Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
First published online on June 15, 2007
Chest, doi:10.1378/chest.06-2325
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
chest.06-2325v1
132/2/617    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coxson, H. O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coxson, H. O

The Effects of Radiation Dose and Computed Tomography Manufacturer on Measurements of Lung Densitometry

Ren Yuan, MD1,2; John R Mayo, MD2; James C Hogg, MD, PhD1; Peter D Paré, MD1; Annette M McWilliams, MD3; Stephen Lam, MD3 and Harvey O Coxson, PhD1,2

1James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St. Paul's Hospital 2Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital 3British Columbia Cancer Agency; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

harvey.coxson{at}vch.ca

Abstract

BackgroundTo evaluate the effect of radiation dose and scanner manufacturer on quantitative CT measurements of lung morphology in smokers.

MethodsLow and high dose inspiratory multi-slice CT scans were obtained in 50 subjects at an approximate six-month interval (0.5 ± 0.2 years). In another 30 subjects, multi-slice CT scans were acquired first using a GE LightSpeed Ultra followed 1.2 ± 0.4 years later by a Siemens Sensation 16 scanner. Custom software was used to measure lung volume, mass, mean density, and the extent of emphysema using threshold cut-offs of -950 -910, and -856 HU and the lowest 15th and 5th percentile points.

ResultsThe change in x-ray dose significantly affected measurements of emphysema assessed using mean lung density, threshold or percentile methods. There were also interactions between dose and total lung volume for all the measurements except the -950 HU threshold and lowest 5th percentile point. These two emphysema measurements suggest that there is more emphysema in the CT scans obtained using a lower x-ray dose. Only the mean lung density and -856 HU threshold showed significant effects between CT scanner manufacturer and interactions between total lung volume and scanner. All other measures of lung structure were not different between the two CT scanners.

ConclusionCT measurements of very low density lung structures are significantly affected by radiation dose, but less sensitive to the lung volume. Image acquisition parameters including radiation dose and scanner type, and the subject's breath size should be standardized to estimate emphysema severity in longitudinal studies.

Key Words: Emphysema • Computed tomography • Radiation dose • Lung expansion







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.