Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
First published online on March 30, 2007
Chest, doi:10.1378/chest.06-3016
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
chest.06-3016v1
131/6/1800    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eberhardt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eberhardt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, A.

Electromagnetic Navigation Diagnostic Bronchoscopy in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Ralf Eberhardt, MD1; Devanand Anantham, MRCP2; Felix Herth, MD1; David Feller-Kopman, MD2 and Armin Ernst, MD2

1Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Germany 2Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

aernst{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Abstract

BackgroundElectromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB) with biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance has enhanced the yield of flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. However, the accuracy of ENB navigation suggests that the addition of fluoroscopy is redundant.

ObjectivesData was prospectively collected to determine the yield of ENB without fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions.

MethodENB was performed via flexible bronchoscopy using the superDimension/Bronchus system. Biopsies were taken through the extended working channel after navigation. Fluoroscopy was not utilized, but post transbronchial biopsy chest x-rays were done to exclude pneumothorax. The primary endpoint was diagnostic yield and the secondary endpoints were navigation accuracy, procedure duration and safety. Analysis by lobar distribution was also done to assess the performance in different lobes of the lung.

ResultsNinety-two peripheral lung lesions were biopsied in the 89 subjects. The diagnostic yield of ENB was 67%, which was independent of lesion size. Total procedure time ranged from 16.3 to 45.0 minutes with a mean of 26.9 ± 6.5 minutes. The mean navigation error was 9 ± 6 mm; range 1 to 31. There were two incidences of pneumothorax for which no intervention was required. When analyzed by lobar distribution, there was a trend towards a higher ENB yield in diagnosing lesions in the right middle lobe (88%).

ConclusionsENB can be used as a stand-alone bronchoscopic technique without compromising diagnostic yield or increasing pneumothorax risk. This may result in sizable timesaving and avoids radiation exposure.

Key Words: Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy • Peripheral lung lesion • Solitary pulmonary nodule • Transbronchial lung biopsy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Makris and K. I. Gourgoulianis
Electromagnetic Navigation Diagnostic Bronchoscopy and Transbronchial Biopsy
Chest, March 1, 2008; 133(3): 829 - 830.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.