|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||

* From the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Asheville, NC.
Lists of the members of the ACCP Committee for Clinical Practice Guidelines on Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery and the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center Staff are located in the Appendix.
Correspondence to: Peter McKeown, MBBS, MPH, MPA, FCCP, Department of Surgery, VAMC, 1100 Tunnel Rd, Asheville, NC 28805; e-mail: peter.mckeown{at}med.va.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: anticoagulation atrial fibrillation cardioversion coronary artery bypass graft thromboembolism ventricular response rate
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AF after cardiac surgery is a common problem that adds to morbidity and significantly increases costs.3 In a review of the literature, Maisel et al4 suggested that the incidence of post-cardiac surgery atrial arrhythmias ranged from 10 to 65%. An overall incidence of 26.7% was determined from a metaanalysis of 24 trials.5 The incidence is lower for isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery than for valve surgery or for combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.45 The onset of postoperative AF usually occurs on the second or third postoperative day. There is a threefold to fourfold increase in the risk of stroke in patients with AF.67 Early anticoagulation therapy reduces the risk of stroke but carries the risk of bleeding and cardiac tamponade.
The American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Epidemiology developed and published a set of guidelines for the management of patients with AF in 2001.2 Limited attention was focused on postoperative AF.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality also addressed AF in a review published8 in conjunction with the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center. However, the specific management of AF in cardiac surgery patients was not addressed.
The risk factors for postoperative AF include the following: increased age; hypertension; rheumatic heart disease; increased intraoperative ischemic times; left ventricular hypertrophy; preoperative use of digoxin; peripheral vascular disease; and obstructive lung disease.4 There is also evidence of a genetic predisposition.9
The main issues that arise in managing patients with postoperative AF include the following:
Each of these topics is covered within separate chapters of this review.
While published guidelines have addressed the management of chronic AF, including the risk of stroke, the evidence for best practices in treating that subset of patients with AF associated with cardiac surgery has not been separately addressed. It was this gap in the literature that prompted the current evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG). The panel members for this evidence-based CPG were selected by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), and include liaison representatives from the American College of Cardiology, the American College of Surgeons, the Society for Thoracic Surgeons, and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. To remove the potential for bias on the part of those reviewing evidence and making recommendations based on the evidence, the Health and Science Policy Committee incorporated several relevant specialists in each writing group, such as a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, and an anesthesiologist. The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center was selected to perform a comprehensive literature review and scoring assessment of the evidence.
The methodology for grading evidence and making recommendations was modified from the methodology used for the ACCP guidelines for antithrombotic therapy.10 The methodological approach is described in detail in the article by Fleisher et al in this supplement. The reporting design is new and was developed by the Health and Science Policy Committee of the ACCP as a unified format for future guideline publications.
There is strong evidence that CPGs can improve clinical outcomes.1112 This guideline for the management of patients with postoperative AF is only a first step toward improving clinical outcomes for patients with this condition. The dissemination, implementation, and evaluation of changes in the behavior of health-care professionals as a result of guideline development is an essential prerequisite to improved patient care. The full implementation of this and other CPGs requires the recognition by physicians and institutions of the net benefit of evidence-based medicine. Physicians must be willing to modify their opinions and behavior when evidence indicates that to do so improves outcomes.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center Staff
Eric Bass, MD; David Bradley, MD; Lee Fleisher, MD (Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists); Elizabeth Martinez, MD; William Masiel, MD; Lisa Lubomski; and Rachel Slacum.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |