|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, India.
Correspondence to: Surinder K. Jindal, MD, FCCP, Professor & Head, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh-160012, India; e-mail: skjindal{at}indiachest.org
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To describe the experience of screening patients with asthma for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) presenting to a chest clinic. The clinical, serologic, radiologic, and treatment aspects including outcome of ABPA are also described.
Methods: All consecutive patients with asthma presenting to the chest clinic over a period of 2 years were screened with an Aspergillus skin test. Patients who were found to be positive were further investigated for ABPA. Patients were also arbitrarily classified as ABPA-seropositive (ABPA-S), ABPA with central bronchiectasis (ABPA-CB), and ABPA-CB with other radiologic findings (ABPA-CB-ORF) based on the high-resolution CT findings.
Results: Five hundred sixty-four patients were screened using an Aspergillus skin test; 223 patients (39.5%) were found to be positive, and ABPA was diagnosed in 126 patients (27.2%). There were 34 patients (27%) with ABPA-S, 42 patients with ABPA-CB, and 50 patients with ABPA-CB-ORF. Fifty-nine patients (46.8%) had received antitubercular therapy in the past. The vast majority of patients had bronchiectasis at presentation to our hospital. High-attenuation mucous impaction was noted in 21 patients (16.7%). There was no significant difference between the stages of ABPA and the duration of illness, the severity of asthma, and the serologic findings (ie, absolute eosinophil count, IgE levels [total] and IgE levels [for Aspergillus fumigatus]). The median duration of follow-up was 13 months (range, 9 to 38 months). All patients went into "remission" at 6 weeks. Twenty-five patients had a "relapse" during the course of their treatment. One hundred nine patients had "complete remission," 17 patients were classified as having "glucocorticoid-dependent ABPA," and 7 patients were classified as having "end-stage ABPA."
Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of ABPA in asthmatic patients presenting at our hospital. The disease entity is still underrecognized in India; the vast majority of patients have bronchiectasis at presentation, and almost half are initially misdiagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis. There is a need to redefine the definitions of ABPA and the optimal dose/duration of glucocorticoid therapy. This study reinforces the need for the routine screening of asthmatic patients with an Aspergillus skin test.
Key Words: allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis CT scan glucocorticoids outcome staging steroids
Aspergillus is a ubiquitous soil-dwelling organism. Because of its thermophilic nature, it has a propensity to cause a variety of clinical pulmonary syndromes (eg, invasive aspergillosis, aspergilloma, allergic rhinosinusitis and asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, chronic necrotizing aspergillosis, and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis [ABPA]). ABPA is a pulmonary disorder that is caused by hypersensitivity to Aspergillus fumigatus with resultant systemic immune activation, chronic asthma, recurrent pulmonary infiltrates, and bronchiectasis. First described by Hinson et al1 in 1952, this disease occurs in 1 to 2% of patients with persistent asthma and in 2 to 15% of patients with cystic fibrosis.2 In most cases, a lung biopsy is not required for diagnosis, and the diagnosis can be made on clinical, radiologic, and serologic grounds. Although the diagnostic criteria for ABPA have been laid down (and include bronchial asthma, immediate skin test reactivity to A fumigatus, elevated total serum Ig E level, pulmonary infiltrates, central bronchiectasis, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and positive serum precipitins [IgG] against Aspergillus antigen), none of these are specific for ABPA.3 There is still no consensus on the number of criteria needed for diagnosis, and patients in different stages of ABPA may not fulfill all these criteria.34
This disorder is not uncommon in India.5 We have previously reported our retrospective analysis of 35 cases of ABPA during the period 1986 to 1990,6 and another 89 cases during the period 1991 to 1998.4 However, the disease is still underdiagnosed in India, and as many as one third of the cases are initially misdiagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis.6 There is a need to diagnose ABPA early and treat it aggressively so as to prevent irreversible complications such as bronchiectasis and lung fibrosis. In this article, we describe our experience with screening patients with asthma presenting to a chest clinic for ABPA. The clinical, serologic, radiologic, and treatment aspects, including the outcome of ABPA, are also described.
Materials and Methods
We screened all consecutive patients with asthma presenting to the chest clinic over 2 years (ie, from January 2002 onward) with an Aspergillus skin test. Patients who had received glucocorticoids for > 3 weeks in the preceding 6 months were excluded from the study. Patients who were found to be positive for Aspergillus were further investigated. They were considered to have ABPA if they met four of the following criteria: clinical diagnosis of asthma; elevated total IgE level (ie, > 1,000 IU/mL); presence of specific IgE against A fumigatus detected (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; > 0.35 kU/L), serum precipitating antibodies against A fumigatus; radiographic pulmonary infiltrates (fixed/transient); and proximal or central bronchiectasis seen on high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan. A signed informed consent form was obtained from all patients as per protocol. None of the patients had been screened for cystic fibrosis.
The Aspergillus skin test was performed using A fumigatus antigen (Aspergillin; Hollister-Stier Laboratories; Spokane, WA). The test was read every 15 min for 1 h, and then after 6 to 8 h. For delayed-type reactions, the text was read after 24, 48, and 72 h. The reactions were classified as type I if a wheal and erythema developed within 1 min, reached a maximum after 10 to 20 min, and resolved within 1 to 2 h; a type III reaction was read after 6 h, and any amount of subcutaneous edema was considered to be a positive result; and a type IV reaction was read after 72 h, and an induration of > 5 mm was considered to be a positive result. A fumigatus precipitins were detected by the Ouchterlony gel diffusion techniques according to the method of Longbottom and Pepys.4 Levels of serum IgE (total) and IgE (for A fumigatus) were assayed with commercially available kits using the chemiluminescent enzyme assay (Diagnostic Products Corporation; Los Angeles, CA) and the fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (UniCap Systems; Pharmacia Upjohn; Stockholm, Sweden).
All patients underwent spirometry with bronchodilator reversibility (modal RS232; Morgan Scientific; Winchester, MA), and were categorized as mild, moderate, and severe obstructions as per the standardized practice in our laboratory.7 Bronchodilator reversibility was considered to be significant if, after inhaling 200 µg of salbutamol, the FEV1 and/or FVC increased by > 12% and 200 mL.8 Patients were also categorized as having mild, moderate, and severe asthma based on the Indian guidelines.9
An HRCT scan of the thorax was performed (LightSpeed Plus CT scanner; GE Medical Systems; Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) with a 512-matrix size. The scans (120 kV; 10 mA; window width, 1,500 Hounsfield units [HU]; and window level, 600 HU) were obtained with a scan time of 3 s with the patient in the supine position at full end-inspiration from lung apex to base with 1.25 mm contiguous slices using the high-spatial frequency algorithm. The scans were analyzed at the lobar level as well as the segmental level. Individual bronchopulmonary segments were identified by the anatomic division of the appropriate lobar bronchus, and its relationship with the major and minor fissures.10 All scans were assessed for radiologic abnormalities and were categorized as follows: (1) the presence or absence of bronchiectasis was noted, and the criteria described by Reiff et al11 was used to classify bronchiectasis; it was deemed to be "central" when confined to the medial half of the lung, at a point midway between the hilum and the chest wall; (2) the presence of parenchymal abnormalities, which included the presence of centrilobular nodules and tree-in-bud appearance, consolidation, parenchymal scarring, bullae, atelectasis, and pneumothorax. The criteria used to define these appearances were described by Webb et al12; and (3) the presence or absence of high-attenuation mucus (defined as a mucous plug that is visually denser than normal skeletal muscle).13
Patients at the time of diagnosis were classified based on the HRCT findings1415 as follows: (1) ABPA-seropositive (ABPA-S), those with ABPA who had normal HRCT findings; (2) ABPA with central bronchiectasis (ABPA-CB), those who had central bronchiectasis with no other manifestation described; and (3) ABPA-CB with other radiologic features (ABPA-CB-ORF) such as centrilobular nodules, tree-in-bud appearance, parenchymal scarring, bullae, atelectasis, and pneumothorax. The patients were treated with glucocorticoids with the following regimen: prednisolone, 0.75 mg/kg for 6 weeks, 0.5 mg/kg for 6 weeks, then tapered by 5 mg every 6 weeks to continue for a total duration of at least 6 to 12 months. The patients were followed up with a medical history and physical examination, chest radiograph, and measurement of IgE levels (total) every 6 weeks. Patients were classified as follows:
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software package (SPSS for Microsoft Windows, package version 10; SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL). The data are presented in a descriptive fashion as the mean (SD) or the median (range). Categoric variables were compared using the
2 test, while continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as applicable. Statistical significance was assumed at a p value of < 0.05.
Results
During the study period, 564 patients were screened for ABPA using the Aspergillus skin test; 223 patients (39.5%) were found to be positive, and ABPA was diagnosed in 126 patients (27.2%). There were 64 male patients and 62 female patients, with a mean age of 34.4 years (SD, 12.7 years). The baseline characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1 . The recognition of ABPA was generally delayed, and 59 patients (46.8%) had received antitubercular therapy in the past (median, one course of therapy; range, one to three courses). Chest radiographs showed fleeting pulmonary shadows in 46 patients (36.5%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
Despite the description of ABPA in India as early as 1971,16 this disease entity is still underrecognized,46 and this study highlights its continued underrecognition. This series, which represents one of the largest reported experiences of managing patients with ABPA, showed a prevalence rate of 27.2% in the population screened. This high rate does not reflect the prevalence in the general community but probably represents referral bias to pulmonary medicine specialists. In fact, in one study17 the prevalence of ABPA was found to be as high as 25 to 40% in an asthma clinic. Almost half of the patients (46.8%) had been misdiagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis, and they had been treated with antitubercular therapy before a diagnosis of ABPA could be made. Thus, even though pulmonary tuberculosis is common in India, other diagnostic possibilities should also be considered in patients with respiratory symptoms.
An HRCT scan is presently the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of bronchiectasis in patients with ABPA.18 The characteristic radiologic findings described for ABPA in the literature were also seen in this study.18192021 However, we did not find any evidence of pleural involvement as reported in different studies,2021 although secondary spontaneous pneumothorax requiring treatment with chemical pleurodesis did develop in four of our patients. In this study, most of the patients had fairly advanced bronchiectasis, and seven patients also were found to have cor pulmonale and type 2 respiratory failure. Central bronchiectasis (ie, bronchiectasis confined to the medial half of the lung) with normal peripheral bronchi is a characteristic feature of ABPA; this was seen in approximately 60% of patients in the present study, but almost 40% of patients had peripheral lung involvement. In another study, almost 30% of the patients had peripheral lung involvement.21 This implies that there is a need to exclude ABPA even in patients without central bronchiectasis. Also, HRCT scanning has limited value in distinguishing between idiopathic and specific types of bronchiectasis22 unless there are specific findings. In this context, high-attenuation mucus, which is the most characteristic (if not pathognomonic) finding of ABPA, was seen in almost 17% of the patients. This finding has been reported13 to occur in as high as 28% of patients, but that study had only 14 patients. The term high attenuation mucus is applied if the plug is visually denser than the normal skeletal muscle or if the mucous plug density measurements are of 72 to 102 HU.13 The hyperdense mucous plugging seen on CT scans is thought to be attributable to contained calcium salts, metals (the ions of iron and manganese), and/or hemorrhagic products,1323 and has a basis that is similar to that seen in patients with fungal sinusitis.24
Over the past few years, ABPA has been arbitrarily classified into ABPA-S; ABPA-CB; and ABPA-CB-ORF based on the radiologic findings, with both the severity of the radiologic and serologic findings increasing from patients with ABPA-S to those with ABPA-CB-ORF; however, this study had only six patients in each group.14 Previously, Patterson et al15 have divided ABPA into two stages (ABPA-S and ABPA-CB), with ABPA-S representing patients with ABPA without pulmonary damage. Greenberger et al25 found that the antibody levels and concentrations were higher in patients with ABPA-CB than in those with ABPA-S and concluded that ABPA-S represents the earliest stage or apparently a less aggressive form of ABPA. We found no difference between the radiologic staging of ABPA and the duration of illness, the severity of asthma, and the serologic findings. Thus, it may not be important to stage ABPA into categories, but it remains prudent to diagnose and treat ABPA early before bronchiectasis, which is irreversible lung damage, sets in.
Oral glucocorticoids are currently the drug treatment of choice for ABPA as they suppress both immune function and inflammation.2627 However, there have been no well-defined trials of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with ABPA, with different doses of glucocorticoids used in different studies and reviews (ie, from 0.5 mg/kg/d for 14 days, then on alternate days for 3 months, and discontinue152628 to 0.75 mg/kg/d for 4 weeks, taper, and stop over 5 to 6 months27), and such therapy is associated with frequent relapses or corticosteroid dependence (45%).1528 In our study, the dose of glucocorticoids used and the duration of therapy were generally more than previously recommended, but the remission rates were also higher, and the prevalence of glucocorticoid-dependent ABPA was only 13.5%. This raises the possibility of a higher dose and longer duration for corticosteroid therapy being associated with better outcomes; however, further randomized controlled studies are required to settle this issue. Antifungal agents, especially itraconazole, have been suggested to modify the immunologic activation associated with ABPA and to improve clinical outcome.2930 We were not able to use it widely because of the expensive nature of the drug; however, in the limited numbers of patients in whom we used the drug, there was no observable advantage.
Finally, there is a need to redefine certain definitions of ABPA. For example, there are differences in definitions used in this study vis-à-vis the definitions used in the literature. Remission has been defined as the absence of pulmonary infiltrates for 6 months after therapy with oral steroids has been discontinued.15 However, we have mainly used the serologic criteria for defining relapse and remission, especially in light of the fact that serologic changes predate pulmonary damage. The relapse of patients with ABPA has been variably defined as a doubling of the baseline IgE levels with clinical symptoms or radiologic worsening1527 or without them.26 In our study, we defined relapse as a doubling of serum IgE levels with or without worsening of symptoms or chest radiograph findings. In fact, 25 patients fulfilled the serologic criteria for relapse, but only 8 patients had radiologic infiltrates. Similarly, it does not clinically matter if therapy with glucocorticoids is continually required for the control of asthma or ABPA; hence, we grouped both of these entities together. Also, there is no well-accepted definition of end-stage ABPA; it has been defined variably based on the symptoms, the severity of pulmonary function abnormalities, and the extent of pulmonary fibrosis.3132 We defined end-stage ABPA as occurring in a patient who had either pulmonary hypertension or type 2 respiratory failure.
Conclusions
This study indicates a high proportion of ABPA in the population attending the chest clinic of this hospital, and thus active screening with an Aspergillus skin test is advocated for all asthmatic patients. There is a need for better recognition of ABPA as the disease entity is still underrecognized in India, with the majority of patients presenting with features of permanent lung damage, and almost half initially misdiagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis.
The currently used staging system, based on HRCT criteria, and the definitions of ABPA need further clarification. However, it is important to diagnose the disease early and to treat it aggressively so as to prevent the stage of central bronchiectasis. Finally, there is a need to conduct randomized trials to adequately define the optimal dose and duration of steroid therapy for patients with ABPA.
|
Abbreviations: ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; ABPA-CB = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with central bronchiectasis; ABPA-CB-ORF = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with central bronchiectasis with other radiologic features; ABPA-S = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis seropositive; HRCT = high-resolution CT; HU = Hounsfield units
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest related to this paper.
Received for publication November 30, 2005. Accepted for publication February 2, 2006.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Agarwal, D. Gupta, A. N. Aggarwal, A. K. Saxena, A. Chakrabarti, and S. K. Jindal Clinical Significance of Hyperattenuating Mucoid Impaction in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis: An Analysis of 155 Patients Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1183 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |