This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: chest.07-0062v1 chest.07-0062v2 132/2/471    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, R. Articles by Holland, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walker, R. Articles by Holland, A. E.

Reproducibility of the Negative Expiratory Pressure Technique in COPD^*

^* From the School of Physiotherapy (Ms. Walker and Dr. Holland), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; and the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care (Dr. Paratz), University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Correspondence to: Anne E. Holland, PhD, La Trobe University, Physiotherapy Department, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 3068; e-mail: a.holland{at}alfred.org.au

Abstract

Background: Tidal expiratory flow limitation (EFL) contributes to chronic dyspnea and exercise intolerance in COPD patients. It can be assessed with the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique and is expressed as either the percentage of the tidal volume over which EFL occurs (EFL%VT) or according to more detailed three-point or five-point scoring systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the NEP technique in COPD patients.

Methods: Tidal EFL was evaluated with NEP in 18 subjects with stable COPD (FEV₁ range, 18 to 75% predicted) on two occasions (mean retest interval, 8.2 days) by the same rater. Agreement between testing occasions was assessed with the statistic for the 3-point and 5-point EFL scores, and with the coefficient of repeatability for EFL%VT.

Results: On the first testing occasion, nine subjects had no EFL, four subjects had EFL in the supine position, and five subjects had EFL in the sitting and the supine position. Using the 3-point score, agreement was present in 14 of 18 subjects at time 2 ( = 0.66), indicating substantial agreement. Using the 5-point score, agreement was seen in 13 of 18 subjects ( = 0.61), also indicating substantial agreement. The reproducibility of EFL%VT measurements was lower than that required to reliably detect clinical change in both the sitting and supine positions (coefficient of repeatability, 37% and 58%, respectively).

Conclusions: The 3-point and 5-point scores provide a reproducible assessment of EFL in COPD patients. The classification of EFL as a percentage of tidal volume is less reproducible, and large changes are required to be confident that real clinical change has occurred.

Key Words: COPD • reproducibility of results • respiratory function tests