|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Danish Pediatric Asthma Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
Correspondence to: Hans Bisgaard, MD, DMSci, Danish Pediatric Asthma Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2900 Gentofte, Niels Andersensvej 79, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark; e-mail: Bisgaard{at}copsac.dk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the value of FeNO as a predictor of EIB in asthmatic children.
Methods: Stable outpatient asthmatic school children performed standard exercise challenge tests and measurement of FeNO.
Results: FeNO and response to a standardized submaximal exercise test on the treadmill were measured in 111 school children with asthma. EIB could be excluded with a probability of 90% in asthmatic children with FeNO levels < 20 parts per billion (ppb) without current inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and < 12 ppb in children with current inhaled corticosteroid treatment.
Conclusion: Measurement of FeNO is a simple, and time- and resource-efficient tool that may be used to screen for EIB testing and therefore optimizes the resources for exercise testing in pediatric asthma monitoring.
Key Words: children exercise-induced bronchoconstriction FeNO prediction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) reflects asthma control in children as assessed by ß2-agonist use, symptoms, and reversibility,3 and is correlated to BHR and total eosinophil count in children treated with inhaled corticosteroids.4 FeNO reflects the response to anti-inflammatory treatment5 and predicts loss of control before clinical symptoms appear.6 Measurement of FeNO is a rapid and noninvasive procedure that can be performed from the age of 5 to 7 years.7
It was the hypothesis of this study that FeNO measurements may be used to prescreen children with asthma, excluding the need for exercise testing if FeNO measurements were near normal, and focusing the suspicion of EIB on those children with elevated FeNO. The aim of this study was to evaluate FeNO as a predictor of EIB in children with a documented clinical history of asthma in order to select those who require exercise testing.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
Asthmatic children from 6 to 15 years old with mild-to-moderate asthma were recruited from an outpatient pediatric asthma clinic. The diagnosis was determined from a well-known symptom history compatible with asthma, response to inhaled ß2-agonists or corticosteroids, or previous significant decrease in lung function after standardized exercise testing. Asthma was stable and considered clinically well controlled in all patients. Treatment had remained unchanged within the last 4 weeks. Current smokers and children with an airway infection within the previous fortnight were excluded.
Exercise Challenge Test
Exercise challenge test was performed according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines.8 Each child exercised 6 min on a motor-driven treadmill with a 10° steepness and adjustable speed. A submaximal workload corresponding to a pulse rate of 180 beats/min was maintained during the last 4 min, and was monitored by telemetry. During exercise, the child breathed absolutely dehumidified atmospheric air through a facemask preventing nasal respiration (Hans Rudolph; Kansas City, MO). Lung function was measured before, and 1, 3, 5, and 15 min after exercise. EIB was defined as a
15% decrease in FEV1 from baseline within the first 5 min after exercise.
Spirometry
Spirometry was performed (MasterScreen; Jäeger; Würzburg, Germany) in accordance with ATS guidelines.9
Exhaled NO
FeNO measurements were performed before exercise testing. Single-breath, on-line measurement of FeNO was performed in accordance with ATS10 and European Respiratory Society11 recommendations at an exhalation flow of 50 mL/s (Aerocrine NO system; Aerocrine AB; Stockholm, Sweden; and CLD 77 AM chemiluminescence analyzer; Eco Physics AG; Duernten, Switzerland). The use of this equipment is well documented.12
Statistics
Standard statistical methods were applied,13 and computer software (MedCalc version 6; MedCalc Software; Mariakerke, Belgium) was used for statistical calculations. According to whether the data represented a normal distribution or not (controlled by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), mean (lung function data) or median (FeNO data) values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, respectively. Similarly, to compare groups either t test or Wilcoxon analysis were used. Proportions were tested by
2 test. Sensitivity (true-positive rate), specificity (true-negative rate), and positive/negative predictive values (probability that the child has/has not EIB according to FeNO cut-off value) were calculated. Positive cases were defined as children with significant decrease in lung function after exercise. The cut-off values of FeNO were found by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis as the values with the highest accuracy (minimal false-negative and false-positive results ie, FeNO below the cut-off value and significant EIB and vice versa). The prevalence of disease used in the analysis was estimated by the ratio of positive and negative cases in the data set. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
400 µg; medium dose > 400 to < 800 µg, and high dose
800 µg budesonide or equivalent) did not significantly alter the ROC curve analysis (data not shown). In children receiving
800 µg budesonide, a FeNO
10 ppb has 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for EIB. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were higher compared to specificity and positive predictive values. The full ROC curve analysis is presented in Table 3
and Figures 1 and 2
.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate FeNO for the prediction of EIB in asthmatic children. This pediatric population had clinically verified asthma and was therefore attending our outpatient clinic. El Halawani et al14 reported a cut-off value of 12 ppb as the best predictor of a positive exercise challenge test result with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 31%, 19%, and 100%, respectively. However, in their study,14 measurement of FeNO was used as a screening tool to diagnose asthma in subjects with complaints of abnormal dyspnea on exercise but without a verified asthma diagnosis. In contrast, our aim is to use FeNO to improve quality of care in children with diagnosed asthma by identifying the subpopulation that should be evaluated by exercise testing to reveal uncontrolled EIB.
We analyzed the data in steroid-naïve and corticosteroid-treated children separately. Analysis of the ROC curve in steroid-naïve children suggested a cut-off value of approximately 20 ppb, which, coincidentally, is similar to the upper limit (mean + 2 SD) of normal values in healthy children.15 FeNO is decreased by anti-inflammatory treatment16; hence, the cut-off for children receiving inhaled corticosteroids was lower (12 ppb) than in steroid-naïve children. Nearly 50% of the steroid-treated children reactive to exercise have increased FeNO (> 20 ppb) despite current inhaled corticosteroid treatment (data not shown), and the predicted FeNO cut-off values were not significantly affected by current dose of inhaled corticosteroid (the daily dose of budesonide ranged from 100 to 1,600 µg). This confirms the results from our previous study15 that FeNO in some children was not affected by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
In our study, all subjects included were tested irrespective of a history of respiratory symptoms during exercise. Despite apparently being well controlled, > 25% of this unselected population of asthmatic children showed EIB, which emphasizes the relevance of such exercise testing, but also suggests that a large number of tests could have been avoided by screening with FeNO. Even though the study population differed in asthma severity, all children were clinically stable at the time of measurement, and we believe that the results can be directly applied to clinical practice and used as guidance for a more accurate selection of asthmatic children eligible for exercise testing. In conclusion, FeNO measurement is a cost-saving procedure that can be used in pediatric asthma management as a rapid and feasible screening tool to assess the need for exercise testing in children with asthma.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 4, 2004. Accepted for publication February 25, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Lim and C. Mottram The Use of Fraction of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Pulmonary Practice Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1232 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kostikas, A. I. Papaioannou, K. Tanou, A. Koutsokera, M. Papala, and K. I. Gourgoulianis Portable Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Screening Tool for Asthma in Young Adults During Pollen Season Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 906 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Duong, P. Subbarao, E. Adelroth, G. Obminski, T. Strinich, M. Inman, S. Pedersen, and P. M. O'Byrne Sputum Eosinophils and the Response of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction to Corticosteroid in Asthma Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 404 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Hermansen, K. G. Nielsen, F. Buchvald, J. J. Jespersen, T. Bengtsson, and H. Bisgaard Acute Relief of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction by Inhaled Formoterol in Children With Persistent Asthma Chest, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1203 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |