Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Menyar, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Menyar, A. A.
(Chest. 2005;128:2835-2846.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

The Resuscitation Outcome*

Revisit the Story of the Stony Heart

Ayman A. El-Menyar, MD, MRCP

* From the Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, State of Qatar.

Correspondence to: Ayman Ahmed El-Menyar, MD, Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation and Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, State of Qatar; e-mail: aymanco65{at}yahoo.com


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Postresuscitation syndrome is a state of myocardial dysfunction after the restoration of circulation by successful resuscitation. Despite several advances in the field of resuscitation, the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is still suboptimal. The high fatality rate shortly after successful resuscitation is mainly related to postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Postresuscitation myocardial stunning is reversible, while stony heart is irreversible due to prolonged unsuccessful resuscitation. This article reviews most of the published articles concerning the causes, mechanism, pathophysiology, and the updated trials for management of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Further studies are warranted to highlight postresuscitation disease and its hemodynamic sequences and then to intervene according to the different phases of cardiac arrest. By modifying the conventional modalities of resuscitation together with new promising agents, the rescuers will be able to salvage the jeopardized postresuscitation myocardium and prevent its progression to the dismal stony heart. Community awareness and staff education are crucial to shorten resuscitation time and improve short-term and long-term outcomes. There is an urgent need to revise the guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in community setting, but how? It is a matter of where and when it is of enough value to be efficacious and cost-effective.

Key Words: myocardial stunning • postresuscitation disease • postresuscitation syndrome • stony heart • successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The postresuscitation period is well recognized as the main predictor of resuscitation outcome. Early defibrillation is the most important and effective variable in this period. Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not a momentary event, and the long-term outcome should be the aim. Twenty to 40% of patients who had cardiac arrest are initially resuscitated, but only 10% survive to hospital discharge. There is marked but reversible form of systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunction together with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that compromise postresuscitation survival, with a high fatality rate in the early hours and days after successful resuscitation. This fatal outcome of victims after initially successful resuscitation for cardiac arrest has been attributed to global myocardial ischemia during the cardiac arrest and the adverse effects of reperfusion. Successful CPR is complicated with a stunned myocardium, while failed or prolonged CPR is complicated with a stony myocardium, which is the worst form of myocardial dysfunction. Awareness of the pathophysiology before, during, and early after restoration of the circulation is of crucial importance to improve the outcomes of CPR.1234 Successful treatment of post-CPR myocardial failure could save approximately 25,000 patients per year.


    Outcome of Resuscitation
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Incidence rates of sudden cardiac death (SCD) ranging from 0.36 to 1.28 per 1,000 inhabitants per year have been reported.56 Twenty-one percent of all deaths were sudden and unexpected in men, and 14.5% were sudden and unexpected in women. Eighty percent of out-of-hospital cases may occur at home, and approximately 15% occur on the street or in a public place, while 40% of SCDs are unwitnessed. Before the introduction of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), only 15% of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims had restoration of spontaneous circulation and reached the hospital alive. Of those, only 50% survived to hospital discharge. Considering only patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation (VF), survival to discharge is approximately double.7 CPR itself yields a functional survival rate of only 1.4 to 5%.

In the Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I and II,89 a total of 778 patients were successfully resuscitated; 70% of them died within the first 72 h, while 65% died within 1 week. A sign of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction before death in the form of recurrent cardiac arrest, marked hypotension, or shock has been noted in > 50% of victims.568910 In other multicenter clinical studies,8911 60% of 407 resuscitated patients died within 72 h. Hypotension and ventricular arrhythmias were identified as predominant causes of death, and only 4.5% of patients were ultimately discharged alive from the hospital. Two clinical studies1213 have reported serial measurements of indexes of cardiac function after resuscitation and indicated that the initial lower ejection fraction after CPR is a predictor for lower cardiac index, which in turn presages the development of multiorgan failure and mortality in the next 24 h.


    Factors Affecting the Outcome of Resuscitation
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The results of CPR are influenced not only by the resuscitation efforts but also by the conditions before initiation of CPR. The causes of death after resuscitation include CNS damage in one third of cases, refractory myocardial damage in another third, and sepsis and other complications in the last third. In two meta-analysis studies141516 of 4,937 cases of cardiopulmonary arrest, the poor outcome following in-hospital arrest was related to multiple variables: prearrest variables (ie, hypotension, renal failure, pneumonia, and cancer); intra-arrest variables (ie, duration of arrest [> 15 min]); unwitnessed arrests; initial rhythm other than ventricular tachyarrhythmia; multiple ECG events; increasing doses of epinephrine; resuscitations between 12 midnight and 6:00 AM; and postarrest variables, such as decreased level of consciousness over 24 h, new-onset azotemia, recurrent cardiopulmonary arrest, and persistent hypotension.

Specific therapeutic interventions applied in each phase of cardiac arrest are critical for a successful outcome Three phases have been identified during cardiac arrest. The first is the electrical phase, which lasts approximately 5 min, during which defibrillation is the priority. The use of AEDs within 3 min following the onset of VF resulted in the highest ever reported survival of 70%. Survival from VF cardiac arrest declines approximately 7 to 10% for each minute without defibrillation.17 The second phase is hemodynamic phase, which lasts from 4 to 10 min. During this time, circulatory support using chest compression is the priority. During the hemodynamic phase, the left ventricle (LV) becomes empty as blood is shifted to the right side. The third phase is the metabolic phase, when drugs and hypothermia can be used. In the latter two phases of cardiac arrest, perfusion is critical in maintaining coronary perfusion pressure and is vital to survival. The use of an AED can be harmful in the last two phases.1819 Electrical shock in patients with prolonged VF result in defibrillation not to a perfusing rhythm but to pulseless electrical activity (PEA).20 Thus, the methodology of CPR and its application according to the appropriate phase of cardiac arrest play pivotal role in the fate of the postresuscitation myocardial function.

Impact of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Ischemia-reperfusion injury is thought to be due to the generation of oxygen-derived free radicals such as superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. Such free radicals lead to lipid peroxidation, cellular dysfunction, and stunning of the myocardium. Numerous studies have implicated the nitric oxide-peroxynitrite pathway in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Reperfusion and reoxygenating could play an important precipitating role in postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.2122232425

Postresuscitation Disease
Postresuscitation disease is a specific pathophysiologic state of vital organ systems early after ischemic anoxia. Adrie et al2627 hypothesized that postresuscitation disease may be related to an early systemic inflammatory response, leading to an exacerbation of the inflammatory balance, and may possibly be associated with an "endotoxin tolerance." Postresuscitation disease is similar to that seen in severe sepsis, as it characterizes by high levels of circulating cytokines and adhesion molecules, the presence of plasma endotoxin, and dysregulated leukocyte production of cytokines. Coagulation abnormalities occur consistently after successful resuscitation, and their severity is associated with mortality. For example, plasma protein C and S activities after successful resuscitation are lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors. Low baseline cortisol levels may be associated with an increased risk of fatal early refractory shock after cardiac arrest, suggesting adrenal dysfunction in these patients. The stress-induced proinflammatory cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and interleukin-1ß, are known to depress myocardial function. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and interleukin-1ß, synthesized and released in response to the stress of global ischemia accompanying cardiac arrest, play a role in development of postresuscitation LV dysfunction as well.262728 Detection of high levels of endogenous vasopressin and catecholamines during resuscitation has therapeutic and prognostic implications.2930

Postresuscitation Syndrome
Postresuscitation syndrome is a state of myocardial dysfunction after the restoration of circulation by successful resuscitation. It manifests by increased cardiac filling pressures, decreased cardiac index, and a decrease in both systolic and diastolic function. Severe but temporary LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction may follow 10 to 15 min of untreated cardiac arrest and successful resuscitation. The dramatically global nature of this systolic dysfunction after resuscitation has been demonstrated with echocardiography, as well as ventriculography, and revealed decrease in ejection fraction, a decrease in fractional shortening, a decrease in the rate of rise of LV pressure, a decrease in peak systolic LV pressure/end-systolic volume ratio, and a rightward shift in the pressure/volume relationship411

Stunned Myocardium
Stunned myocardium is prolonged postischemic myocardial dysfunction with eventual return of normal contractile activity.31 Stunning is now thought to occur in several clinical situations, including delayed recovery from effort angina, unstable angina, early thrombolytic reperfusion, ischemic cardioplegia, cardiac transplantation, coronary angioplasty, and cardiac arrest. The concept of ischemic contracture of the myocardium is associated with myocardial stunning. The same concept may be applicable to the global myocardial ischemia of cardiac arrest. Augmented crossbridging between actin and myosin followed depletion of high-energy phosphates explains the severity of myocardial stiffness.

During ischemia, there is a reduction in both creatine phosphate and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). With reperfusion, there is immediate restoration of the normal creatine phosphate level, while ATP takes several days to return to normal; this depletion of the total adenine nucleotide pool leads to prolonged depression of myocardial contractility. The other possible mechanisms of myocardial stunning include alteration in sarcoplasmic calcium ATP and calcium metabolism, up-regulation of the heat shock protein, and generation of oxygen-free radicals. A major hypothesis with significant experimental support is that enhanced oxidative stress is a critical component in the pathophysiology of stunning.32 Myocardial stunning after respiratory arrest has been followed by full recovery occurred within few days after successful resuscitation. Hence, LV pressures, cardiac index, and hemodynamically measured isovolumic relaxation time all confirmed LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction.233

According to Kern et al,234 myocardial stunning includes the persistence of LV dysfunction after the return of normal myocardial blood flow, and myocardial blood flow might be unchanged between baseline levels and that found at 5 h after resuscitation, even though LV ejection fraction remained markedly decreased by 5 h. These data convincingly show that this phenomenon of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction is an example of acute but reversible heart failure, and thus aggressive support is indicated during the first 48 to 72 h.

Stony Heart
Ischemic contracture refers to the progressive myocardial wall thickening with reductions in ventricular cavity that results from severe ischemia. Its onset is associated with decreases in ATP to levels < 10% of normal. Ischemic contracture of varying severity has been reported during cardiac arrest to compromise resuscitability in animal models and in human victims of cardiac arrest. Ischemic contracture occurred with essentially no changes in end-of-chest-relaxation LV pressures, confirming reductions in myocardial compliance. Stony heart is a severe form of ischemic contracture in which a progressive impairment in diastolic function during CPR precedes evolution of the "stone heart" after failure of or prolonged CPR.353637

Klouche et al37 described the term stone heart in animals. They induced VF in 40 pigs; after 4 min, 7 min, or 10 min of untreated VF, electrical defibrillation was attempted. Failing to reverse VF in each instance, precordial compression at a rate of 80/min was begun coincident with mechanical ventilation. The result showed that significantly greater coronary perfusion pressures were generated with the 4 min of untreated cardiac arrest, while progressive reductions in LV diastolic and stroke volume and increases in LV free-wall thickness were documented with increasing duration of untreated VF. A stone heart was confirmed at autopsy and correlated with the echocardiographic in each animal with failed resuscitative efforts. Myocardial stiffness, in turn, accounted for decreased effectiveness of chest compression for producing forward blood flow during CPR and perpetuating a vicious circle.37


    Role of the Initial Rhythm
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The most common initial arrhythmias encountered in cases of out-of-hospital SCDs are VF or ventricular tachycardia. However, nonventricular rhythms including PEA and asystole are reported with increasing frequency as the first ECG findings in out-of-hospital SCDs. This rhythm group now appears to represent the majority of patients in whom out-of-hospital resuscitation is attempted. In most reports, the rate of survival when PEA or asystole is the initial documented cardiac arrest rhythm is poor and approximates 2%.1039404142 It is likely that VF is the cause of 60 to 80% of cardiac arrests, while asystole results in 20 to 40%.4344 PEA may be found in up to 10% of patients with cardiac arrest. A number of theories have been proposed to explain the apparent refractoriness of asystole to resuscitation attempts, including impairment of the automaticity of the sinus node, malfunction of related conduction pathways secondary to ischemia, failure of neurogenic innervation of the heart, and failure of reflex sympathetic performance. It is clear that progressive ischemia and acidosis are always present.45 Countershock of prolonged VF is followed by secondary PEA or asystole in approximately 60% of patients. Only 0 to 2% of postshock PEA and asystole patients survive to be discharged from the hospital.4647 Patients found in primary PEA or asystole at the time of resuscitative efforts have initially a significantly higher rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital admission than for patients found in VF with PEA or asystole after countershock. In rare instances, low-amplitude VF can "masquerade" as asystole; laboratory and clinical studies48495051 indicate that low-amplitude VF rarely responds favorably to countershock.

Impact of Fibrillation
During VF, the normal balance of myocardial energy supply and demand is disrupted because the demand of the myocardium for energy exceeds what is available from a reserve of high-energy phosphates and from anaerobic glycolysis. Consequently, the net supply of ATP available to the myocyte decreases to critical level. Decrease in myocardial tissue ATP during ischemia is correlated with the severity of myocardial injury, and therefore it is a predictive of myocytes survival when coronary perfusion is restored.525354

Patients with VF suffer a complex set of insults that may include defibrillation, ischemia, and even tissue infarction. It is worth remembering that the classic concept of myocardial stunning is a consequence of ischemia, not defibrillation. However the final lesion in stunning is a reduction in the myofilament contractile response to increases in intracellular calcium; a similar lesion underlies mechanical dysfunction after successful defibrillation (independent of the means of defibrillation) has been reported.55

Effect of Defibrillation
Electrical shocks that defibrillate hearts successfully also produce myocardial injury, and this injury increases with the higher energy shocks. The harmful effect has been shown if defibrillation administered in the second and third phases during cardiac arrest. The electrochemical activity of the arrhythmia itself may, in the absence of ischemia, contribute to excitation-contraction uncoupling via intracellular calcium overload. Electrical countershocks may potentiate this effect and have furthermore been linked to the dose-dependent release of free radicals and to waveform-specific effects on mitochondrial function and oxidative metabolism, which might aggravate the postresuscitation stunning.565758

High-energy defibrillator produces more severe LV dysfunction, while fixed low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation significantly reduces the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction compared with an escalating monophasic energy defibrillator. Defibrillators with 4 J/kg produce significantly less postresuscitation dysfunction than either 20 J/kg or 40 J/kg, and the maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform. It has been shown that diastolic function is more impaired than systolic function for both waveform types, with more prominent filling impairments after monophasic countershocks persisting for up to 15 min, while the systolic function was much better with biphasic shocks.585960 By lowering the defibrillation threshold, biphasic waveform defibrillation will improve survival after prolonged VF arrest.596061

Chest Compression and Myocardial Perfusion
The weakest links in the chain of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to VF are the lack of bystander-initiated basic CPR and the delay in defibrillation. Since the coronary and cerebral vessels are maximally dilated during cardiac arrest, the main factor in myocardial perfusion during basic CPR is the coronary perfusion pressure, which depends on the diastolic pressure that created during the release phase of chest compression. The cerebral perfusion pressure is related to the systolic pressure created during the chest compression phase of CPR. The perfusion pressure falls every time chest compressions are interrupted for assisted ventilation, and it takes time to build up again once chest compressions are reinitiated.62 Accordingly, with a ratio of 15 compressions to two breaths, the highest perfusion pressures are present for less than half the time. Starting with chest compressions in the hemodynamic phase can attain a survival of 20% compared to 4% if during this phase electrical shock is administered first and followed by chest compressions.63 Hallstrom et al64 confirmed that in cases of witnessed sudden cardiac arrest with a nonrespiratory cause, CPR by chest compression alone is as good as, and possibly better, than standard CPR by compression plus ventilation. Wik et al65 agreed that CPR first prior to defibrillation offered no advantage in improving outcomes for some cases or patients with ambulance response times < 5 min. However, the patients with VF and ambulance response intervals > 5 min had better outcomes with CPR first before defibrillation was attempted.65 Interruptions of precordial compression for rhythm analyses that exceed 15 s before each shock compromise the outcome of CPR and increase the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.66


    Adrenergic Vasopressor During CPR
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Adrenergic vasopressor agents are employed to increase peripheral vascular resistance to increase aortic diastolic pressure and, consequently, coronary perfusion pressure and myocardial blood flow. Epinephrine initially doubles coronary blood flow.66 However, intense vasoconstrictor itself improves coronary perfusion pressure but at the expense of the outcome; the postresuscitation stunned LV may be unable to tolerate the substantially increased systemic vascular resistance.68 The ß- and, to a lesser extent, the {alpha}1-adrenergic inotropic and chronotropic actions increase oxygen consumption of the fibrillating ventricles.

Experimentally, epinephrine-treated animals require a large number of direct-current shocks, which will increase the severity of myocardial ischemia. The ß-adrenergic action of epinephrine in myocardial resuscitation has undesirable effects, as it increases the likelihood of reentrant and ectopic ventricular dysrhythmias, shortens the ventricular relaxation time, induces pulmonary ventilation/perfusion defects during CPR, increases myocardial lactate content, decreases myocardial ATP content, and is independently associated with unfavorable neurologic function after CPR.676970 The results of four clinical studies71727374 in which high vs conventional doses were compared showed that the general rate of recovery of spontaneous circulation was increased as greater doses were used (0.07 to 0.20 mg/kg), but there was no significant statistical difference in terms of increasing the rate of survival or hospital discharge. Berg et al74 disagreed and reported that high-dose epinephrine even with a ß-blocker during CPR resulted in worse outcome than standard-dose epinephrine with or without a ß-blocker.


    Buffer Therapy
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The combination of buffer therapy with standard adrenergic vasoconstrictors during CPR results in greater impairment of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and decrease in survival (Table 1 ). Bleske et al76 investigated the effect of sodium bicarbonate vs normal saline solution on the vasopressor effect of epinephrine after 10 min of untreated VF; they observed no significant differences in aortic systolic, diastolic, and coronary perfusion pressure or in the success of resuscitation between animals treated with sodium bicarbonate or saline solution, and even no hemodynamic benefit followed increases in the dose of sodium bicarbonate. Increases in blood pH are more likely to further increase myocardial oxygen requirements of the fibrillated heart and increase the severity of global ischemic myocardial injury. Patients with acidemia had a significantly greater pressor response to epinephrine than patients with alkalemia.7778 However, Sun et al79 proved that the buffer agents in combination with adrenergic vasopressor failed to increase the pressor response to epinephrine; to the contrary, it compromised postresuscitation myocardial function and survival by increasing the myocardial oxygen requirements and intensifying myocardial ischemia.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Variables Affect the Outcomes of Resuscitation Efforts*

 
Duration of Cardiac Arrest
The most significant factor for developing post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction is a prolonged resuscitation effort. The LV ejection fraction and pulmonary artery wedge pressure were significantly worse after resuscitation after 15 min of VF compared with only 10 min of VF. Progressive impairment in diastolic function will end with a stone heart after prolonged intervals of cardiac arrest. The University of Arizona Resuscitation Research Group has been investigating postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction with invasive and noninvasive measurements of LV before and after 10 min and 15 min of untreated cardiac arrest. After 10 min of untreated VF, maximal dysfunction was seen at 6 h with partial resolution by 24 h and full recovery by 48 h, indicating that postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction is a true stunning phenomenon. After 15 min of VF, no data could be obtained at 24 h because all such subjects died overnight. Such data suggest that transient LV failure after resuscitation can be life threatening, and resuscitation should not be delayed or prolonged to avoid the stony irreversible stage.23780

Brain Death and Postresuscitation Outcomes
Brain death leads to a series of pathophysiologic changes with deleterious consequences on cardiac function. There is massive but transient release of circulating catecholamines associated with a sustained increase in myocardial norepinephrine and neuropeptide Y directly released from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings. This will result in a striking increase in myocardial oxygen demand as estimated by the increase in the rate-pressure product.8182

The autonomic storm that might switch myocardial metabolism from an aerobic to anaerobic pattern is due to the coronary vasoconstrictor effect of norepinephrine and neuropeptide Y. Increased oxygen demand in parallel with impaired coronary reserve results in functional myocardial ischemia that contribute to the myocardial dysfunction observed after brain death. There is an association between brain death and an increase in myocardial interstitial adenosine and lactate concentrations, as well as with myocardial dysfunction; all were attenuated by concomitant ß-blocker, suggesting an imbalance between oxygen consumption and oxygen delivery as a possible cause of myocardial dysfunction after brain death.8183 Temporary delay in the circulation during cardiac arrest will cause brain death, which in its turn will compromise the myocardium during its way toward recovery.


    Prevention of Postresuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Urgency to revise the CPR guidelines is needed but should be cautiously commenced, as the outcome has not yet dramatically changed despite advances in CPR techniques. Understanding the concept of postresuscitation disease will minimize the proinflammatory cascade and improves its hemodynamic status. This will highlight the mechanism of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and address the importance of new management modalities for its prevention and treatment. All efforts should aim to shorten the time of CPR and to be coincident with the relevant phase of the cardiac arrest.

Inotropes and Vasopressors
The minimum coronary perfusion pressure and myocardial blood flow needed to achieve successful defibrillation are 15 mm Hg and 15 to 20 mL/min per 100 g, respectively. Standard CPR techniques cannot meet these minimum requirements in the absence of pressor agents.84

Dobutamine is the only drug that has been systematically evaluated in animal models of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Optimally, dobutamine should be administered within 15 min of successful resuscitation and at rate of 5 µg/kg/min. This will successfully treat postresuscitation LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction without adversely affecting myocardial oxygen consumption. Dobutamine improves diastolic relaxation of the LV through the same mechanism by which it improves systolic function, mainly by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in the cardiac myocytes. Dobutamine is superior to the intra-aortic balloon pump for treatment of postresuscitation LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, especially if there is no antecedent coronary artery disease.8586

Epinephrine Alternatives
Epinephrine still is the mainstay in advanced cardiac life support. However, it has been shown to significantly worsen postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction, chiefly from its ß-adrenergic effect during CPR. Efforts are going on to alleviate this harm either by adding ß-blockers or by replacing them with more selective agents or by different vasopressors

Selective {alpha}2-Adrenergic Agonists:
Sun et al87 reported that {alpha}-methylnorepinephrine was as effective as epinephrine for initial cardiac resuscitation but provided strikingly better postresuscitation myocardial function and survival.

Short-Acting ß-Blockers:
To counteract the harmful myocardial injury and increased metabolic demand due to epinephrine, two studies6788 suggested that the administration of a short-acting [ß]1-adrenergic blocking agent after prolonged VF improves the success of initial resuscitation, minimizes post-resuscitation myocardial contractile impairment, and prolongs postresuscitation survival. Myocardial interstitial catecholamine levels are greatly elevated immediately after long-duration VF, defibrillation, and reperfusion. This high level of endogenous catecholamines is cardiotoxic. Therefore, the short-acting ß-antagonist esmolol administered at reperfusion would protect against this catecholamine surge and improve survival after prolonged VF.30

Vasopressin:
Endogenous vasopressin levels were found to be higher in survivors of cardiac arrest than in patients who died, suggesting that vasopressin could be beneficial in cardiac arrest.29 Experimentally, vasopressin leads to significantly higher coronary perfusion pressures and maintained better oxygen delivery to the brain than did epinephrine. The recovery rate was significantly higher in animals treated with vasopressin than in those treated with epinephrine. Vasopressin has better activity in the acidemic environment; therefore, after prolonged arrest, the pressor effect of catecholamines is lowered and with vasopressin it is maintained.89 Wenzel et al9091 compared vasopressin and epinephrine in out-of-hospital CPR and recommended the administration of 1 mg of epinephrine, followed alternately by 40 IU of vasopressin and 1 mg of epinephrine every 3 min in adult cardiac arrest victims regardless of the initial ECG rhythm to improve the outcome of CPR. Vasopressin followed by epinephrine may be more effective than epinephrine alone in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrest or asystole. On the contrary, a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials showed no clear advantage of vasopressin over epinephrine in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Deterioration of postresuscitation ventricular function early after resuscitation may be noticed after vasopressin but did not compromise 24-h outcome. Including vasopressin in the new guideline of CPR is still a debatable issue.909192

Selective Phosphodiesterase III Inhibitors:
Selective phosphodiesterase III inhibitors (PDE IIIis) elevate intracellular cAMP in cardiac cells and increase contractility. The increase in contractility has been ascribed to enhanced sarcolemmal entry of calcium into the cell, increased release and uptake of calcium by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, modulation of calcium-troponin interactions, and decrease of coronary and peripheral vascular resistance. The unique properties of PDE IIIis are not catecholamine dependent and suggest that such agents might be beneficial in the management of postresuscitation ventricular dysfunction. Milrinone, a selective PDE IIIi administered in a standard mid-range dose, can lessen the degree of LV dysfunction occurring within 60 min after resuscitation. It also appears to decrease the incidence of refractory postshock PEA.9394

Induction of Preconditioning
The term ischemic preconditioning means that myocytes adapt to repetitive ischemic insults and are therefore protected against severe ischemic insults and cell death. Preconditioning essentially eliminates postresuscitation ventricular dysrhythmias. It is more likely that preconditioning improves myocardial mechanical function and mitigates postischemic arrhythmias by mechanisms other than infarction reduction.

ATP-Dependent Potassium Channel Openers:
ATP-dependent potassium (KATP) channel openers are a structurally diverse class of agents that, among other activities, protect ischemic myocardial tissue. The pharmacologic opening of the KATP channel during cardiac resuscitation mimics the myocardial protective effects of ischemic preconditioning, and this may provide a new option for myocardial preservation during the global myocardial ischemia of cardiac arrest. Preconditioning either electrically by episodes of short duration VF or pharmacologically by KATP openers significantly reduces postresuscitation dysfunction and increases survival by reduction of voltage requirement for successful defibrillation, the incidence of postresuscitation ventricular ectopic beats, the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction, and postresuscitation fatal outcomes. Norepinephrine also may confer delayed preconditioning against myocardial stunning via an {alpha}1-adrenoceptor–mediated pathway, but this norepinephrine-mediated preconditioning involves a beneficial effect toward stunning at the expense of a higher rate of ventricular arrhythmia.959697

Induction of Hibernation
Given that hibernation is a state of energy conservation and is reproducible with the administration of {delta}-opiates, potential implications for organ preservation arise. In fact, using hibernation triggers to extend organ viability has been done successfully in many models including myocardial protection.98 Sun et al99 hypothesized that a {delta}-opioid receptor agonist (pentazocine) would decrease the severity of post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and improve survival. In this study,99 all animals were administered pentazocine 5 min after untreated VF and 3 min before CPR. Left ventricular rate of pressure increase at 40 mmHg and cardiac index were significantly improved with easy defibrillation, and significantly longer survival was noted. The concept of pharmacologic hibernation employing a {delta}-opioid receptor agonist is a novel and promising intervention for minimizing global ischemic injury during CPR and postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.9899

Free Radical Inhibitors
Free radicals release plays a considerable role in the process of postresuscitation myocardial impairment. Administration of 21-aminosteroids (lazaroids) during CPR has contributed to the improvement of postresuscitation function and better neurologically normal survival. Lazaroids exert their antilipid preoxidation action via free radical scavenging and potent cell membrane stabilization.100 Zhang et al25 demonstrated that by inhibiting nitric oxide production with nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor during a myocardial ischemia-reperfusion sequence, coronary sinus free radical concentration was significantly diminished and accumulation of the peroxynitration product was abolished. Various competitive inhibitors of the NOS enzyme have been shown to reduce reperfusion injury in various settings; thus, NOS inhibitors deserve further evaluation cardioprotective agents against reperfusion injury.2122232425

Prevention of Intracellular Calcium Overload
The postfibrillatory dysfunction has been proposed to be a consequence of myocyte calcium overload that progressively occurs during VF even in the absence of ischemia. Transient myocyte calcium overload will lead to reduced calcium responsiveness of the myofilaments. Accordingly, calcium overload occurring during VF may lead to reduced calcium responsiveness of the myofilaments and thus cause postfibrillatory myocardial dysfunction. Early additional therapy targeting intracellular calcium overload may normalize myocyte Ca2+ and partially prevent postresuscitation stunning.56

Pharmacologic Defibrillation
The role of sodium-hydrogen exchanger in VF is a promising horizon. Ayoub et al100 identified activation of the sarcolemmal sodium-hydrogen exchanger isoform-1 (NHE-1) as a potentially important pathogenic target and demonstrated, in rat models of VF and resuscitation, that NHE-1 inhibition can ameliorate myocardial abnormalities relevant to cardiac resuscitation. In these models, NHE-1 inhibition reduced ischemic contracture during VF (improving the hemodynamic efficacy of chest compression), minimized postresuscitation ventricular ectopic activity (preventing recurrent VF), and lessened postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Wirth et al102 reported, in a swine model of regional coronary occlusion, similar antiarrhythmic effects of NHE-1 inhibition associated with preservation of the action potential duration. NHE-1 inhibition using the potent and selective inhibitor (cariporide) prevents stony heart and enables chest compression to maintain a coronary perfusion pressure above resuscitability thresholds.

Therapeutic Hypothermia During CPR
It is known that low body and brain temperature during cardiocirculatory arrest improves the neurologic outcome following these events. On the basis of the published evidence to date, the Advanced Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation made the recommendations that unconscious adult patients with spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest should be cooled to 32°C to 34°C for 12 to 24 h when the initial rhythm was VF. Such cooling may also be beneficial for other rhythms or in-hospital cardiac arrest.103 Mild hypothermia is thought to suppress many of the chemical reactions associated with reperfusion injury. These reactions include free radical production, excitatory amino acid release, and calcium shifts, which can in turn lead to mitochondrial damage and apoptosis.

Despite these potential advantages, hypothermia can also produce adverse effects, including arrhythmias, infection, and coagulopathy. Cooling should probably be initiated as soon as possible after restoration of spontaneous circulation but appears to be successful even if delayed up to 6 h.102,103 In the European study,104 the interval between restoration of spontaneous circulation and attainment of a core temperature of 32°C to 34°C had an interquartile range of 4 to 16 h; however, further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia, optimum target temperature, rates of cooling and rewarming, and the cooling techniques and monitoring.103104105

Community Education and Staff Training
The duration of cardiac arrest prior to the start of CPR in human victims is the best single predictor outcome; this will reflect the importance of early bystander CPR and rapid defibrillation as major contributors in the survival after cardiac arrest.106 Therefore, it is logical to bring 4-min defibrillation into the home, where 70% of cardiac arrests occur. Public access defibrillation (PAD) is available to achieve this goal; it is inexpensive, self-instructional, easy to operate, and automatic, requiring no diagnostic ability (the AED). Survival after cardiac arrest due to VF when nonmedically qualified personnel use an AED has ranged from 0 to 54% according to the degree of community education.7 Efforts are needed to emphasize that after 4 to 5 min of cardiac arrest without defibrillation, bystander CPR is essential and it should be performed even if a defibrillator is present, and for 2 to 3 min before defibrillation. PAD when combined with CPR in some settings outside hospitals resulted in a very large percentage of victims defibrillated within 4 min and a > 50% long-term survival rate.108109110 Hallstrom et al110 reported more survivors to hospital discharge in the units assigned to have volunteers trained in CPR plus the use of AEDs than those in the units assigned to have volunteers trained only in CPR. This is consistent with the concept of the large, multicenter National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute study111 in the United States and Canada; training was provided to lay volunteers, and AED sites had twice the number of survivors.


    Conclusion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Successful CPR needs redefinition. Postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction is recognized as a leading cause of early death following initially successful CPR. It could be a true stunning phenomenon, and this phenomenon is a reversible process, so it deserves more effort and early detection to avoid its progress to stony heart. Early defibrillation is the key, provided it has been applied in the proper phase. Further studies are warranted to highlight the concept of postresuscitation disease and its hemodynamic sequences. Introducing KATP openers, {delta}-opioid receptor agonists, antioxidants, intracellular calcium load modifiers, a sodium-hydrogen exchanger, and therapeutic hypothermia in the era of CPR are still in the experimental stages and need further studies. However, we need to standardize the conventional methods during CPR, reinforce the concept of PAD, have a well-trained team for prompt intervention, as well as promote public education to improve the outcome after successful resuscitation. There is an urgent need to revise the guidelines for CPR in community setting, but how? It is a matter of where and when it is of enough value to be efficacious and cost-effective.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: AED = automated external defibrillator; ATP = adenosine triphosphate; cAMP = cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KATP = adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium; LV = left ventricle/ventricular; NHE-1 = sodium-hydrogen exchanger isoform-1; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; PAD = public access defibrillation; PDE IIIi = phosphodiesterase III inhibitor; PEA = pulseless electrical activity; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VF = ventricular fibrillation

Received for publication December 21, 2004. Accepted for publication March 8, 2005.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Outcome of Resuscitation
 Factors Affecting the Outcome...
 Role of the Initial...
 Adrenergic Vasopressor During...
 Buffer Therapy
 Prevention of Postresuscitation...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Weisfeldt, ML, Kerber, RE, McGoldrick, RP, et al (1995) Public access defibrillation: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Task Force on Automatic External Defibrillation. Circulation 92,2763[Free Full Text]
  2. Kern, KB, Hilwig, RW, Rhee, KH, et al Myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: an example of global myocardial stunning. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28,232-240[Abstract]
  3. Tang, W, Weil, MH, Sun, S, et al Progressive myocardial dysfunction after cardiac resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1993;21,1046-1050[ISI][Medline]
  4. Gazmuir, RJ, Weil, MH, Bisera, J, et al Myocardial dysfunction after successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1996;24,992-1000[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Becker, LB, Smith, DW, Rhodes, KV Incidence of cardiac arrest: a neglected factor in evaluating survival rates. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22,86-91[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Vreede-Swagemakers, JJ, Gorgels, AP, Dubois-Arbouw, WI, et al Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990’s: a population-based study in the Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30,1500-1505[Abstract]
  7. Herlitz, J, Bahr, J, Fischer, M, et al Resuscitation in Europe: a tale of five European regions. Resuscitation 1999;41,121-131[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial 1 Study Group. A randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1986;314,397-403[Abstract]
  9. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial 2 Study Group. A randomized clinical study of calcium-entry blocker in the treatment of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1991;324,1125-1131
  10. Becker, LB, Ostrander, MP, Barrett, J, et al Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area: where are the survivors? Ann Emerg Med 1991;20,355-361[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Cerchiari, EL, Safar, P, Klein, E, et al Cardiovascular function and neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest in dogs: the cardiovascular post-resuscitation syndrome. Resuscitation 1993;25,9-33[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Laurent, I, Monchi, M, Chiche, J, et al Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40,2110-2116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bernard, SA, Gray, TW, Buist, MD, et al Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346,557-5633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schoenenberger, RA, von Planta, M, von Planta, I Survival after failed out-of-hospital resuscitation. Arch Intern Med 1994;154,2433-2437[Abstract]
  15. van Walraven, C, Forster, AJ, Alan, J, et al Validation of a clinical decision aid to discontinue in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitations. JAMA 2001;285,1602-1606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ebell, MH Pre-arrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 1992;34,551-558[ISI][Medline]
  17. Larsen, MP, Eisenberg, MS, Cummins, RO, et al Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22,1652-1658[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Wik, L Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003;58,267-269[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Ewy, G A new approach for out of hospital CPR: a bold step forward. Resuscitation 2003;58,271-272[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Ewy, GA Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: strengthening the links in the chain of survival. N Engl J Med 2000;342,1599-1601[Free Full Text]
  21. Bolli, R Oxygen-derived free radicals and myocardial reperfusion injury: an overview. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 1991;5,249-268
  22. Mori, E, Haramaki, N, Ikeda, H, et al Intracoronary administration of L-arginine aggravates myocardial stunning through production of peroxynitrite in dogs. Cardiovasc Res 1998;40,113-123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nossuli, TO, Hayward, R, Scalia, R, et al Peroxynitrite reduces myocardial infarct size and preserves coronary endothelium after ischemia and reperfusion in cats. Circulation 1997;96,2317-2324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kudejl, K, Kim, SJ, Shen, YT, et al Adverse effects of nitric oxide inhibition on cardiac function and necrosis with coronary stenosis in conscious pigs [abstract]. Circulation 1998;98,I620
  25. Zhang, YI, Jeffrey, W, Bissing, DO, et al Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors decrease coronary sinus-free radical concentration and ameliorate myocardial stunning in an ischemia-reperfusion model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38,546-54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Adrie, C, Minou, Adib-Conquy, Laurent, I, et al Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest as a "sepsis-like" syndrome. Circulation 2002;106,562-568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Adrie, C, Laurent, I, Monchi, M, et al Postresuscitation disease after cardiac arrest: a sepsis-like syndrome?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2004;10,208-212[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Niemann, JT, Garner, D, Lewis, RJ Tumor necrosis factor-[alpha] is associated with early postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Crit Care Med 2004;32,1753-1758[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Linder, KH, Strohmenger, HU, Ensinger, H, et al Stress hormone response during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesthesiology 1992;77,662-668[ISI][Medline]
  30. Killingsworth, CR, Wei, CC, Dell’Italia, LJ, et al Short-acting ß-adrenergic antagonist esmolol given at reperfusion improves survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2004;109,2469-2474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Braunwald, E, Kloner, RA The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation, 1982;66,1146-1149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bolli, R, Marban, E Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial stunning. Physiol Rev 1999;79,609-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Bashir, R, Padder, FA, Khan, FA Myocardial stunning following respiratory arrest. Chest 1995;108,1459-1460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kern, KB postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. In: emergency cardiovascular care. Cardiol Clin 2002;20,93-94
  35. Koretsune, Y, Marban, E Mechanism of ischemic contracture in ferret hearts: relative roles of [Ca2+]i elevation and ATP depletion. Am J Physiol 1990;258,H9-H16
  36. Takino, M, Okada, Y Firm myocardium in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 1996;33,101-106[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  37. Klouche, K, Weil, MH, Sun, S, et al Evolution of the stone heart after prolonged cardiac arrest. Chest 2002;122,1006-1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Eisenberg, MS, Horwood, BT, Cummins, RO, et al Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19,179-186[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Becker, LB, Ostrander, MP, Barrett, J, et al Outcomes of CPR in a large metropolitan are—where are the survivors. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20,355-361[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  40. Lombardi, G, Gallagher, J, Gennis, P Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City: the pre-hospital arrest survival evaluation (PHASE) study. JAMA 1994;271,678-683[Abstract]
  41. Stratton, S, Niemann, JT Effects of adding links to "the chain of survival" for prehospital cardiac arrest: a contrast in outcomes in 1975 and 1995 at a single institution. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31,471-477[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  42. Eisenberg, M, Hallstrom, A, Bergner, L The ACLS score: predicting survival from out-of hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1981;246,50-52[Abstract]
  43. Chambless, L, Keil, U, Dobson, A, et al Population versus clinical view of case fatality from acute coronary heart disease: results from the WHO MONICA Project 1985–1990. Circulation 1997;96,3849-3859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bayes de Luna, A, Coumel, P, Leclerq, JF Ambulatory sudden cardiac death: mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 cases. Am Heart J 1989;117,151-159[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  45. McIntyre, KM Vasopressin in a systolic cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2004;350,179-181[Free Full Text]
  46. Hargarten, KM, Stueven, HA, Waite, EM, et al Prehospital experience with defibrillation of coarse ventricular fibrillation: a ten-year review. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19,157-162[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  47. Warner, LL, Hoffman, JR, Baraff, LJ Prognostic significance of field response in out-of hospital ventricular fibrillation. Chest 1985;87,22-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Cummins, RO, Austin, D The frequency of "occult" ventricular fibrillation masquerading as a flat line in prehospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17,813-817[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  49. Noc, M, Weil, MH, Tang, W, et al Electrocardiographic prediction of the success of cardiac resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1999;27,708-714[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  50. Strohmenger, HU, Lindner, KH, Brown, CG Analysis of the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal amplitude and frequency parameters as predictors of countershock success in humans. Chest 1997;111,584-589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Mahmud, R, Hsia, P, Jolly, SR, et al Changes in transmyocardial impedance during prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Implications for current flow and delivered energy during DC countershock. Am Heart J 1990;120,334-339[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  52. Humphrey, SM, Gavin, JB, Herdson, PB Catecholamine-depletion and the no-reflow phenomenon in anoxic and ischemic rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1982;14,151-161[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  53. Halperin, HR, Guerci, AD Vasoconstrictors during CPR: are they used optimally? Chest 1990;97,787-789
  54. Jennings, RB, Reimer, KA, Steenbergen, CJ Myocardial ischemia revisited: the osmolar load, membrane damage and reperfusion. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1986;18,769-780[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  55. Zaugg, CE, Ziegler, A, Lee, RJ, et al Postresuscitation stunning: postfibrillatory myocardial dysfunction caused by reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness after ventricular fibrillation-induced myocyte Ca2+ overload. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13,1017-1024[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  56. Osswald, S, Trouton, TG, O’Nunain, SS, et al Relation between shock related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model. Circulation 1994;90,2501-2509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Xie, J, Weil, MH, Sun, SJ, et al High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of post resuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Circulation 1997;96,683-688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Tang, W, Weil, MH, Sun, S, et al The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43,1228-1235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Leng, T, Norman, A Paradis, HC, et al. Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation. Circulation 2000;101,2968-2974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Caterine, MR, Spencer, KT, Pagan-Carlo, LA, et al Direct-current shocks to the heart generate free radicals: an electron paramagnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28,1598-1609[Abstract]
  61. Yamaguchi, H, Weil, M, Tang, W, et al Myocardial dysfunction after electrical defibrillation. Resuscitation 2002;54,289-296[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  62. Sanders, AB, Ewy, GA, Taft, TV Prognostic and therapeutic importance of the aortic diastolic pressure in resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1984;12,871-873[ISI][Medline]
  63. Futterman, LG, Lemberg, L Cardiopulmonary resuscitation review: critical role of chest compressions. Am J Crit Care 2005;14,81-84[Free Full Text]
  64. Hallstrom, A, Cobb, L, Johnson, E, et al Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000;342,1546-1553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Wik, L, Hansen, TB, Fylling, F, et al Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;,289; 1389–1395
  66. Yu, T, Weil, MH, Tang, W, et al Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 2002;106,368-372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Tang, W, Weil, MH, Sun, S, et al Epinephrine increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Circulation 1995;92,3089-3093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Hilwig, RW, Berg, RA, Kern, KB, et al Endothelin-1 vasoconstriction during swine CPR improves coronary perfusion pressures but worsens postresuscitation outcome. Circulation 2000;101,2097-2102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Tang, W, Weil, MH, Gazmuri, RJ, et al Pulmonary ventilation/perfusion defects induced by epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1991;84,2101-2107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Wilhelm, B, Kittler, H, Sterz, F, et al Cumulative dose of epinephrine during CPR and neurologic outcome. Ann Intern Med 1998;129,450-456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Lindner, K, Ahnefeld, F, Bowdler, I Comparison of different doses of epinephrine on myocardial perfusion and resuscitation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pig model. Am J Emerg Med 1991;9,27-31[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  72. Brown, CG, Martin, DR, Pepe, PE, et al The Multicenter High-Dose Epinephrine Study Group. A comparison of standard-dose and high dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital. N Engl J Med 1992;327,1051-1057[Abstract]
  73. Callaham, M, Madsen, CD, Barton, CW, et al Randomized clinical trial of high-dose epinephrine and norepinephrine vs standard-dose epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1992;268,2667-2672[Abstract]
  74. Berg, RA, Otto, CW, Kern, KB, et al A randomized, blinded trial of high dose epinephrine versus standard-dose epinephrine in swine model of pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1996;24,1695-1700[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  75. Berg, RA, Hilwig, RW, Kern, KB, et al High dose epinephrine with ß-blocker during CPR results in worse outcome than standard-dose epinephrine with or without ß-blocker [abstract]. Crit Care Med 1998;26,A56
  76. Bleske, BE, Warren, EW, Rice, TL, et al Effect of high-dose sodium bicarbonate on the vasopressor effects of epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pharmacotherapy 1995;15,660-664[ISI][Medline]
  77. Marsh, JD, Margolis, TI, Kim, D Mechanism of diminished contractile response to catecholamine during acidosis. Am J Physiol 1988;254,1120-1127