|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* From the University of Vermont College of Medicine (Dr. Dixon), Burlington, VT; Center for American Indian Health Research (Dr. Yeh), College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Strong Heart Study (Dr. Welty), Missouri Breaks Research, Timber Lake, SD; College of Public Health (Dr. Rhoades), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; Center for American Indian Health Research (Dr. Lee), College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; MedStar Research Institute (Dr. Howard), Hyattsville, MD; and University of Arizona (Dr. Enright), Tuscon, AZ.
Correspondence to: Anne E. Dixon, MD, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Patrick 204, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401; e-mail: anne.dixon{at}vtmednet.org
Abstract
Background: Despite growing recognition that asthma is an important cause of morbidity among American Indians, there has been no systematic study of this disease in older adults who are likely to be at high risk of complications related to asthma. Characterization of the impact of asthma among American Indian adults is necessary in order to design appropriate clinical and preventive measures.
Methods: A sample of participants in the third examination of the Strong Heart Study, a multicenter, population-based, prospective study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians, completed a standardized respiratory questionnaire, performed spirometry, and underwent allergen skin testing. Participants were
50 years old.
Results: Of 3,197 participants in the third examination, 6.3% had physician-diagnosed asthma and 4.3% had probable asthma. Women had a higher prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma than men (8.2% vs 3.2%). Of the 435 participants reported in the asthma substudy, morbidity related to asthma was high: among those with physician-diagnosed asthma: 97% reported trouble breathing and 52% had severe persistent disease. The mean FEV1 in those with physician-diagnosed asthma was 61.3% of predicted, and 67.2% reported a history of emergency department visits and/or hospitalizations in the last year, yet only 3% were receiving regular inhaled corticosteroids.
Conclusions: The prevalence of asthma among older American Indians residing in three separate geographic areas of the United States was similar to rates in other ethnic groups. Asthma was associated with low lung function, significant morbidity and health-care utilization, yet medications for pulmonary disease were underutilized by this population.
Key Words: American Indian Arizona asthma epidemiology Native American North Dakota Oklahoma South Dakota spirometry
American Indians have increased morbidity and mortality related to diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer.123 Less is known about morbidity and mortality related to respiratory diseases. Asthma and chronic respiratory symptoms are significant causes of morbidity in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Canadian First Nation children.456 In adults, Canadian Aboriginals had increased asthma morbidity (emergency department and office visits) compared to non-Aboriginals.7 However, Singleton et al8 recently reported that asthma hospitalizations were slightly lower for American Indians compared with the general US population.
In the general population, there is a growing awareness that the elderly have significant morbidity related to asthma9; among adults, asthma hospitalization rates are highest in the elderly.8 Asthma has not previously been studied in elderly American Indians despite the fact that this population may have unique socioeconomic and cultural factors affecting the care of their asthma.10
To determine if asthma is a significant problem in older American Indians, and to investigate whether American Indians have adequate management of their disease, we studied the impact of asthma in a cohort of older American Indians; the participants were a subset of a those taking part in a longitudinal cohort study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians, the Strong Heart Study (SHS).
Materials and Methods
Recruitment
The SHS is a multicenter, population-based, prospective study of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors among American Indian adults who are members of the Pima/Maricopa and Papago tribes of central Arizona, seven tribes in southwestern Oklahoma (living near Anandarko, Lawton, and Carnegie), and selected Nakota and Lakota tribes in North Dakota and South Dakota (near Fort Totten, Pine Ridge, and Eagle Butte).11 This substudy was performed during the third examination of the SHS between 1996 and 1999.3 Participants were
50 years old during the third examination. Details of eligibility and enrollment have been published elsewhere.3 The research protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at each center and the appropriate Indian Health Service, and by the 13 participating tribes. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Participants were eligible for the asthma substudy if they reported any of the following: asthma, attacks of wheezing with shortness of breath, diagnosis of asthma since the second examination, shortness of breath with wheezing at night, attacks of wheezing with shortness of breath during the last 12 months, or use of any asthma inhalers during the last 12 months. The procedures described below were performed only on participants in this substudy.
Interview
The interview included a subset of questions from the standardized American Thoracic Society-Division of Lung Diseases and International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease questionnaires.12 Participants were asked about comorbidities, health-care utilization, and pulmonary medications received during the previous 12 months. Use of medication was ascertained from patient self-report.
Spirometry
Spirometry was performed by centrally trained and certified nurses and technicians.1314 Normal reference values are those for the SHS population.13
Allergen Skin Testing
Skin-prick testing followed standardized techniques for epidemiologic studies.15 Antigens included three grasses, four weeds, four trees, four molds, two mites, cat, dog, cockroach, horse, and cattle. Participants were considered atopic if the panel was valid and any of the allergen results were positive (size of wheal 3 mm larger than negative glycerin control at 15 min).
Definitions
Participants with a > 20 pack-year smoking history or congestive heart failure (ejection fraction on echocardiogram < 40% or history of congestive heart failure if an echocardiogram was not available) were excluded from the asthma categories. Cases were categorized as "physician diagnosed," "probable," "former," or "no" asthma according to the algorithm in Figure 1
.
|
Statistical Analysis
2 tests were used to examine the associations of asthma status (none, former, probable, and physician diagnosed) with a number of categorical variables; exact corrections were used for cells with fewer than five observations. These categorical variables included demographic characteristics, asthma symptoms, severity indicators, and medication use. Associations of asthma status with continuous variables were assessed using analysis of variance methods. We performed univariate and multiple regression analysis to determine factors that were associated with low lung function and health-care utilization. Factors considered for inclusion in the models included smoking (pack-year and current), gender, body mass index, diabetes, poverty, hay fever, sinusitis, and asthma medications. Given the overall low lung function in this population, we defined low lung function as FEV1 < 60% of predicted for the purposes of these analyses. All analyses were performed using statistical software (SAS version 8.0; SAS Institute; Cary, NC).
Results
Characteristics of Participants in the Third Examination of the SHS
A total of 3,197 participants took part in the third examination: 6.3% had physician-diagnosed asthma, and 4% had probable asthma. The prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma and probable asthma in the third examination was higher in women than men (8.2% of women vs 3.2% of men for physician-diagnosed asthma and 5.2% vs 2.9% for probable asthma). Selected characteristics of the entire cohort are shown in Table 1.
|
Respiratory Symptoms in the Asthma Substudy
Morbidity related to breathing problems was high: 97% of those with physician-diagnosed asthma and 83% with probable asthma reported difficulty breathing (Table 2
). Of those participants with physician-diagnosed disease, 72% reported that their breathing was worse during a particular season. Participants with physician-diagnosed asthma reported very high prevalence of shortness of breath with physical activity and being woken by breathing difficulties.
|
|
|
|
Pulmonary Medication
Daily use of controller medication among participants with physician-diagnosed asthma was low, with only 3% receiving daily inhaled corticosteroids; 58% were receiving short-acting ß-agonists on a scheduled or as-needed basis. Asthma medication usage was also low in those with probable asthma (Table 6
).
|
|
|
This study shows that asthma is a common, often severe problem among older American Indian adults. Asthma causes marked morbidity in terms of symptoms and health-care utilization, yet use of controller medications was uncommon.
Historically, a low prevalence of asthma was reported in the American Indian population; rather respiratory infections, such as pneumonia and tuberculosis, were a more significant source of morbidity and mortality.171819 More recently, asthma prevalence was reported to be similar in Alaska Natives and non-Native Medicaid recipients < 20 years old, but there are few data addressing prevalence of asthma in older adults in the lower 48 states.6 The 6% prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma is slightly higher than that reported for the US population as a whole > 50 years old.2021 However underdiagnosis of asthma in our study may have been significant; 4% of participants of participants in the third examination of the SHS had probable but previously undiagnosed asthma. Gessner and Neeno6 also reported underdiagnosis of asthma in the Alaska Native population, as areas with resident pediatricians and previous participation in asthma research reported a fivefold to 11-fold higher prevalence of asthma than other areas. Underdiagnosis of asthma is an important issue that also has been identified in other populations of older non-American Indian adults: a previous US study22 found 4% of the elderly population had undiagnosed asthma.
Participants in this study had fairly severe disease. Certainly our inclusion criteria would have selected symptomatic individuals, but the data still point to substantial morbidity related to asthma. When we applied asthma severity criteria to those with "former" asthma, we found they had significant disease, suggesting they may still have significant asthma-related morbidity. Studies of asthma in older populations have reported similar findings: a cross-sectional study23 in Baltimore reported that two thirds of their population had severe or moderate persistent disease, and the Cardiovascular Health Study22 found that 58% of their population with asthma had severe or moderate persistent disease.
The mean FEV1 in those with physician-diagnosed asthma was only 61% of predicted; low FEV1 has been reported for similar age groups with asthma.222425 Participants with former asthma had low lung function measured by FEV1; this may reflect loss of lung function with long-standing disease.26 Atopy and hypertension were associated with low lung function in this population. Atopy has also been associated with accelerated loss of lung function in other populations.27 Low lung function has previously been associated with hypertension28; in fact, low FVC has been reported as a risk factor for the development of hypertension.29
Participants had severe disease as measured by health care utilization. Another recent study found that asthma-related hospitalizations for American Indians were slightly lower than that for the general population8; Singleton et al8 reported higher hospitalization rates in the Southwest compared with the Northern Plains and Oklahoma regions. This contrasts with our findings in which participants from Arizona reported fewer emergency department visits, fewer PCP visits, and similar rates of hospitalization/emergency department visits. Singleton et al8 determined hospitalization rates from an Indian Health Service inpatient data set; the higher rates of utilization in our study may represent differences between self-report and diagnostic coding, which may also differ in different regions. Not all participants responded to our question regarding emergency department visits or PCP visits, and so it is possible we are slightly overestimating per patient visits in our population; nevertheless, there appears to be substantial morbidity related to asthma in a large number of individuals. Other studies in similar populations, such as the Aboriginal population in Canada, have shown a similar high rate of health-care utilization in terms of emergency department visits; in fact, health-care utilization for emergency department visits was higher for Aboriginals than it was for a matched non-Aboriginal low-income population.7 We found that poverty and hypertension were associated with decreased emergency department visits/hospitalizations; this was unexpected and will require further study. Asthma medication use was associated with increased emergency department visits/hospitalizations; we speculate that while patients are using rescue inhalers for their symptoms, their asthma could be better managed with the use of more controller medication.
The infrequent use of controller medication was noteworthy. We do not have information regarding prescriptions or pharmacy records to confirm our observations. This study was not designed to evaluate the level of health care for American Indians with asthma and do not permit firm conclusions relating to its overall management among this population moreover, the study was performed between 1996 and 1999, and may not reflect current practice. The data are self-reported, specific locus of care was not obtained, and patient compliance was not evaluated, but our finding of under utilization of controller therapy is comparable to reports in other populations which have found that only a minority of patients hospitalized for asthma exacerbations subsequently receive inhaled corticosteroids.303132 In our study, the majority of participants (58%) were receiving inhaled rescue therapy. However, the low self-reported use of controller medications suggests that further examination of the management of asthma among older American Indians would provide valuable information relating to optimum regimens, including various barriers to care. Increasing the use of inhaled corticosteroids in this population could have a significant impact on morbidity; in a study6 of Alaska Native children, yearly hospitalization risk decreased (from 9.3 to 6.8%; p = 0.02) with increased use of inhaled corticosteroids.
There are limitations to the data presented. Our data pertain only to an elderly population; however, the elderly represent an increasing proportion of the asthmatic population, which have been poorly studied in the past.30 Participants were eligible for this study if they had respiratory symptoms, and so the burden of respiratory symptoms reported in our "no asthma" group may reflect other respiratory diseases (although COPD should not be significant because we excluded participants with a > 20 pack-year smoking history). This was not a population control group; however, this design allowed us to separate risk factors that were specifically associated with asthma, as opposed to nonasthmatic pulmonary processes. Another potential limitation is that we did not have equal representation by gender. This may reflect the fact it was not a random sample, but participants were selected to have asthma and respiratory symptoms, and asthma is known to more common in adult women than men.33 All interviews were conducted in English; in the experience of the SHS, language has not been an issue, even in this elderly population.
In summary, the present study describes the prevalence, epidemiology, and major clinical manifestations of self-reported asthma among a large group of older American Indians residing in three separate locations. Our data suggest that further delineation of asthma and related conditions among older American Indians, along with attention to clinical management, are warranted.
Acknowledgements
Research specialist Pam Boyer-Pfersdorf wrote the manuals of operation, purchased the supplies, taught the nurses and technicians, and reviewed the quality of spirometry and allergen skin tests. We also thank the SHS technicians and nurses for enthusiastically working with the study participants, including Dr. Tauqeer Ali, Betty Jarvis, Martha Stoddart, Beverly Price, and Marcia OLeary. We appreciate the Indian Health Service for the use of their clinics, and the wonderful support and cooperation of the following Indian tribes and communities: Ak-Chin Papago/Pima, Apache, Caddo, Cheyenne River Sioux, Comanche, DE, Spirit Lake, Fort Sill Apache, Gila River and Salt River Pima/Maricopa, Kiowa, Oglala Sioux, and Wichita. We also thank Charles G. Irvin, PhD, for his helpful comments.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: PCP = primary care provider; SHS = Strong Heart Study
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Indian Health Service.
Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts U01-HL41642, HL41652, and HL41654, and grant K23 RR019965.
The authors have no financial or other potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received for publication August 8, 2006. Accepted for publication January 31, 2007.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |