|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Epidemiology/Biostatistics Division (Drs. Persky, Turyk, and Eldeirawi, Ms. Piorkowski, Ms. Wagner, Ms. Hernandez, and Ms. Fitzpatrick), University of Illinois School of Public Health, Chicago, IL; Safer Pest Control Project (Mr. Knight), Chicago, IL; and Pediatric Management Services (Ms. Coover), Highland, IN.
Correspondence to: Victoria Persky, MD, Epidemiology/Biostatistics Division, University of Illinois School of Public Health, 1603 Taylor St, Room 878a, Chicago, IL 60612; e-mail: vwpersky{at}uic.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: asthma Chicago collaboration community community health educators environment intervention stress
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asthma is a complex disease with environmental, psychosocial, and biological components. Factors contributing to asthma symptoms include exposure to air pollutants, pets, dampness, molds, cigarette smoke, infections, indoor and outdoor allergens, poor housing conditions, acute and chronic stress, and lack of appropriate medical care.89101112131415161718
| Environmental Exposures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Within Chicago, in a study of baseline data from a small intervention trial with 62 inner-city families with asthma, we found that 34% had pets and 42% had smokers in the home. Eighty percent of the homes had cockroach allergen > 8 U/g.24 In a 1994-to-1995 survey of 2,145 Catholic school adolescents, there was a large variation among racial and ethnic groups in reported exposure to asthma triggers (Table 1 ). Overall, 54% report home exposure to furry pets, 18% to cockroaches, 18% to rodents, 23% to dampness, and 56% to smoking. Use of inhalants was common, with 13 to 24% smoking cigarettes and up to 23% in some groups reporting use of another inhalant (correction fluid, glue, gasoline, paint) in the last year. Within this population of mixed socioeconomic backgrounds, exposure to individual triggers was not always consistent. At home, cockroaches and rodents tended to be higher in nonwhite children, pets were more common among whites, and exposure to dampness, mold, and passive smoke was relatively high for all subgroups studied.
|
Among 290 low-income, predominantly Hispanic women participating in another study in Chicago, visual inspection of the homes similarly revealed high a prevalence of problems, with 53% having mold or moisture, 31% with cockroaches, 20% with rodents, 33% with pets, and 44% with smokers in the home. Infestation was significantly related to poor housing conditions, such as having holes in the wall, leaks, peeling plaster, and mold (Table 2 ). The stage of migration was also related to selected exposures, with women born in the mainland United States having greater exposure to passive smoke and pets and lower exposure to mold and moisture than women born elsewhere (Fig 1 ).
|
|
Overall, our Chicago studies highlight the high levels of exposures to environmental triggers and to stressful events for all groups. The large variation in exposures among different communities, however, underscores the need for interventions tailored to the individual needs of the community served.
| Intervention Trials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addressing the large number of issues facing inner-city families—heavy exposure to environmental triggers, high prevalence of stressful events, and inadequate access to appropriate health care—it is important to identify and address individual needs of each community. Thus, even if single allergen exposure such as mite allergens were reduced, it is possible that high levels of other exacerbants would render the single interventions ineffective. Previous intervention trials3132 designed to decrease asthma severity in underserved populations have tended to rely on professional case management focused on multifaceted interventions. The strongest results seen so far were in the National Cooperative Inner-city Asthma Study,33 in which 515 children age 5 to 11 years in active case management by masters-level social workers reported significantly less symptom days in the previous 2 weeks than the control group (3.51 days vs 4.06 days). Recently, the Inner-city Asthma Study (a follow-up to the National Cooperative Inner-city Asthma Study) achieved significant decreases in allergen levels and symptoms with aggressive management, including donation of high-efficiency particulate air vacuum cleaners and air purifiers.34 The above results suggest that modification of the home environment through professional intervention may be effective in reducing asthma morbidity. Case management by professionals, however, is often expensive, inconsistently received by low-income groups, and not always transferable in a mobile population.
There is increasing focus on the importance of community health educators in identifying and addressing asthma-related issues. Community health educators have worked in a variety of settings addressing a large number of health problems.35 The issues in asthma are complex and may require lower cost interventions tailored to the unique needs of the selected community.3637 The most comprehensive study to date was recently reported by Krieger et al,38 who conducted a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up among 274 low-income households containing children aged 4 to 12 years with asthma. Community health workers provided in-home environmental assessment, education, support for behavior change, and resources. Participants were assigned to either a high-intensity group receiving seven visits or a low-intensity group receiving a single visit and more limited resources. The high-intensity group improved more significantly in quality of life and asthma-related urgent health services use. Asthma symptom days declined more in the high-intensity group, although differences across groups did not reach statistical significance. The authors estimated that the 4-year net cost savings were $189 to $721 in the high-intensity group. Several other ongoing trials are evaluating the effect of community-health educators on asthma severity, although results from most of these are not yet available.
| Community-Level Interventions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The evolution of coalitions within the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute had a somewhat different course. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program began in 1989 to develop and apply appropriate guidelines for asthma detection and management. In the course of implementing the program, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program recognized the importance of working at the local level through community asthma coalitions.40 In 1988, they identified 44 such coalitions, mostly with
25 voluntary members without paid staff. In general, these voluntary coalitions have proved extremely useful for communication and network development.
An alternative approach is to fund large focused efforts aimed at populations rather than individuals. Three large sets of multifaceted interventions are currently in progress. The first initiative, Allies Against Asthma, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, includes coalitions in seven cities: Allies Against Pediatric Asthma in Puerto Rico; Consortium for Infant and Child Health in Hampton Roads, VA; the DC Asthma Coalition; Fight Asthma Milwaukee Allies; The King County Asthma Forum in Washington; The Long Beach Alliance for Children With Asthma in California; and The Philadelphia Allies Against Asthma Coalition. The second initiative, Controlling Asthma in American Cities, is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and includes coalitions in Philadelphia, New York City, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Richmond, Berkeley, and Chicago. The third initiative, funded by the Merck Childhood Asthma Network, includes coalitions from Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Puerto Rico. In all of these programs, coalitions of community organizations, academics, schools, and/or health-care providers are working to establish better linkages among institutions and individuals caring for children with asthma. Each group is approaching the problem somewhat differently, but activities include provider education, increased public awareness, training of community health educators, integration of institutional infrastructures, development of educational materials, enhanced community-wide education, and enhanced referral systems. Evaluation of the programs will be complex. Appropriate controls for community-level interventions are not clear, especially at a time when measures of asthma severity such as hospitalization rates are changing throughout the country. The benefits of increased education and improving linkages among large institutions caring for children with asthma may not be obvious for several years. Separating effects of individual and joint interventions will provide additional challenges. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the problem and the complexity of issues facing low-income communities demand that we expand our approaches to deal with asthma in a cohesive and innovative manner. The evolution of the Community Asthma Prevention Program (CAPP) in Chicago highlights some of the issues facing our cities and the importance of community-driven projects in addressing those issues.
| The Chicago CAPP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Central to the program is the work of community health educators. Community health educators have unique skills in identifying issues within families, working with them to overcome barriers and build on strengths within the community, finding local resources, obtaining cooperation and acceptance from the family, and working with other groups in building more cohesive infrastructures and changing policies at the local and state level. Our community health-educator program, in addition, enhances skills and job opportunities for the educators themselves. Several of the educators have moved on to more advanced health-care positions. As a direct result of our program, we have worked with other groups in Chicago to establish a degree program within Daley College that allows community health educators to take courses toward a certificate that can be applied to college credit in a flexible and community- oriented approach.
Our programs require an extensive infrastructure for training, supervision, and continued staff development. The initial training involves 1 to 2 weeks of half-day sessions. These sessions are also open at times to other community members and have served to increase general asthma knowledge in the area. Over the years, we have trained hundreds of residents in these sessions, residents who in turn return to their communities with increased understanding of the disease. After the initial training, in part based on the skills and performance of the participants as well as references and previous experience, and in part on availability of funding, we hire educators for the specific projects. We feel that it is important that the educators, when at all possible, come from and live in the communities being served. Training focused on the needs of the project then continues for the duration: initially in project-related sessions, then usually weekly meetings with supervisors from their agencies, and enhanced by less frequent meetings with project directors, nurses, physicians, and social service support. This intense infrastructure we feel is important because of the complexity of issues that arise, especially during home visits with families under stress from a variety of sources.
The community health educators provide education programs in the community, at health fairs, and at clinical and social service sites. They also work with families in a series of home visits designed to increase asthma knowledge and to identify and modify asthma triggers. General intervention strategies include dust control; decreased exposure to pets; frequent washing of bedding in hot water; elimination of carpets, if possible; decreasing humidity and molds; removal of feather pillows and stuffed toys; covering mattresses and upholstered furniture; use of integrated pest management for pest control; and decreasing exposure to active smoke and passive smoke. Follow-up visits review and reinforce education and assist families in overcoming barriers to change. Throughout our programs, we emphasize low-cost realistic recommendations that can be transported by families when they move. Key to these programs has been the development of culturally sensitive, age-appropriate educational material. Our group, in collaboration with Chicago Public School nurses and the Chicago Asthma Consortium, developed asthma manuals for all principals and nurses within the Chicago Public Schools, as well as educational brochures in Spanish and English that were distributed to 80,000 families. In addition, with funding from the Otho S.A. Sprague Institute, we developed a series of educational asthma games in Spanish and English for children and adults for use in group settings, such as clinic waiting rooms, health fairs, and parent workshops.
Initially, our program was based at a community health center and Head Start programs in Chicago. Over time, however, we realized the importance of incorporating other agencies, schools, and health centers. This in part evolved from a need for stable and diverse infrastructures—not amenable to perturbations in funding—and in part from a need to establish more coherent linkages among institutions serving the children. When we began working with the schools, for instance, the need for appropriate health-care referrals for students with both established and newly recognized asthma became apparent. We were fortunate to collaborate with the Mobile C.A.R.E. Foundation that now has asthma physicians and staff in three vans providing free asthma care to students in 48 schools in the city. Over the last few years, we have screened approximately 50,000 students in the public and Catholic schools. The 15% of children with diagnosed asthma and an equal number of others with symptoms who desire further evaluation are referred to Mobile C.A.R.E. Foundation vans. We have worked with programs within the public schools (Parents as Teachers First, and subsequently the Early Childhood Program) to train educators within the schools to educate families and children with asthma.
Several years ago, in response to concerns of public housing residents, we screened residents of public housing developments on the south side of Chicago for asthma prevalence and for factors in the homes that could be exacerbating the disease. Subsequently, The Safer Pest Control Project, in collaboration with our group and many of our partners, obtained NIEHS funding for randomized controlled trial of 145 families in which community health educators work with public housing residents on modification of the home environment of families with asthma. As an outgrowth of that project, and again in response to community concerns, Dr. Samuel Dorevitch at University of Illinois at Chicago obtained an NIEHS K08 Training Award to examine the effects of public housing demolitions on particulates and respiratory function.
An important series of questions that still remain relate to the primary prevention of asthma in children at risk for the disease. In the Peer Education in Pregnancy Study, we are working with 351 families recruited when women at risk for having children with asthma were pregnant. This project is a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of aggressive modification of the home environment in pregnancy and early in life on the subsequent development of asthma. Baseline data from that study has shown a high prevalence of asthma triggers in the home as well as psychosocial and medical issues needing to be addressed. In 1-year alone, 130 referrals were made for dental and health-care providers, mental health counseling, legal assistance, help obtaining employment, transportation, food assistance, housing, furniture, finding child care, help with parenting, domestic violence, and car seats.
Recently, the necessity for more coherent integration of institutions serving children with asthma has become clear. With funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Merck Childhood Asthma Network, we are participating in two large collective efforts aimed at reducing asthma morbidity. For the first initiative, we are targeting children in an area of the city containing one of six of Chicago Public Schools. This is a collaboration of the Chicago Public Schools; the Chicago Housing Authority; local and state public health departments; the University of Illinois at Chicago; the University of Chicago; the Chicago Asthma Consortium; the American Lung Association Metropolitan Chicago; community groups such as the Grand Boulevard Federation and Health Care Alternatives Systems; and local hospitals and health-care providers, such as Mobile C.A.R.E. Foundation and Access Community Health Network. As part of this effort, we are screening children in schools in the targeted area, and linking them with health-care providers, social services, and community educators hired at four sites. We are training school nurses and health-care providers and working with the American Lung Association Metropolitan Chicago to establish asthma training programs for families and staff within the schools. The second initiative is similar. It targets a smaller African-American, inner-city community on the south side of Chicago with similar multifaceted interventions. The ultimate goal of these programs is to institutionalize coordinated systems able to identify and serve children and their families in a more cohesive and comprehensive fashion.
As these programs have evolved, it has become obvious that barriers exist to asthma management that cannot be addressed within existing structures without major policy change. Collaborations within Chicago have been effective in altering state and local school medication policies so that children with documented asthma can carry their inhalers. Integrated pest management is now mandatory in all Illinois schools and Chicago Public Housing and is included on all Chicago Public Schools contracts for pest control. Demolition procedures for Chicago Public Housing buildings have been changed to minimize dust and rodent exposure. There are, however, many issues remaining to be addressed. Elimination of indoor exposures to asthma triggers requires better understanding of renovation, construction, and maintenance of healthy homes and schools, enforcement of appropriate building codes, and examination of policies regarding inspection and enforcement of subsidized housing in the inner city. Similarly, decreasing outdoor exposure to pollution requires changes in regulations for diesel fuel and power plant emissions currently undergoing review at the local and national levels. In addition, systems need to be established for the identification and remediation of acute events that have the potential of affecting asthma, such as the current renovation of the Dan Ryan Expressway in Chicago.
Community involvement has been key to all aspects of our activities in Chicago. It is the concern of the community that first alerted us to problems with the medication policy in schools, access to spacers and inhalers, environmental problems in public housing, demolition procedures, and impact of the Dan Ryan Expressway renovation. It is through community action that appropriate committees and task forces have been developed to address these problems, and it is through the continued work of our community health educators that issues in individual homes are identified and addressed, and that culturally specific educational programs have evolved.
| Future Directions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This work was supported by the Otho S.A. Sprague Memorial Institute, the Illinois Department of Human Services, the Merck Childhood Asthma Network, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grants R21 ES08716, R01ES011377, K08ES11302, R25 ES11077), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U59/CCU523265).
Statements in this document reflect opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received for publication December 20, 2006. Accepted for publication August 2, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Clancy, J. P. Kiley, and K. B. Weiss Eliminating Asthma Disparities Through Multistakeholder Partnerships Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1422 - 1424. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |