|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Anesthesiology (Dr. Barak), Rambam Medical Center, Haifa; and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine (Dr. Katz), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Correspondence to: Yeshayahu Katz, MD, DSc, Department of Anesthesiology, HaEmek Medical Center, Afula 18101, Israel; e-mail: ykatz18{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: dialysis lung pulmonary hypertension surgery
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The earth has bubbles, as the water has, and, these are of them. Whither are they vanished?
Banquo
Into the air; and what seemd corporal melted as breath into the wind... "
Macbeth, Act I, Scene III William Shakespeare
The rapid advancement of technology in the past few decades has brought new areas to medical practice. One recent development is the detection of microbubbles by ultrasound. Using this updated technique, clinicians and researchers have found that the phenomenon of microbubbles is widespread. Microbubbles originate mainly in extracorporeal lines and devices, such as cardiopulmonary bypass and dialysis machines, but may be endogenous in cases of decompression sickness or mechanical heart valves. Circulating in the blood stream, microbubbles lodge in the capillary bed of various organs, causing local reactions. Our natural tendency is to overlook minute particles, some of which are invisible, believing them to be harmless. However, solid data show that microbubbles are of clinical importance. In this review, we present evidence of the biological and clinical effects of microbubbles, as demonstrated by studies in animal models and humans, and discuss the management of the microbubble problem with regard to detection, prevention, and treatment.
| Definition |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The composition of a gas bubble is usually air or oxygen, although the medical use of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and nitrogen can also result in gas emboli.567 Gas composition affects bubble elimination time in the body, since each gas has its own solubility coefficient and diffusion coefficient in a given fluid.8 It is reasonable to believe that gas composition also affects local tissue reaction and systemic response, although research on this subject is limited.9
Gas bubbles usually originate in extracorporeal tubing, infusing with the fluids into the blood stream. The bubbles may be present while priming and preparing the lines for use, or newly formed as a result of turbulent flow in the tubing and at the vascular access. Differences in temperature is another possible cause for bubble generation in lines, since warming initiates bubble formation, such as when an active blood warming system is used.10 The course of the bubble in an extracorporeal infusion set is affected by many factors, principally two opposing forces: firstly, the buoyant force of a bubble, which takes it upward in a standard drip chamber; and, secondly, the driving force of the fluid flow, by which the bubble is carried into the patients body. For illustration purposes, assuming a flow rate of 8.33 · 106 m3 s1 (500 mL/min1) [flow rate of a rapid infusion system], these forces are equal to a 441 · 06 m (441 µm) diameter air bubble in the blood, which means that a smaller bubble will be carried into the patients blood stream and a larger bubble will remain in the drip chamber.
Microbubbles may be created de novo in a patient without connection to the extracorporeal system. One example is the decompression sickness (DCS) of divers, and another is the mechanical prosthetic heart valve, generating microbubbles that are demonstrated in vivo.111213 Both conditions will be discussed later in this review. There is a spectrum of scenarios in which the extremes are a single exposure to very high volumes in contrast to recurrent chronic exposure to small volumes of microbubbles. The clinical implications of the microbubble phenomenon depends on the extent and cumulative effect of such an event.14
| Dynamics of Microbubble Elimination |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bubble dissolvance occurs when the surface tension sets off diffusion of the gas to the surrounding liquid phase as it generates an overpressure inside the bubble.20 According to the Epstein-Plesset equation, dissolution times for an air bubble in water are 1 s for a 106 m3 (1 µm) radius bubble, 1 to 6 s for 105 m (10 µm), 100 to 600 s for 104 m (100 µm), and 1 to 6 million s (11 to 70 days!) for 103 m (1 mm) bubble. It is important to note that these numbers refer to a spherical bubble in water. In the human body, the shape of the bubble changes during its journey in the circulation, becoming more elongated and slender as it floats further into the periphery. As the bubble is entrapped in the vessel, it is remodeled into a cylinder with hemispherical end cups.21 In a typical entrapped bubble, the length of the cylindrical bubble is greater than its radius. Therefore, the dissolution time is increased by at least 50% compared to the calculated absorption time for a spherical bubble with the same initial volume.21 Regarding the liquid composition, a layer of denaturated proteins has been seen at the bubble-blood interface,2122 further slowing down the bubble disappearance process in vivo. When the gas composition is not air, bubble elimination time may be changed as well.212324 It could be concluded that the theoretical model derived from the Epstein-Plesset equation underestimates the actual life span of a gas bubble in the body, hence its possible harmful effects.
There have been studies2526 that demonstrate the beneficial effect of surfactant on bubble elimination. It seems that by changing the bubble surface tension, a surfactant promotes bubble absorption. It also reduces bubble adhesion forces and, in this way, protects the endothelium from additional injury.27 The beneficial effect of surfactants has been demonstrated in vitro, although it has not been tried in humans for microbubble elimination.
| Mechanisms of Microbubble Tissue Damage |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Inflammatory Response
Our understanding of microbubble-induced inflammatory response originates from early studies3536 of pulmonary edema in animal models. Neutrophils play a central role in mediating air embolism-induced lung injury. They aggregate around the bubble to produce clumps. A local destructive process takes place, probably by superoxide and hydroxyl radical production and proteolytic enzyme release. These molecules increase membrane permeability to fluids and proteins and facilitate interstitial pulmonary edema.30 A study37 of leukopenic animals showed that leukocyte depletion attenuated the increased microvascular permeability that follows venous air embolization. The pathophysiologic process is independent of bubble composition and starts as the circulating bubble is trapped in a small arteriole (diameter 104 to 103 m) [100 to 1,000 µm] or in a capillary.38 Although evidence for the inflammatory response to microbubbles is solid, our understanding of the pathophysiologic process is incomplete and awaits further investigation.
The Complement
Activation of complement by circulating microbubbles commences at the air-liquid interface that surrounds gas-filled particle.3940 Ward et al41 demonstrated that prior depletion of complement proteins with a cobra venom factor reduced the occurrence of complement activation and lowered the incidence of decompression sickness in rabbits. In humans, Stevens et al42 reported that increased levels of activated plasma proteins, C3a and C5a, correlated with the occurrence of DCS after saturation diving. C3a and C5a trigger polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and stimulate mast cells to release histamine, which increases vascular permeability. Activated PMNs further augment tissue damage by releasing cytotoxic substances, such as active oxygen metabolites and arachidonic acid products.4344 PMN-derived oxygen metabolites cause lipid peroxidation in endothelial cell membranes. The arachidonic acid products such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes are vasoactive factors, and all alter microvascular permeability. In order to attenuate the complement-mediated endothelial damage resulting from gaseous microemboli, Nossum et al45 used anti-C5a monoclonal antibodies preparation. They showed reduced PMN infiltration in pretreated rabbits compared with the control group and concluded that anti-C5a protects the endothelium against injury caused by small amounts of gas bubbles. It is therefore concluded that complement activation is involved in microbubble-induced tissue damage.
The Clotting System
Microbubbles affect clotting through both activating coagulation and inducing platelet aggregation. The result is clot formation at the bubble proximity. Later, fibrinolysis and local reaction to the thrombus occurs. The bubble surface acts as a foreign substance and activates the coagulation cascade.46 Microbubble gas-blood interface adsorbs macromolecules that are normally present in the blood. The adsorption provokes molecular conformational changes, such as unfolding, and exposes regions of proteins that trigger blood coagulation.22 Using thrombin production assay, sparging (microbubble embolization) increases thrombin production 2.1- to 3.7-fold compared with bubble-free blood.47 The addition of surfactants to the coagulation assay attenuated thrombin production in sparged samples by 30 to 70%, probably due to occupancy of the gas-blood interface.
Early studies4849 have shown that platelets adhere to the bubble surfaces, where the bubbles act as platelet agonists with respect to aggregation. Additionally, microbubble-induced endothelial damage causes tissue factor expression and subsequent platelet activation and thrombus generation.4950 Platelets accumulation around air bubbles in the blood occurs due to cellular reaction, but also as a result of the physicochemical flotation process, as Ritz-Timme et al51 demonstrated. In their study, attachment of particles (cells) to flowing air bubbles in an aqueous medium (blood) was demonstrated. By plugging blood vessels, the thrombus causes hypoxic local damage.52 Indeed, prophylactic heparinization had been shown to reduce neurologic impairment after cerebral arterial air embolism in the rabbit,53 verifying that some of the damage is due to thromboinflammatory responses at sites of air-injured endothelium. Another direction may be preventing platelet accumulation using antiplatelet drugs. Moon et al54 proposed that antiplatelet drugs, combined with other pharmacologic agents, may be useful adjuncts to recompression therapy in cases of decompression sickness and iatrogenic gas embolism, although this treatment "requires further study."
| Clinical Consequences of Circulating Microbubbles |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients comorbidity may also influence the outcome of circulating air emboli. When there is a right-to-left shunt, venous air emboli may traverse to the arterial circulation and cause organ ischemia. Such a course of events is termed paradoxical air embolism,62 and there are a few mechanisms by which it may occur. One is passage of gas through a cardiac right-to-left shunt into the systemic circulation. The prevalence of a cardiac right-to-left shunt ranges between 15 to 40% in various studies,6364 usually as a result of patent foramen ovale but may be caused by other cardiac anatomic anomalies. Neonates are vulnerable to developing arterialization of venous air since the foramen ovale may remain patent for some time after birth.65 A right-to-left shunt might also be extra-cardiac, mostly from dilatation of pulmonary vessels, causing an intrapulmonary shunt in ARDS. In many cases the existence of such a shunt is unknown to the patient or physician, and the risk of paradoxical emboli is not taken into account. The passage of air emboli from the venous to the arterial circulation occurs also when the volume of air is vast. The pulmonary circulation filtration capability had been studied by Butler and colleagues36667 in animal models. They found that when a volume of venous air emboli was > 3.5 · 107 m3 kg1 (0.35 mL kg1) the filtration threshold was exceeded, leading to arterial spillover of bubbles in 50% of the animals, and increased to 71% for an air dose of 4 · 107 m3 kg1 (0.40 mL kg1). These studies draw attention to the possibility of each venous air embolism turning into an arterial one, depending on gas volume and injection time. The lung itself is injured by performing the nonrespiratory function of filtering the venous blood, while protecting the arterial system from microemboli. Researchers have simulated microembolic conditions in animal models in order to examine the resultant changes in the lungs. Various models have been used. One model applied starch microemboli (diameter [63 to 74] · 106 m [63 to 74 µm]) to investigate blood gas alterations following embolism.686970 In another animal model, glass beads (diameter [1 to 5]) · 104 m [100 to 500 µm]) were injected into lambs377172 or dogs.28 A model of air emboli was used as well.303132 All studies clearly demonstrated that pulmonary edema is the end point of venous embolism and, when repeated, the structural pathologic changes in the lung resemble those seen in pulmonary hypertension.3334
Scientific evidence from humans is limited; nevertheless, it supports most of the laboratory findings. The inflammatory response following pulmonary microemboli has been reported in a few cases.7374 CT scan and pulmonary function tests demonstrated the effect of pulmonary emboli on the lung to cause air trapping and mosaic perfusion.7576 These publications refer to cases of macroscopic pulmonary emboli and not microbubble events. Investigations on human lungs following microbubble injury are found mainly in the diving medicine literature and are discussed below.
| Procedures and Events Generating Microbubbles |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There are several factors that contribute to the adverse neurologic outcome after open-heart surgery, such as reduced cerebral blood flow, local or systemic inflammatory response, cellular edema, and the effect of anesthetic drugs. These factors along with gas and solid emboli from the cardiopulmonary bypass set and from endovascular origin produce cumulative effects on brain function during and after surgery.8317 Cardiopulmonary bypass machines are used in most open-heart surgeries to oxygenate and pump the blood while the heart is arrested. Solid or gas emboli from various sources in the extracorporeal set and tubes may drift into the aorta and systemic circulation.9192 To minimize embolization, a screen filter is installed on the arterial line that returns blood to the aorta. The filter pores are 28 to 40 · 106 m (28 to 40 µm), allowing smaller emboli to pass through. Nevertheless, larger air and fat emboli also pass through and enter the circulation downstream to the filter whenever their load is high.8917 Microbubbles that traverse the filter join and become large bubbles. Air, atherosclerotic debris, and fat microemboli that enter the systemic circulation and arrive at the brain cause neuronal necrosis by blocking small cerebral vessels.93 It has been established that postoperative adverse neurologic deficit correlates positively with numbers of emboli to which the patient is exposed during surgery.949596
Several methods have been suggested, aimed at reducing the risk of neurologic complications following open-heart surgery. One of the main strategies to avoid brain injury is reducing emboli load during surgery.979899 Other means to improve the neurologic outcome include modification of surgical techniques100101 and the use of neuroprotective anesthetic techniques and drugs to enhance cerebral oxygenation and decrease cellular metabolism.102103104 None of the above measures resulted in complete brain protection, but practicing a few together may be beneficial. Further protective means are warranted to improve outcome in the clinical scene.
Hemodialysis
As far back as 1975, there was evidence of pulmonary microembolization during hemodialysis.105 The subject of dialysis-induced microemboli has been revisited, mainly as a consequence of better detection technology, raising major concerns as to whether their presence can be overlooked or if practical means of emboli elimination must be developed. In 2000, Woltmann et al106 used B-mode and spectral mode ultrasound to detect microemboli occurring in the hemodialysis access of two patients. The authors postulated that these microemboli developed from turbulent blood flow around the venous access. A prospective study107 of 25 patients published that year showed microemboli in the subclavian vein (downstream from the arteriovenous fistula); the authors concluded that gas microemboli are formed by the blood pump of the hemodialysis machine. In 2002, Droste and colleagues108 used pulsed-Doppler ultrasound to demonstrate a continuous shower of microemboli into the pulmonary vasculature during dialysis and hypothesized that this may explain the high pulmonary morbidity in long-term dialysis patients. Those microemboli are most probably gaseous, as suggested by the ultrasound high relative intensity signal. The origin of these microbubbles may be in air bubbles already in the hemodialysis tubes and filter before the procedure, or entering the blood stream during connection and disconnection of the lines, or formation of gas bubbles as the result of pressure gradients and turbulent flow in the tubes and access. In a follow-up study,109 a significant reduction of microembolization was found when prefilled instead of dry dialyzers were used. The majority of these studies imply that the composition of microemboli detected during dialysis is gas.
Today, hemodialysis devices are equipped with ultrasonic detectors of air larger than 850 · 106 m (850 µm) and alarms that announce the occurrence of an extremely large air bubble event. Smaller emboli, however, even in large numbers, do not activate the alarm. In the past, two cases of dialysis equipment recall were enforced by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the first, in 1992, approximately 4,000 devices were rejected due to failure of the ultrasonic bubble system, which resulted in air observed in the venous line that reached the patients.110 The second US Food and Drug Administration recall included approximately 3,000 hemodialysis devices in which air bubbles were detected in the extracorporeal system.111 These cases illustrate the shortcomings of current ultrasonic bubble detectors, which are set to discover relatively large bubbles but allow the entrance of smaller but significant microbubbles.
The patient with end-stage renal failure undergoes approximately three sessions of hemodialysis a week, 150 sessions yearly. Each session takes a few hours, in which the patient is exposed to a microbubble shower. Microbubbles originate from the dialysis tubes or filter flow in the venous vasculature and are trapped in the pulmonary circulation. Thus, the hemodialysis patient may suffer both acute and chronic lung injury due to a microbubble shower. Regarding the acute effect, the main clinical indication for respiratory insult is hypoxemia, which is a well-known symptom during hemodialysis.112 Several theories have been suggested to explain this event, such as hypoventilation due to changes of pH, direct effect of acetate on the central respiratory center, and increased alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient due to complement activation.113 Nevertheless, the damage caused by exposure to loads of microbubbles should not be overlooked in explaining acute hypoxemia during hemodialysis. Chronically, the recurrent ongoing microbubble lung injury may explain the high pulmonary morbidity, manifested as increased pulmonary artery pressure, of long-term dialysis patients,114115 and is "a mimic of pulmonary thromboembolism."116 It has been established that > 30% of hemodialysis, but not peritoneal dialysis, patients had pulmonary hypertension that normalized when kidney transplantation was performed.117118 The occurrence of pulmonary hypertension as a result of recurrent events of air emboli was demonstrated decades ago in animal models.3334 Studies in hemodialysis patients focusing on the connection between microbubble load and development of pulmonary hypertension are warranted.
The damage caused by microbubbles may be more detrimental in case of cardiac or extracardiac right-to-left shunt, which may be found in up to 40% of the population.64 In those cases, air emboli may enter the cerebral circulation and cause varying degrees of neurologic damage.119 Indeed, the above-noted clinical studies106107108109 that described microemboli during dialysis had either no patient with a shunt108109 or did not report that detail in the study.106107 Nevertheless, it is reasonable to believe that a patient with a right-to-left shunt is at higher risk for neurologic morbidity as a result of venous air embolism during hemodialysis. Cerebral atrophy and deterioration of neurocognitive functions in chronic hemodialysis patients is a recognized problem that correlates with the duration of dialysis treatment.120121122 Various factors may promote cerebral atrophy in these patients, such as uremic neuropathy, aluminum intoxication, impaired cerebral circulation, and hypertension. The additional risk of cerebral damage due to microbubbles has not been investigated yet.
High-Flow Lines
The use of high-flow lines is prevalent in almost every operating room where major surgery is performed, in ICUs, emergency shock-trauma departments, and whenever massive blood loss is predicted.123124 Most current devices use large-bore, low-resistance fluid sets that enable the administration of a large volume and, at the same time, warming the infused solution or blood. The devices are equipped with an "air eliminator" designed to vent air from the line before entering the patient. Nevertheless, these eliminators are ineffective when large volumes are administered125126 and in eliminating microbubbles. The air in the system originates from three sources: it may be in the line before its priming and flushed in with the fluids; it may come from newly formed bubbles caused by turbulent flow (the amount of air detected in high flow lines correlates with flow rates10); and, finally, as one of the manufacturers of these devices warns, microbubbles are released from the fluid as it is warmed.127 These microbubbles are formed continuously within the system and present a constant source of air. It is hard to evaluate the damage caused to the patient from microbubble exposure. In the scenario of massive bleeding and an unstable patient, the physician who resuscitates the patient cannot pay attention to each air bubble. Furthermore, some of these bubbles are small and, in the viscous transfused blood, are practically invisible. Therefore, new and effective air eliminators are needed to improve our detection and prevention of microbubbles in high flow systems.
Mechanical Heart Valves
In the early 1990s, a phenomenon of spontaneous endogenous ultrasound signals was reported in patients with a mechanical mitral valve.128 The echocardiographic signal was described as bright and of high velocity; it appeared during systole and was regarded at first as an artifact. Later, improvement of ultrasound technology led researchers to recognize that the echocardiographic signal represented microbubbles formed due to local high-pressure gradients at the level of the valve leaflets, a process known as cavitation.129 Kaps et al130 succeeded in reducing echocardiographic signals in patients with mechanical heart valves by breathing 100% oxygen under hyperbaric conditions, proving that these microemboli were gaseous and not solid. Deklunder et al13131132 used transcranial Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic mechanical and biological heart valves with neurologic symptoms. They found that high-intensity transient signals were frequently found in the cerebral arteries of patients with mechanical heart valves. They attributed these signals to microbubbles formed by cavitation. Furthermore, they assumed that cognitive impairments may occur in these patients due to persistent microbubble generation by the valve, and confirmed this hypothesis by showing a significant decrease in working memory performance in patients with mechanical heart valves compared with biological valves and control subjects. Girod et al133 suggested another explanation for microbubble formation by the mechanical valve. In their in vitro study,133 they measured the dimensions of the bubbles and the time of their appearance. They concluded that microbubbles are the result of degassing of CO2 in blood rather than the cavitation effect, since cavitation is a physical phenomenon of short duration whereas bubble formation by a mechanical heart valve is a much longer generation period, matching the degassing hypothesis. The finding of microbubble formation drives intensive engineering efforts to construct the optimal valve design that will be devoid of gas microembolization.14134
Diving and DCS
The four main pathologies in diving medicine are barotraumas (cranial sinuses, otic and pulmonary), DCS, pulmonary edema, and toxic effect of increased partial pressure of gases.135 The pathophysiology related to diving morbidity and mortality results from gas behavior during altering pressures. Similarly, aviation medicine and some of the extreme-sport types, such as air diving, contend with the same health problems due to intense changes in ambient pressure.
According to Boyles law, in constant temperature the pressure (P) varies inversely as volume (V): P1V1 = P2V2. Thus, for every 10 m of depth diving, the pressure increases one atmosphere and air volume decreases 50%. The opposite happens on returning to the surface. Acute changes of pressure affect mainly organs and cavities that contain gas. As the pressure decreases, the gas volume expands and may rupture the surrounding membranes, causing barotrauma.
Another physical gas law is the Henry law, which states that the amount of a given gas dissolved in a liquid at a constant temperature is directly proportional to the partial pressure of that gas. Accordingly, when a diver breathes air in high pressure, air from the lungs is dissolved in body fluids and blood and is transported to peripheral organs. Oxygen is used for tissue metabolism, while nitrogen, which is physiologically inert, is not.136 As the diver returns to surface level, the gas saturation in the fluid decreases and nitrogen bubbles are formed in all tissues causing DCS. This process depends on the rate of change in pressures and is termed DCS. The US Navy and the Royal Navy have decompression tables, instructing the use of stops in returning to the surface and enabling body adjustment to changes in pressure, thus reducing the risk of DCS. Nevertheless, severe DCS has been described within safe table limits.137 Early studies138139 detected bubbles in the circulation of asymptomatic divers during decompression. These findings indicate that bubble formation may be clinically silent to some degree or amount of bubbles. DCS is an accurate example of humans exposed to microbubbles in the circulation, and thus can demonstrate the clinical presentation of that event. It is customary to classify DCS into two types based on the severity of symptoms.136 Type 1 DCS is milder, expressed by joint pain, pruritus, and skin rash. More severe symptoms are seen in type 2 DCS. These are neurologic symptoms such as headache, blurred vision, parenthesis, paraparesis and, in serious cases, convulsions and death. The neurologic manifestations are attributed to bubble embolization in the CNS. Again, clinical studies140141 suggest that subclinical cerebral damage occurs in divers, raising the possibility that microbubble damage is underdiagnosed due to difficulties in detection and not because they are not present. The effect of recurrent diving was described by Skogstad et al,142 who conducted a study of lung function in professional divers and found that exposure to diving contributed to changes in pulmonary function, mostly affecting small airway conductance. The authors interpreted these changes as thickening of bronchiole walls and loss of lung elasticity.
The effect of recurrent diving on brain function has been studied over the years, using various tests. EEG, CT, and MRI were used, as well as neuropsychologic tests. Although most researchers143144145146 found pathologic alterations comparing professional and recreational divers to control subjects, contradictory results have been published as well.147 Most authors,143145146 however, agree that the prevalence of changes in divers is inversely related to diving depth, cumulative diving time, participation in "unsafe diving," and DCS. The pathophysiology of the cumulative effect of recurrent diving is not yet fully understood and may be the basis for comprehension microbubble injury.
| Detection and Prevention of Microbubble Exposure |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Filters
Knowing the possible clinical consequences of microbubble exposure, it is agreed that prevention is the best policy, which means eliminating air from fluids before they enter the body. There are several filters used for microbubble elimination. The most common is a filter that is installed on the line and functions as a dense net for bubbles, as in cardiopulmonary bypass machines (see above). The filter traps bubbles that are larger than its pores. There are a few disadvantages to the use of these filters. The add-on to the tubing increases resistance to flow, as indicated by a pressure drop through the filter.159160 Moreover, when filtering blood, after a short time of function, it is filled with debris and fibrin and the resistance increases even further. In severe cases, the used filter may completely block the flow within the line. In addition, chemicals within the filter activate coagulation cascade, the complement, the immune response, and other biological reactions to foreign materials. A third disadvantage is the hazard of the chemical composing the filter, which may be toxic, as happened in 2001 in Europe.161 In that case, the deaths of more than 50 hemodialysis patients have been linked to the dialysis membrane. Investigators found the deaths were connected to a solvent chemical used in the manufacturing process not completely removed from the filters. The last disadvantage of filters in use today is their inability to eliminate all microbubbles from the system, as demonstrated in open-heart surgery.1789 The conclusion of these disadvantages is that the future optimal device for microbubble elimination should use technologies other than mechanical obstructing filtering devices. For example, a multipurpose ultrasonic bubble detector and neutralizer capable of filtering small microbubbles from the blood, was recently developed (Thera-Sonics Ultrasound Technologies; Jordan Valley, Israel). It uses an ultrasound field to push microbubbles through an acoustic transparent module where they can be collected and removed. The possibility of affecting microbubbles in the blood by ultrasound was already shown by Schwarz et al.162 Another type of filter was evaluated by Schonburg et al,163 who tested a dynamic bubble trap in which the bubbles are directed to the center of the blood flow and collected in its distal end, where they are returned to the reservoir. Schonburg et al163 found a significant reduction of microbubbles in the arterial line while using the DBT.
| Management |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The use of drugs in air embolism is empirical and controversial.5459 Most studies examined cases of cerebral air emboli and followed the neurologic outcome. Several drugs were tested in patients with air emboli, especially for managing complications and reducing their rate. Heparin inhibits thromboinflammatory processes, thus could decrease neurologic impairment after cerebral air embolism. It was tested in an animal model and found to be effective only when given prophylactically in massive air emboli.53 Barbiturates reduce cerebral oxygen consumption, lower intracranial pressure, and inhibit release of endogenous catecholamines. Due to these beneficial effects, barbiturates are sometimes used for brain protection and may be helpful in cases of cerebral air emboli.59 Two decades ago, steroids were used to reduce cerebral edema following air emboli,170171 but later studies showed that corticosteroids increase ischemic injury172 and their use is no longer recommended. Experiments using animal models showed that lidocaine improves recovery following cerebral air emboli.173174 Lidocaine was found to be neuroprotective also in patients undergoing cardiac surgery;175 nevertheless, it is not part of standard care in air emboli. While the above-mentioned drugs failed to improve outcome following massive air emboli, they could have a potential place in microbubble injury.
There is encouraging experimental data on fluorocarbon compounds, which have high gas-dissolving capacity, may increase oxygen delivery and help shrink gas bubbles because of their high diffusion gradient.176177 Other studies27178 have presented surfactants as a possible compound that may change bubble adhesion by altering interfacial forces and reducing bubble absorption time. These future solutions deserve testing in humans after proved efficacy and safety in animal models.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() |
is the surface tension, r is the radius of the bubble, and t is time.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 17, 2005. Accepted for publication April 18, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|