|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Raghu, Ms. Spada, and Ms. Hayes), and the Department of Surgery (Dr. Pelligrini), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Yang), Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Correspondence to: Ganesh Raghu, MD, FCCP, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific, Campus Box 356522, Seattle, WA 98195-6522; e-mail: graghu{at}u.washington.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives: To follow the course of IPF in patients while being treated for acid GER alone.
Methods: A retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of four patients with newly diagnosed IPF and increased acid GER who chose to be treated solely with anti-acid GER therapy were followed up regularly with pulmonary function tests (PFTs) [measuring FVC and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide] over a period of 2 to 6 years. Anti-acid GER therapy was administered using proton-pump inhibitors and fundoplication, if needed. Adequate suppression of acid GER was ascertained by 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.
Main results: PFT results in all four patients stabilized or improved while their conditions were maintained with adequate treatment for acid GER. All patients were alive at the last follow-up, and none manifested an acute exacerbation of IPF or needed treatment for respiratory problems during this period. After maintaining 4 years of improved status (based on PFT and exercise testing findings) while adhering to treatment for acid GER, one patients deterioration correlated with poor compliance to daily treatment during the fifth year, although the PFT results at the sixth year showed stabilization compared to baseline values. The condition of another patient was stabilized by adhering to anti-acid GER treatment after an initial period of deterioration that was associated with nonadherence
Conclusions: Future clinical studies are indicated to clarify the role of acid GER in IPF and to determine whether adequate treatment for increased acid GER in part improves the outcome of patients with IPF.
Key Words: acid gastroesophageal reflux fundoplication idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis proton pump inhibitor
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Optimal therapy for IPF is problematic.10 To date, treatment strategies have been based on eliminating or suppressing inflammation and/or fibroproliferation. However, such therapeutic interventions have been ineffective.
Current concepts about the pathogenesis of IPF speculate that recurrent insults to the lung epithelium play a key role.11 Different strategies have not addressed possible etiologic and risk factors associated with IPF. Since > 90% of patients with IPF have increased acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER),12 we hypothesize that increased acid GER is an important risk factor for IPF development and/or progression. We describe the cases of four selected patients with IPF whose pulmonary function either stabilized or improved with adequate treatment for increased acid GER alone. Their course of IPF was influenced by their compliance with adequate treatment for increased acid GER alone.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
-interferon, etanercept, mycophenolate, imatinib, pirfenidone, pentoxifylline, infliximab, leflunomide, bosentan, and sildenafil);
Documentation of Acid GER and Treatment for Acid GER
The presence of increased acid GER was confirmed by ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH probe monitoring. A DeMeester score of > 14.72 was considered to be positive for increased acid GER (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 96%).14 All patients were prescribed daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (initial dose, 40 mg of omeprazole or its substitute 30 min before dinner) and were advised to follow conservative measures to decrease GER (ie, elevation of the head of the bed by placing 8-inch blocks on the floor, minimizing foods and beverages known to provoke acid GER, avoiding bedtime snacks, and lying supine for 3 to 4 h after a meal).
Follow-up
All patients were seen at baseline and during regular follow-up appointments at the UWMC, and all interim clinical events, if any, were reviewed with the patient and noted in clinic records. All PFTs and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring tests were performed at the UWMC.
Patients were followed up at regular intervals (ie, every 3 to 6 months during the first year, and, if stable, every 4 to 6 months during the second year, and every 6 to 12 months during the subsequent years). Spirometry and DLCO measurements (corrected for hemoglobin level) were routinely performed in accordance with ATS recommendations at intervals of 6 months.1516 Exercise testing was performed in accordance with the protocol followed at our center for similar patients. This included performing a 6-min walk test (6MWT) while breathing room air on a premeasured, designated, flat surface and continued exertion in patients demonstrating pulse oximetric saturation (SpO2) of >80% during the 6MWT by stair climbing (climbing consecutive steps as a continuum of the 6MWT) escorted by a designated respiratory therapist with continuous pulse oximetry monitoring. For patients demonstrating a resting SpO2 of < 88%, the 6MWT is performed using supplemental oxygen that was titrated to keep the SpO2 at > 80% during the 6MWT. For all patients with an SpO2 of > 88% while breathing air at rest, the 6MWT and exercise test is performed while breathing room air first and then with supplemental oxygen in patients demonstrating an SpO2 of
88% during the 6MWT.17 While the exercise test was performed during follow-up at variable intervals for all patients, only one patient had baseline exercise test data available to compare with the results of subsequent exercise tests during follow-up.
None of the patients underwent pulmonary rehabilitation during this period. Patients were considered to be stable, improved, or deteriorated based on the ATS international consensus statement on IPF.7
Case 1
IPF was diagnosed in a 68-year-old woman based on typical clinical features, nondiagnostic bronchoscopy findings (ie, using BAL and transbronchial lung biopsy), and high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan of the chest findings consistent with a UIP pattern.478 Baseline patient demographics and PFT results are summarized in Table 1
. The results of the patients 6MWT and exercise test results at baseline and during follow-up are shown in Table 2
. An esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy performed for long-standing symptoms of GERD revealed a hiatal hernia and grade 4 esophagitis with linear erosions and ulceration. She was started on home oxygen therapy for the noted hypoxemia and on daily PPI therapy (omeprazole, 40 mg) for GERD. Because of persistent symptoms of GERD, PPI therapy was maximized (omeprazole, 40 mg bid 30 min before meals). A 24-h esophageal pH probe study that was performed 6 weeks later revealed persistently increased acid GER despite receiving the maximum omeprazole dosage during the 24-h pH probe test (DeMeester score, 76.5; normal score, < 14.72).14
|
|
|
She was followed regularly over the next 5.5 years while still receiving daily PPI therapy alone, and her PFT results remained unchanged from baseline. A repeat chest HRCT scan revealed no progression when compared to the baseline chest HRCT scan findings. However, she complained of an increase in cough. In view of the downward trend in DLCO at 5.5 years (Fig 1, top middle, b) as well as symptoms of cough despite daily PPI therapy, she was prescribed twice-daily therapy with PPIs. Her cough subsided, and 1 year later (6.5 years after presentation) she remained stable (Fig 1, top middle, b).
Case 3
The patient was a 69-year-old woman in whom definite IPF with exertional dyspnea was diagnosed, with chest HRCT scan findings consistent with the UIP pattern as well as SLB findings with lung histology revealing UIP. Baseline patient demographics and initial PFT results are summarized in Table 1. A 24-h esophageal pH probe test revealed increased acid GER (DeMeester score, 32.7) despite the patient being asymptomatic for GER. She elected to undergo sole therapy for acid GER. A repeat 24-h esophageal pH probe test performed 6 weeks later while receiving PPI was negative (DeMeester score, 5.4). At the 2-year follow-up, the patient felt stable subjectively with PFT results showing stability (Fig 1, bottom, d).
Case 4
The patient was a 57-year-old woman in whom definite IPF was diagnosed based on a chest HRCT scan and an SLB showing the UIP pattern. Baseline patient demographics and initial PFT results are summarized in Table 1. Six months after diagnosis, she was noted to have had deteriorating PFT results (FVC, 2.27 [63% predicted]; DLCO, 15.0 mL/min/mm Hg [60% predicted]). She had symptomatic acid GER, and a 24-h esophageal pH probe test was positive (DeMeester score, 40.2; normal score, < 14.72). The patient began receiving daily PPI therapy (omeprazole, 40 mg).
One year later, she had worsening exertional dyspnea and persistent symptoms of GER; her PFT results showed a decline (Fig 1, bottom, d). When questioned about compliance with treatment for acid GER with PPIs, the patient admitted not being compliant with anti-acid GER therapy despite increased symptoms and objective deterioration. She refused to receive conventional treatment with combined prednisone and azathioprine as well as other treatment options including participating in clinical trials. Since her decline in PFTs coincided with her stopping the treatment for acid GER, she opted to resume and adhere to treatment for acid GER. During subsequent follow-ups, she became asymptomatic for GER and felt subjectively stable; PFT results showed stability. A repeat 24-h esophageal pH probe test while receiving PPI therapy was negative (DeMeester score, 9.1). At the last follow-up (2 years after presentation), she remained subjectively and objectively stable (Fig 1, bottom, d).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With increasing awareness of IPF as a predominantly fibrotic disease, treatment strategies have been based on eliminating or suppressing the inflammatory component and/or aborting the fibrotic component in the fibrotic lung. However, an effective treatment regime has yet to be determined. Acknowledging that the cause of IPF is yet to be identified and the nature of the apparent recurrent injury to the lung is unknown, treatment strategies have been unable to address the effect of decreasing or avoiding possible etiologic factors/risk factors that are associated with IPF. The international consensus statement on IPF7 lists GER as one of the five risk factors for IPF. In this regard, no study has been undertaken to explore the possibility of the treatment of IPF with the suppression of acid GER. Our case series of four patients is the first to document that the treatment of increased acid GER in IPF results in the stabilization or improvement of lung function (as measured by FVC and/or DLCO). We hypothesize that acid GER is an important factor for the development and/or progression of IPF. With the suppression of acid GER in these patients, we speculate that the lungs are given an opportunity to recover rather than progressing to fibrosis that is perpetuated by recurrent injury by acid by preventing recurrent and chronic microaspiration of acid droplets and by the consequent inflammation. The patients in cases 1 and 4 demonstrated an association between a trend toward deterioration and poor adherence to anti-acid GER treatment, stabilization on reinitiating treatment for acid GER, and the demonstration of the adequate suppression of acid GER by 24-h pH monitoring. The correlations of physiologic abnormality with acid GER were striking in case 1 as this patient required maximal medical and surgical treatment interventions that were guided by repeated 24-h pH monitoring testing for acid GER. It is also of interest that none of the patients manifested an acute exacerbation of IPF, needed hospitalization for respiratory problems, or received antibiotics during the follow-up period while receiving maintenance therapy with PPIs.
The long-term stabilization in both FVC and DLCO in these patients with new-onset IPF who received no other treatment other than that for increased acid GER is encouraging. In this regard, changes in the FVC and DLCO at 6 to 12 months after diagnosis has been associated with survival in patients with IPF.24 In addition, there was an improvement in oxygen saturation during the 6MWT and exercise test in case 1. The other three patients also demonstrated stability in oxygen saturation and walk distances during follow-up 6MWTs and exercise tests (data not shown as results from baseline walk tests within 2 to 3 months of the initiation of anti-acid GER therapy was not available in those patients). Since oxygen saturation during the 6MWT has been correlated with survival1725 and the deterioration of the patients condition during the first 2 to 3 years following the diagnosis of IPF is common, the response of these patients to the suppression of acid GER raises interesting questions about the pathogenesis and management of IPF.
The prevalence rates of IPF have been estimated to be 20.2 and 13.2 per 100,000, respectively, in men and women,26 whereas the rates of acid GER vary from 9 to 42% in the general population.27 Clearly, not all patients with increased acid GER develop lung fibrosis. We hypothesize that pulmonary fibrosis occurs only in individuals who are genetically susceptible to developing fibrosis from recurrent insults such as chronic acid GER and/or other unknown intrinsic or extrinsic factors. It is hoped that ongoing molecular genetic studies in patients with IPF and familial IPF will yield the needed insight into the genetic basis for the development of IPF and that this hypothesis can be tested in appropriate patient populations in the future.
Several questions about the relationship between IPF and acid GER and GERD need to be answered in future studies. Among them are the following: (1) the cause-effect relationship of the anatomical extent of acid GER and IPF needs to be clarified; (2) the efficacy of adequate treatment for acid GER in IPF patients; and (3) the role of overall gastric reflux (ie, acid, alkali, and gastric contents) in the context of the cause of IPF and acute exacerbations of IPF needs to be explored. Since the 24-h esophageal pH probe testing is the most sensitive in diagnosing acid GER14 and the vast majority of patients with IPF have no symptoms of acid GER,12 we routinely discuss the role of formal 24-h esophageal pH monitoring with our IPF patients28; the intensity, severity, and anatomic extent of increased acid GER detected by the 24-h pH probe testing will guide the optimal treatment for acid GER and may prevent other comorbid problems associated with acid GER, independent of IPF.
The limitations in the retrospective observations made in case reports/series are inevitable. Such case reports do not have control patients, and thus treatment recommendations and conclusions cannot be drawn from this report. Only a proper randomized controlled trial will ascertain the efficacy of the aggressive suppression of acid GER in IPF patients. The causality or pathophysiologic mechanisms of acid GER in IPF patients was not determined in this case series. Acknowledging these limitations, the results in these patients whose conditions may have otherwise deteriorated during the follow-up period of 2 to 6 years are informative and provocative. Given the lack of an effective treatment for IPF despite new interventions with antifibrotic agents having been tried,2930 we think that the design of future clinical trials in IPF patients should consider a treatment strategy using PPIs in prospective protocols.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication July 29, 2005. Accepted for publication October 7, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. L. Fimognari, R. Pastorelli, and G. Raghu Corticosteroids May Worsen Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1719 - 1720. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Kempainen, K. Savik, T. P. Whelan, J. M. Dunitz, C. S. Herrington, and J. L. Billings High Prevalence of Proximal and Distal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Advanced COPD Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1666 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-J. Koh, J. H. Lee, Y. S. Kwon, K. S. Lee, G. Y. Suh, M. P. Chung, H. Kim, and O. J. Kwon Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1825 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Singh, A. Fischer, R. Meehan, K. Brown, C. Feghali-Bostwick, and S. West Reflux and Autoimmunity: Common Links Among Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis? Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 940 - 941. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |