|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Pulmonary and Critical Care (Drs. Aronow, Sidana, Maguire, and Lehrman) and Cardiology Divisions (Drs. Ravipati, McClung, and Belkin), Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Correspondence to: Wilbert S. Aronow, MD, FCCP, Cardiology Division, New York Medical College, Macy Pavilion, Room 138, Valhalla, NY 10595; e-mail: WSAronow{at}aol.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: We investigated the association of DLCO with LVDD in 105 patients with a mean ± SD body mass index of 49 ± 5 kg/m2. An abnormal DLCO was < 80%. LVDD was investigated by Doppler and by tissue Doppler echocardiography. The Doppler echocardiographic data were analyzed blindly without knowledge of the clinical characteristics or whether the DLCO was normal or abnormal.
Setting: A university hospital.
Patients: The 105 patients included 19 men and 86 women (mean age, 45 ± 9 years).
Results: An abnormal DLCO was present in 62 of 105 patients (59%). Moderate or severe LVDD was present in 35 of 105 patients (33%). Moderate or severe LVDD was present in 25 of 62 patients (40%) with an abnormal DLCO and in 10 of 43 patients (23%) with a normal DLCO (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Obese patients with a decreased DLCO have an increased prevalence of moderate or severe LVDD.
Key Words: carbon monoxide diffusing capacity diastolic dysfunction echocardiography obesity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have reported that in obese persons with obstructive sleep apnea, an increased prevalence of moderate-to-severe left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) that predisposes them to diastolic heart failure.7 This correlation of LVDD with obstructive sleep apnea was also demonstrated by Fung et al.8
To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of LVDD in patients with reduced DLCO has not been previously reported. This article reports a higher prevalence of moderate or severe LVDD in morbidly obese patients with reduced DLCO than in morbidly obese patients with a normal DLCO.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary function tests were conducted by one of two technicians using standardized equipment. Pulmonary function data were recorded with the patients in the sitting position. The DLCO was calculated with a single-breath test. An abnormal DLCO was considered < 80%. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines9 were used to evaluate the presence of obstructive lung disease. The DLCO was measured without knowledge of whether LVDD was present or absent.
Doppler and tissue Doppler interrogation of the mitral inflow and mitral annulus, respectively, were performed in 20 obese persons referred for echocardiography prior to gastric bypass surgery. Mitral inflow recordings were obtained with the pulsed Doppler sample volume at the level of the mitral leaflet tips during the maximal opening in diastole. Pulmonary vein recordings were obtained with the sample volume positioned in the right paraseptal vein in the apical four-chamber view. Recordings of mitral inflow with the Valsalva maneuver were not generally performed. Studies were recorded on videotape or stored digitally for off-line review.
LVDD was evaluated and classified using previously described parameters.10 Moderate LVDD was diagnosed if the peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E)/peak late diastolic transmitral flow velocity ratio was 0.75 to 1.50 and one or both of the following were present: the E/peak early diastolic myocardial velocity ratio was
10, or the peak systolic pulmonary vein flow velocity/peak diastolic pulmonary vein flow velocity ratio was < 1.10 Severe LVDD was diagnosed if the E/peak late diastolic transmitral flow velocity ratio was > 1.5 and one or both of the following were present: the E/peak early diastolic myocardial velocity ratio was
10, or the peak systolic pulmonary vein flow velocity/peak diastolic pulmonary vein flow velocity ratio was < 1.10 LVDD was evaluated blindly by a single experienced echocardiographer without knowledge of the clinical characteristics or whether a normal or abnormal DLCO was present.
Hypertension was diagnosed if the patient was being treated with antihypertensive medication, or if the systolic BP was
140 mm Hg, or the diastolic BP was
90 mm Hg. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed if the patient was being treated for diabetes mellitus or the fasting blood sugar on two occasions was
126 mg/dL. Hypercholesterolemia was diagnosed if the patient was being treated for hypercholesterolemia or if the fasting serum total cholesterol was
200 mg/dL.
Student t test were used to analyze continuous variables.
2 tests were used to analyze dichotomous variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The occurrence of a gas exchange abnormality has been shown to be a powerful independent predictor of a worse prognosis in patients with stable chronic heart failure.5 In the presence of heart failure, lung capillaries are subjected to increased pressure and increased volume. An acute stepwise increase in pulmonary microvascular pressure as well as mechanical insult trigger a morphologic disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier that leads to a transition from a hydrostatic and low-permeability form to a high-permeability form of pulmonary edema.12 This stress failure process is the result of alveolar membrane exposure to increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary capillary stasis.12
However, recurrent injury to the alveolar capillary interface and contribution from neurohormonal, cytotoxic, and genetic expression may further injure lung capillary and alveolar spaces, leading to a remodeling process characterized by increased thickness of the alveolar capillary membrane. The increased amount of fluid leaking across the alveolar-capillary membrane leads to prolongation of the diffusion path for gas exchange.121314
The increased prevalence of a decreased DLCO in our patients suggests that LVDD acts in a similar mechanism at the level of the pulmonary capillary, leading to increased pressure and volume. The fact that some of our patients with LVDD did not demonstrate a reduction in DLCO is attributable possibly to the duration of their LVDD. It may also be explained by the presence of subclinical pulmonary vascular congestion leading to an acute increase in DLCO before chronic adaptive changes have developed.15
By demonstrating a decreased DLCO in morbidly obese patients with LVDD, our study highlights a possible mechanism of exercise intolerance and dyspnea in this subset of patients. It also suggests a possible role for using DLCO as a surrogate marker for prognosis to monitor progression of LVDD and for correlation with the degree of dyspnea and exercise performance. In conclusion, we found that obese patients with a reduced DLCO have an increased prevalence of moderate or severe LVDD.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication February 16, 2005. Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |