|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Pneumology (Drs. Martínez-García and Soler-Cataluña) and Neurology Units (Dr. Galiano-Blancart), and Service of Internal Medicine (Drs. Román-Sánchez, Cabero-Salt, and Salcedo-Maiques), Requena General Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Correspondence to: Miguel Ángel Martínez-García, MD, Hospital General de Requena, Unidad de Neumología (Servicio de Medicina Interna), Paraje Casa Blanca s/n, 46320-Requena, Valencia, Spain; e-mail: med013413{at}nacom.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Prospective study.
Patients and interventions: Demographic data, vascular risk factors, clinical manifestations associated to sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, and neurologic parameters were recorded in a group of patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke at least 2 months previously. A polygraphic study was carried out 2 months after the acute episode in all patients, with the prescription of CPAP in the event of an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)
20. Two groups were defined: patients who could tolerate CPAP (group 1), and patients who could not tolerate CPAP after 1 month of initial adaptation (group 2). Patients with an AHI < 20 were excluded. The incidence of new vascular events was evaluated throughout follow-up (18 months) in all patients, with an analysis of the role of CPAP in protecting the patients against such events.
Results: Ninety-five patients were studied. Fifty-one patients (53.7%; mean age, 72.7 ± 9.4 years [± SD]) presented with an AHI
20, and 15 patients (29.4%) tolerated CPAP. The incidence of new vascular events was greater in group 2 (6.7%) vs group 1 (36.1%; long-rank, p = 0.03). Intolerance of CPAP increased the probability of a new vascular event fivefold (odds ratio, 5.09) adjusted for other vascular risk factors and neurologic indexes.
Conclusions: We concluded that CPAP treatment during 18 months in patients with an AHI
20 afforded significant protection against new vascular events after ischemic stroke.
Key Words: continuous positive airway pressure ischemic stroke sleep apnea vascular events
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relation between SAHS and ischemic stroke has been the subject of much debate in recent years. Different studies68 have shown an excessive presence of obstructive respiratory events weeks after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) following stabilization of the neurologic process. However, an excess of SAHS-related symptoms prior to stroke has been reported.1314 These observations suggest that independently of the existence of a transient worsening of SAHS as a result of stroke in its acute phase,8 many cases of obstructive SAHS could precede the latter and act as a risk factor for new cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, although no conclusive demonstration of a causal relation has been forthcoming to date.
Stroke is known to be the first cause of incapacitation in the Western world.15 The risk of a recurrent vascular event (VE) in patients who have had ischemic stroke is estimated to be 13 to 14% during the first year and increases 6% each year thereafter.16 If the hypothesis identifying SAHS as a risk factor for ischemic stroke were correct, then long-term CPAP treatment of stroke patients could help reduce the number of new VEs and the associated morbidity/mortality. However, this possibility has not been evaluated to date (and to our knowledge). The present study analyzes the role of CPAP treatment during 18 months in the prevention of new cerebrovascular or cardiovascular events in individuals who have had ischemic stroke or TIA.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessment of Stroke and VRFs
The diagnosis and location of ischemic stroke or TIA were determined by a neurologist, based on evaluation of the existing neurologic defects and of brain CT scans conducted in the first few hours after patient admission to the emergency department, and again several days later. Stroke subtypes were classified according to the Oxfordshire classification.17 Functional disability and neurologic impairment at hospital admission were evaluated using widely used neurologic scales: the Barthel index,18 which assesses daily activity on a scale of 0 to 100 (a score of 100 corresponding to full patient autonomy) and the Canadian scale,19 quantifying stroke-related symptoms severity from 0 to 10 (decreasing scores indicating greater severity).
Data were collected in all patients on the existence of the following VRFs: internal carotid stenosis (stenosis affecting > 50% of the vascular lumen) assessed by continuous Doppler flowmetry, transcranial Doppler flowmetry, and with magnetic resonance angiographic confirmation where appropriate; body mass index (BMI); current smoking (> 10 cigarettes per day); AHT (defined according to World Health Organization criteria20 or by the current use of antihypertensive drugs); the number of antihypertensive drugs taken; hypercholesterolemia (> 250 mg/dL in peripheral blood); diabetes mellitus; atrial fibrillation (AF); ischemic heart disease; and fibrinogen concentration in peripheral blood. Poorly controlled AHT was defined by persistent pressure values in excess of the normal values according to World Health Organization criteria despite correct adhesion to the prescribed antihypertensive medication. Following stroke, all patients received usual antiplatelet treatment. In the presence of AF, treatment was moreover started with oral anticoagulants to maintain the international normalized ratio between 1.5 and 2.5 in the absence of contraindications, and an echocardiographic study was made to assess the presence of atrial thrombi. Both the neurologic and cardiologic studies were based on the same standardized protocol in all patients. This protocol included VRF assessment based on the clinical history, the medication used by the patient, and certain complementary studies such as ECG, carotid Doppler ultrasound, and blood tests. The presence of any laboratory test alteration indicative of VRF was subsequently confirmed by repeated testing under the same conditions.
Clinical Sleep Assessment
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome-related clinical manifestations prior to ischemic stroke were recorded as follows: A patient was considered to have significant snoring disorder if snoring occurred every or almost every night. Significant witnessed apneic episodes were those occurring every or almost every night, or repeatedly in the same night, and diurnal hypersomnia was assessed by the validated Spanish version of the Epworth sleepiness scale.21 Demographic and anthropometric variables (age, sex, BMI, and neck perimeter) were also recorded.
Polygraphic Studies
All patients finally included in the study underwent a respiratory polygraphic evaluation in the stable phase of stroke (2 months after the acute episode). CPAP treatment was offered to patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)
20. The empirical initial CPAP pressure was calculated for each patient using a published prediction formula based on anthropometric parameters and on the AHI.22 In no patient did we prescribe an initial pressure of > 8 cm H2O in an attempt to improve compliance. This pressure was maintained for 1 month of initial adaptation until automatic CPAP titration was carried out. During this time, contact was maintained with the patient to provide instructions on the treatment and to try to solve any possible problems and side effects (particularly leakage problems), ensuring an appropriate nonleaking mask, since this problem in very common in such patients.2324
Both diagnostic and autotitration polygraphic studies were carried out using a portable system (Autoset Portable Plus II; ResMed; Sydney, Australia) as described elsewhere.25262728 Low-leak 95th percentile pressure was used. In the event of a severe leak (> 0.4 L/s), the titration was considered nonvalid and the test was repeated. Only those tests in which the patient claimed to have slept at least 3 h, and where at least 4 h of recording were available, were considered valid. We have defined apnea and hypopnea previously.13 All data were calculated as a function of total recording time. All tests were performed in our hospital, in rooms conveniently prepared to the effect by trained personnel.
Follow-up
Following the diagnostic study and posterior CPAP titration, two groups were established and subjected to follow-up for 18 months: patients with an AHI
20 who could tolerate CPAP treatment (group 1), and patients with an AHI
20 who could not tolerate CPAP treatment (group 2). Patients with an AHI < 20 were excluded from the study. Follow-up of the groups started the day after CPAP titration. Adequate CPAP tolerance was considered when the system counter indicated that the patient was using the device for at least 4 h at night during at least 70% of the follow-up nights.29 Data were collected on the appearance of new VEs in the course of the study. All patients were instructed to report to our center in the event of any suspected new VEs during the follow-up period. A new VE was defined as the documented appearance of a new cerebrovascular or ischemic coronary event. The neurologic event was diagnosed by a neurologist based on the clinical picture, the imaging studies, or the consequences of the event. Coronary events (angina or acute myocardial infarction) in turn were evaluated by a cardiologist based on the clinical manifestations, the ECG changes, and laboratory test findings. At the end of follow-up, the number of hypertensive patients was recorded, along with the number of antihypertensive drugs used, hypertension control, the neurologic evolution parameters (Barthel index and Canadian scale), and any variation in the VRF, including BMI or new unregistered or unrecognized VEs (patients describing clinical manifestations compatible with a new VE during follow-up, but who failed to report to our center). All data relating to new VEs and their course, and to new VRFs during follow-up were obtained based on the same standardized protocol used in the baseline period.
Statistical Analysis
All data were tabulated as means ± SD for quantitative variables, and as absolute values (percentage) in the case of qualitative variables. Normality of the variables was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparison of values recorded at baseline (between groups) and at the end of the study (within groups) was based on the Student t test for unpaired or paired means respectively, or the
2 test in the case of dichotomic variables. The analysis of the role of CPAP treatment in the prevention of new VEs was based on the construction of Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each group studied. The curves were compared by the log-rank test adjusted for the presence of AF. Identification of the factors related to the appearance of a new VE was based on Cox proportional hazard model (forwards stepwise multivariate analysis). We initially included in the equation all the independent variables relating to the general characteristics of the patients, the polygraphic parameters, characteristics of stroke and its clinical repercussions, cardiovascular risk factors, and tolerance of CPAP treatment. Lastly, a calculation was made of the number needed to treated with CPAP in order to avoid a new VE.30 Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 were finally included. Mean age was 72.7 ± 9.4 years (range, 57 to 82 years; 63% men; BMI, 26.8 ± 4.4 kg/m2; neck circumference, 40.2 ± 6.3 cm). Of these, 39 patients (76.8%) had a chronic snoring disorder, and 10 patients (20%) presented with witnessed apneic episodes. The mean Epworth sleepiness scale score was 7.6 ± 4.2. The VRFs were distributed as follows: 68.6% AHT (43% with poor control); 39.2% diabetes mellitus; 19.6% internal carotid stenosis; 25.5% AF; 25.5% active smoking habit; 15.7% ischemic heart disease; 35.3% hypercholesterolemia; and mean fibrinogen concentration, 335 ± 78 mg/dL. Twelve of the neurologic events (23.5%) consisted of TIAs. The mean Barthel index was 76.9 ± 32.7, with a Canadian scale score of 8.17 ± 1.9. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between groups with respect to age, sex, VRF, or characteristics of stroke (Table 1
). The mean duration of Autoset Portable Plus II registry was 6.3 ± 3.1 h (range, 3.5 to 9 h). The mean AHI was 37.4 ± 7.9, with an obstructive apnea index of 31.5 ± 10.8, a central apnea index of 2.1 ± 2.1, and a counting time with an oxygen saturation of < 90% of 10.2 ± 4.4%.
|
Following the initial 1-month adaptation period (33 ± 7 days), automatic CPAP titration was carried out in those patients who tolerated CPAP treatment (n = 15; 29.4%). In this group, AHI decreased on the night of titration from 40.8 ± 14.2 to 3.8 ± 3.3. The mean pressure (95th percentile) was 8.2 ± 4.4 cm H2O (range, 6 to 13 cm H2O). The mean duration of CPAP use was 5.7 ± 2.1 h during the study.
CPAP Effectiveness
Figure 1
shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves corresponding to the groups studied. Fourteen new VEs were identified in the course of the study (11 ischemic strokes, 1 episode of angina, and 2 acute myocardial infarctions). The incidence of new VE in groups 1 and 2 was 6.7% and 36%, respectively (p = 0.03). Of these events, one stroke (6.7%) in group 1 and seven strokes (19.4%) in group 2 occurred in patients with AF.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 following stabilization of the neurologic process, without inducing changes in the neurologic recovery parameters, although tolerance of the treatment was low. Some studies have analyzed the course of patients with ischemic stroke in relation to the incidence of SAHS after stabilization of the ischemic event. Good et al31 reported poorer neurologic recovery and an increase in mortality after 1 year of follow-up in patients who presented with greater nocturnal oxygen desaturation, while Dyken et al7 found that 4 years after stroke, the patients who died (21%) presented with greater AHI. Very few studies have evaluated the role of CPAP treatment after stabilization of the neurologic event in the recovery of patients with high AHI values. After patients had 4 weeks of CPAP treatment, Sandberg et al24 found that patients with an AHI > 15 showed improvement in the depression parameters without cognitive or neurologic amelioration. Wessendorf et al32 reported a better well-being index and normalization of the "deeper" nocturnal BP pattern. The results of our study support these conclusions in part, since CPAP treatment was not shown to improve the neurologic course in our patients. In the present series, our patients improved their neurologic indexes in the course of the study, although the group that tolerated CPAP failed to reach statistical significance in this sense. This cannot be attributed to a negative effect of CPAP on the neurologic course of these individuals but rather to the fewer patients conforming the group that tolerated CPAP treatment, and to statistical regression to the meansince this patient group presented significantly less neurologic impairment at the start of follow-up than the other group. However, the long time elapsed between the acute neurologic event and the start of CPAP treatment (approximately 2 months in our study) may cause irreversible stroke-induced brain damage and thus adversely affect patient recovery. In this sense, some authors3334 postulate that CPAP treatment in the acute phase of stroke could contribute to recovery of the still viable ischemic zones, thereby improving the posterior neurologic course, although to our knowledge, no studies have yet explored this possibility.
We believe that the present study is the first to prospectively analyze the role of long-term CPAP treatment in protecting stroke patients from new VEs. Our main finding was that CPAP treatment during 18 months significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VEs adjusted for the presence of AF (ie, patients in whom the risk of a cardioembolic origin of stroke is greater), other VRFs, and neurologic indexes such as the Barthel index or the Canadian scale. Thus, intolerance of CPAP treatment was associated with a more than fivefold increase in the risk of new coronary or cerebrovascular events. Based on these results, we calculated that in order to avoid a VE, four patients would have to be treated with CPAP (95% CI, 2 to 26). It is known that during the first 5 years after stroke, vascular recurrence is the principal cause of death in these patients, and that half of those who survive suffer incapacitation and are dependent on others for their daily life activities. This implies a very important deterioration in quality of life, as well as great health-care costs.15 On further taking into account the high prevalence of both ischemic stroke and SAHS in the general population, and the important percentage of stroke patients with a high incidence of sleep-disordered breathing (> 50% in our series showed an AHI
20), it can be seen that the number of events that could be avoided with CPAP treatment would be important indeed, with all the positive consequences in terms of morbidity and mortality this implies. We consider that in our patients, the protective role of CPAP treatment against recurrent VEs is of a multifactor origin. Improved AHT control may play a preponderant role, since AHT is known to be the most important risk factor for stroke. In this sense, we observed a nonsignificant tendency toward improved AHT control, with a decrease after 18 months of CPAP treatment in the percentage of hypertensive patients, the number of antihypertensive drugs required, and the number of patients with poor hypertension control. However, neither were all patients with AHT controlled by CPAP (30% in our series), nor is it to be expected that all the effects of long-term CPAP therapy are attributable to improved AHT control. It is possible that after 18 months of treatment, some other known effects of CPAP become manifest, such as a decrease in the risk of arteriosclerosis35 or in platelet aggregation.36
The cutoff point selected for treating our patients with CPAP (AHI > 20) is based on the high incidence of SAHS observed in more elderly individuals such as those in our series (mean age, 72.7 years). In Spain, Duran et al37 published a prevalence of AHI > 20 of > 40% among the general population aged 71 to 100 years. Interestingly, in our series, the incidence of new VEs among the patients excluded from the study and in whom CPAP was not indicated (AHI < 20, n = 44) was significantly lower than the value calculated for the group with an AHI > 20 who did not tolerate CPAP (n = 36; 19.4% vs 36.8%, p = 0.04), other risk factors being equal. This implies a possible association between untreated SAHS and an increase in the posterior incidence of new VEs. However, within the group excluded from the study in which CPAP was not indicated, the patients with a new VE showed a nonsignificant tendency for more respiratory events (AHI, 13 vs 7; p = 0.12); we therefore consider that the choice of a lower cutoff point for prescribing CPAP may have even further improved the capacity of the latter to protect against new VEs.
The present study has a series of limitations that require comment. A first limitation refers to the system used for the sleep study. While it is true that the Autoset Portable Plus II system has important limitations in the identification of central events, no high incidence of such events is to be expected following stabilization of the acute neurologic event. The Autoset Portable Plus II system has been validated by different authors,252627 and the best results have been obtained using high cutoff values in the definition of SAHS, with high prevalence of SAHS in the study population. Both characteristics are found in our series of patients (> 50% of the patients presented with an AHI
20 after stabilization of the neurologic process).
Another limitation of our study refers to the previously mentioned low percentage of patients who tolerated and continued CPAP treatment (n = 15; 29%) during 18 months, thus causing the calculations to lose statistical power. Nevertheless, and taking into account the difficulties reported by all authors in treating these patients with CPAP due to the inherent nature of stroke, we consider that the number of patients obtained has been considerable. In this sense, Hui et al23 were only able to keep 4 of 34 ischemic stroke patients on long-term domiciliary CPAP. In turn, Sandberg et al24 and Wessendorf et al32 were able to achieve short-term (approximately 4 weeks) CPAP tolerances of 50% and 70%, respectively. The posterior domiciliary follow-up figures are not known, although they were likely to have been much lower. In agreement with other series,2431 the patients who were unable to adapt to CPAP had less hypersomnia, fewer respiratory events, and greater neurologic repercussions of stroke.
Lastly, mention should be made of the fact that we did not use CPAP placebo (sham CPAP), since this option is not available in our center. This obliged us to use as control group those patients who did not tolerate CPAP, adjusting the results for those variables found to be statistically different at the start of the study among the different treatment groups, particularly other VRF and neurologic recovery parameters.
It can be concluded that in our series of patients with ischemic stroke or TIA, the risk of a new VE was greater than expected in those individuals with SAHS not treated with CPAP after 18 months of follow-up. While CPAP compliance was low, the treatment could prove effective in avoiding recurrent VEs. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and explore a formula for improving adhesion to CPAP therapy among ischemic stroke patients.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 13, 2004. Accepted for publication April 26, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. V. Alexandrov, V. K. Sharma, A. Y. Lao, G. Tsivgoulis, M. D. Malkoff, and A. W. Alexandrov Reversed Robin Hood Syndrome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3045 - 3048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |