HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: chest.06-2140v1 chest.06-2140v2 132/3/884    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fritz, G. K. Articles by Mansell, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fritz, G. K. Articles by Mansell, A.

Symptom Perception in Pediatric Asthma: Resistive Loading and In Vivo Assessment Compared

Gregory K. Fritz, M.D^*; Sue K. Adams, M.A^*; Elizabeth L. McQuaid, Ph.D^*; Robert Klein, M.D; Sheryl Kopel, MSc^*; Jack Nassau, Ph.D^* and Anthony Mansell, M.D

^*Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Brown University School of Medicine

Gfritz{at}lifespan.org

Abstract

BackgroundInaccurate symptom perception contributes to asthma morbidity and mortality in both children and adults. Various methods have been used to quantify perceptual accuracy, including psychophysical (resistive loading) approaches, ratings of dyspnea during induced bronchoconstriction, and in vivo monitoring, but it is unclear whether the different methods identify the same individuals as good or poor perceivers. Objectives of the study were 1) to compare in the same asthmatic children two methods of quantifying perceptual ability: threshold detection of added resistive loads and in vivo symptom perception, and 2) to determine which method best predicts asthma morbidity. Methods: 78 asthmatic children 7 -- 16 years of age completed two threshold detection protocols in the laboratory and recorded their subjective estimates of lung function prior to spirometry at home twice daily for 5 -- 6 weeks. Summary measures from both methods were compared to each other and to asthma morbidity (as measured with the Rosier Asthma Functional Severity Scale). Results: Symptom perception ability, as summarized by either method, varied greatly from child to child. Neither of the resistive load detection thresholds were significantly related to any of the three in vivo perception scores, nor were they related to asthma morbidity. The three in vivo scores did show a significant or marginal relationship with morbidity (p< .01; p< .06; p< .07). Conclusions: Resistive loading techniques may not be useful in assessing symptom perception ability in children. Measuring estimates of symptoms in relation to naturally occurring asthma can identify children at risk for greater asthma morbidity.

Key Words: asthma • pediatric • dyspnea