were significantly less likely than men to undergo catheterization. However, even in this elderly population, this difference was more pronounced at older ages. Alter et al6 also found a lower rate of coronary angiography within the first 6 months after MI in women, particularly in the oldest patients. The reasons why older women are less frequently scheduled for invasive studies are unknown. Rathore et al26 showed that the lower rates of cardiac catheterization in older women occur primarily in patients with equivocal diagnosis of ischemic heart disease, but that is not the case in our cohort, in which all patients had confirmed MI.
Our study shows an age-related increase in the gender difference in the of noninvasive studies and coronary angiography, which is not explained by clinical characteristics. Although other reasons such as nonregistered comorbidities,27 differences in quality of life, functional status, mental disorders,28 and patient refusal to undergo invasive or noninvasive studies could have contributed to the disparity, it is unlikely that they explain the large gender gap in the use of these resources, particularly in the oldest. Therefore, we cannot formally exclude that a gender bias may be partially behind this gap, particularly among the oldest patients.
Limitations
This observational study shows the routine management of patients with acute inferior or posterior MI, so the ultimate causes for the use or nonuse of specific interventions are frequently unknown. Although we registered several clinical features, we could not account for factors such as quality of life, noncardiac comorbidity, functional status, and patient preferences, which may influence the process of decision making, particularly the use of coronary angiography, so the degree of appropriateness in the use of the diagnostic and therapeutic resources could not be calculated. Finally, although the research was conducted in a large-volume teaching hospital, it is a single center study where the vast majority of staff members are men in a country where coronary angiography after MI is not routine practice, and therefore our results may not be extrapolated.
In conclusion, women with acute inferior or posterior MI have a worse prognosis than men but undergo noninvasive tests and coronary angiography less frequently during hospitalization. This gap is not explained by the differences in clinical characteristics, and increases with age. Our results should be interpreted as an opportunity to improve the care of women with acute MI, particularly the elderly.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Drs. Martínez-Sellés and López-Palop contributed equally to this article.
Presented in part at XXIII Congress of the European Society of Cardiology. Stockholm, Sweden, August 15, 2001.
Received for publication February 18, 2004. Accepted for publication March 2, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |