|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium.
Correspondence to: Anne-Marie Vints, MD, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat, 10, Edegem 2650, Belgium; e-mail: anne-marie.vints{at}uza.be
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study objectives: The objective of this investigation was to have a better understanding of the time-dependent effect of nitrate-rich meals on eNO in healthy subjects.
Study design: Forty-two healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (age range, 25 to 62 years) were recruited for the study. They had no recent respiratory tract infections and were free of pulmonary history, rhinitis, and atopic disorders. eNO was measured before, and 0.5, 2, 4, 12, 15, and 20 h after the intake of a nitrate-rich meal equivalent to 230 mg of nitrate.
Results: The intake of a nitrate-rich meal increased eNO by 60% 2 h after the meal. Even after 15 h, the mean eNO value was still 22% higher than the baseline value. Only after 20 h did eNO return to the normal baseline level.
Conclusion: This finding stresses the importance of advising patients to avoid nitrate-rich nutrition at least 20 h before a scheduled measurement of eNO.
Key Words: exhaled nitric oxide nitrate-rich meals time dependence
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The reason for this broad application of eNO is that eNO is easy to measure, it is highly reproducible in normal subjects,7 and it shows no diurnal variation.8 However, some external factors can influence eNO. If eNO is used to monitor inflammation, it is important to know the influence of these external factors. One of these disturbing factors is nitrate-rich food, already studied by Olin and coworkers,9 who measured eNO in healthy subjects up to 3 h after the intake of a nitrate-rich meal and showed a median increase in eNO of 43% while eNO levels were not yet returned to baseline 3 h after the meal.9 A complete view of the long-lasting time effect of nitrate-rich meals is not known, so diet restrictions are not yet included in the guidelines for eNO measurements. The aim of this work was to examine in closer detail the influence, as function of time, of a nitrate-rich meal on the level of eNO in healthy adults. Our results imply that guidelines for eNO measurements should indeed include restrictions on the intake of nitrate-rich meals at least 20 h prior to the measurement.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
eNO levels of the test persons were measured before, and 0.5, 2, 4, 12, 15, and 20 h after the intake of a nitrate-rich meal. The "standard" nitrate-rich meal given to the subjects consisted of 100 g of lettuce and 50 g of radishes equivalent to approximately 230 mg of nitrate. All volunteers were instructed to avoid nitrate-rich nutrients 12 h prior to the baseline eNO measurement, performed in the morning. At approximately noon, 28 volunteers consumed our standard nitrate-rich meal and their eNO levels were measured 0.5, 2, 4, and 20 h after that meal. Twenty subjects had the standard nitrate-rich meal at approximately 8:00 PM, and their eNO values were recorded 12 h and 15 h later the next day. Under this schedule, eNO measurements during the night could be avoided. For practical reasons related to the daily professional activities of the volunteers, it was not possible to record eNO values at all the defined time lags for every subject.
The sampled eNO values of all the volunteers were subclassified in seven subsets. The first subset, hereafter named as the reference set, contained the eNO values of all the 42 volunteers before they had eaten the nitrate-rich meal. The next six subsets contained eNO data of a variable number of subjects recorded at 0.5 h (n = 26), 2 h (n = 23), 4 h (n = 28), 12 h (n = 20), 15 h (n = 17), and 20 h (n = 18) after the consumption of the nitrate-rich meal.
Methods
The eNO concentration was measured on-line (Niox Nitric Oxide Analyser; Aerocrine; Stockholm, Sweden) according to American Thoracic Society recommendations.10 The subjects were measured seated. After full exhalation, the subjects inhaled nitric oxide (NO)-free air from the apparatus to total lung capacity and then immediately exhaled slowly at a constant flow rate of 50 mL/s. The exhalation breathing maneuver lasted for 10 s, and the measurement was accepted when there was a NO plateau during the last 3 s of the measurement. The exhalation was performed against a fixed external resistance that ensured a positive mouth pressure of 5 to 20 cm H2O so that the soft palate was closed to prevent contamination with nasal NO. A visual biofeedback helped the subjects to achieve the desired expiratory flow of 50 mL/s (± 10%). The maneuver was repeated with 30 s of relaxed breathing between the measurements until three reproducible NO values were obtained.10 The mean NO value of these three maneuvers was used for further analysis.
Statistical Analysis
The eNO values of the volunteers were log-normally distributed as already published by other authors,11 so the analysis of the eNO data was carried out on log10-transformed data. The distribution of the log10 (eNO) values in the seven subsets were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test as shown in Figure 1
. The log10-transformed eNO data of all the subsets were normally distributed except the data set recorded after 15 h. However, an unpaired, two-tailed t test can tolerate a modest skewness in the population distribution.12 The averages of the log10 (eNO) values of each of the seven subsets were compared with the average of the reference log10 (eNO) values by an unpaired, two tailed, t test at a 95% confidence level or a p level
0.05.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
eNO was for the first time described in the air of healthy subjects in 1991 by Gustafsson et al.14 Two years later, in 1993, Alving et al15 described that NO was increased in the air exhaled by patients with asthma. Now, 14 years later, eNO is generally used as a marker of several inflammatory airway disorders, in particular asthma.
Many studies have shown the importance of eNO in the follow-up of asthma patients and confirm that the results of eNO measurements are closely related to indirect indexes of asthma control such as symptom scores within the past 2 weeks, dyspnea score, and daily use of rescue medication.16 Although these indexes reflect the clinical control of asthma in the patients, they are all indirect indexes of airway inflammation. Direct indexes of airway inflammation are also related with eNO. eNO correlates with the quantity of eosinophils in bronchial biopsies in patients with atopic asthma17 and with an increased number of eosinophils in the induced sputum of asthma patients.18
In the follow-up of asthma patients, eNO reflects the evolution of the airway inflammation when starting, reducing, or stopping a treatment. When a treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids is started, eNO is reduced.19 However, when inhaled glucocorticoids were withdrawn in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, eNO measurements were highly predictive (80 to 90%) for loss of their asthma control.20 The increase of eNO during an asthma exacerbation due to reduction in steroids may be detected even before a decrease in the pulmonary function tests occurs.21 Studies have also shown that the measurement of eNO in patients with undiagnosed chronic respiratory symptoms can be predictive for a diagnosis of asthma22 and that eNO correlates with asthma severity. eNO was significantly higher in patients with severe asthma compared with patients with mild asthma.23 A limitation in the use of eNO as inflammation marker in asthma is that it is a good marker in steroid-naïve asthma patients but probably not so useful in asthma patients who are already treated with inhaled steroids.24
Beside asthma, eNO has also diagnostic value in the follow-up of patients after lung transplantation. In a number of other lung diseases, eNO is researched as a parameter of inflammation. eNO is a noninvasive and easy-to-perform test that can be regularly repeated. Earlier investigation has also proved that there is no evidence for a diurnal variation of eNO and that eNO is reproducible in normal subjects.825
Apart of all these advantages, there are also confounding factors in the use of eNO as a parameter of inflammation in lung diseases. The confounding factors in the interpretation of eNO can be classified in two groups. The first group consists of other inflammatory diseases of the upper or lower airways, which can increase eNO like allergic rhinitis,26 viral airway infections,27 and pneumonia.28 The second group of confounding factors consists of external factors affecting the level of eNO. Factors that reduce the level of eNO are the consumption of caffeine in healthy persons29 (however, a recent study30 showed no effect on eNO in patients with asthma), smoking,31 a sputum induction procedure,32 and consumption of alcohol by asthma patients.33 An external factor that increases the level of eNO is the consumption of a nitrate-rich meal.9 The influence of this particular disturbing factor on the interpretation of eNO measurements was the main subject of this study. Vegetables are important sources of nitrate in our daily Western diet and are regularly used by our patients. Some examples of nitrate-rich food are lettuce, radishes, spinach, parsley, green cabbage, and rhubarb. The concentration of nitrate in different sorts of vegetables (eg, in lettuce and in spinach) fluctuates significantly. The differences are mostly related to the season and weather conditions in which the vegetables are grown but also the fact whether the vegetables are protected or outdoor grown influences their nitrate concentration.34 Our study examined in closer detail the longer time scale over which a nitrate rich-meal influences the level of eNO in healthy adults. It is known that 2 h after a nitrate-rich meal, the increase of eNO is maximal and that the effect still persists 3 h after the meal.9 The remaining practical question of how long this influence persists was not yet answered. By knowing the exact period over which nitrate-rich meals influence eNO, better advice can be given on restricting the intake of nitrate-rich food prior to eNO measurements.
The statistical analysis of the eNO measurements confirms that the intake of a nitrate-rich meal, equivalent with 230-mg nitrate, definitely increases eNO values. The NO increase is maximal, > 60%, 2 h after the meal. This finding is in agreement with Olin et al,9 who also reported a maximal increase of eNO 2 h after ingestion of nitrate-rich nutrients, although via a different measurement technique. The effect lasts for at least 15 h.
In conclusion, besides confirming the short-term effect of nitrate-rich food on eNO, the longer time effect is now mapped out clearly. Nitrate-rich meals induce a maximal increase of eNO after 2 h, but after 15 h the increase is still significant. Only after 20 h is the eNO value definitely back to normal. This finding has consequences for routine clinical practice and for the design and interpretation of clinical studies in which eNO is used as an inflammation parameter. It stresses the importance of informing patients to refrain from nitrate-rich meals at least 20 h prior to a scheduled measurement of eNO.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication October 26, 2004. Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Lim and C. Mottram The Use of Fraction of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Pulmonary Practice Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1232 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |