<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org">
<title>Chest recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org</link>
<description>Chest RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Chest</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0012-3692</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/476?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/479?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/539?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/574?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/601?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/637?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/640?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/661?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/668?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/669?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/674?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/225?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/226?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/229?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/324?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/332?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/375?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/394?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/417?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/425?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/438?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/465-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/467?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/469-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/471-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/473?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Chest</title>
<url>http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Light at the End of the Tunnel of Inflammation in Obstructive Airway Diseases?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Light at the End of the Tunnel of Inflammation in Obstructive Airway Diseases?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>476</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/476?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are You Fluent in the Language of Dyspnea?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/476?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahler, D. A., Baird, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are You Fluent in the Language of Dyspnea?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>477</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>476</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time To Start Comparing Apples With Apples]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernst, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time To Start Comparing Apples With Apples]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/479?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Measurements of Membrane Diffusing Capacity and Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/479?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crapo, R. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1390</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Measurements of Membrane Diffusing Capacity and Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>479</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement--A Timely Update]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan-Yeung, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement--A Timely Update]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>481</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogers, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tc2 Response at the Onset of COPD Exacerbations]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>T lymphocytes and especially the subpopulations of CD8+ cells are believed to have a key role in COPD pathophysiology, but there are only few data regarding the role of these cells in COPD exacerbation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Aim:</I></st>
<p>We aimed to study prospectively changes of CD8+ T-lymphocyte subpopulations in the sputum of COPD patients at the onset of mild exacerbations and at a stable condition in order to provide further insight in the pathophysiology of the disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Induced-sputum samples were collected from 24 COPD patients with median age of 52 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44 to 58 years) and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> percentage of predicted of 78.05% (IQR, 75.8 to 80.1%) at the onset of mild exacerbations not requiring hospitalization and when stable. Inflammatory cells and T-lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+, CD8+, and cells producing interferon [IFN]- or interleukin [IL]-4) were measured using flow cytometry and immunocytochemical methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>A significant increase in sputum CD8+ T lymphocytes (p &lt; 0.0001) and significant decreases in CD4+ T lymphocytes as well as in CD4+/CD8+ (p = 0.0001) and CD8+IFN-+/CD8+IL-4+ (p = 0.001), CD4+IFN-+/CD4+IL-4+ (p = 0.0003) sputum cells ratios were found decreased at the onset of exacerbations compared to stable condition. The changes in T-lymphocyte subpopulations were not associated with smoking history, demographic characteristics, or disease severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>The findings of the present study suggest that CD8+ lymphocytes are increased and potentially polarized toward a Tc2 profile in the airways of COPD patients at the onset of COPD exacerbations with respect to stable condition. The clinical impact of the observed phenomenon requires further investigation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makris, D., Lazarou, S., Alexandrakis, M., Kourelis, T. V., Tzanakis, N., Kyriakou, D., Gourgoulianis, K. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tc2 Response at the Onset of COPD Exacerbations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>488</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Language of Breathlessness Differentiates Between Patients With COPD and Age-Matched Adults]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>If descriptors of the sensation of breathlessness are able to differentiate between medical conditions, the language of breathlessness could potentially have a role in differential diagnosis. This study investigated whether the language used to describe the sensation of breathlessness accurately categorized older individuals with and without a prior diagnosis of COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Using a parallel-group design, participants with and without a prior diagnosis of COPD volunteered words and phrases and endorsed up to three statements to describe their sensation of breathlessness. Cluster analysis (v-fold cross-validation) was applied, and subjects were clustered by their choice of words. Cluster membership was then compared to original group membership (COPD vs non-COPD), and predictive power was assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Groups were similar for age and gender (COPD, n = 94; 48 men; mean age, 70 &plusmn; 10 years [&plusmn; SD]; vs non-COPD, n = 55; 21 men; mean age, 69 &plusmn; 13 years) but differed significantly in breathlessness-related impairment, intensity, and quality of life (p &lt; 0.0001). Cluster membership corresponded accurately with original group classifications (volunteered, 85%; and up to three statements, 68% agreement). Classification based on a single best descriptor (volunteered [62%] or endorsed [55%]) was less accurate for group membership.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Language used to describe the sensation of breathlessness differentiated people with and without a prior diagnosis of COPD when descriptors were not limited to a single best word or statement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, M., Cafarella, P., Olds, T., Petkov, J., Frith, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Language of Breathlessness Differentiates Between Patients With COPD and Age-Matched Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>496</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuous Oxygen Use in Nonhypoxemic Emphysema Patients Identifies a High-Risk Subset of Patients: Retrospective Analysis of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Continuous oxygen therapy is not recommended for emphysema patients who are not hypoxemic at rest, although it is often prescribed. Little is known regarding the clinical characteristics and survival of nonhypoxemic emphysema patients using continuous oxygen. Analysis of data from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) offers insight into this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics of 1,215 participants of NETT, stratifying by resting PaO<SUB>2</SUB> and reported oxygen use. Eight-year survival was evaluated in individuals randomized to medical therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>At enrollment, 33.8% (n = 260) of participants nonhypoxemic at rest reported continuous oxygen use. When compared to nonhypoxemic individuals not using oxygen (n = 226), those using continuous oxygen had worse dyspnea, lower quality of life, more frequent exercise desaturation, and higher case-fatality rate. After adjusting for age, body mass index, and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> percentage of predicted, the presence of exercise desaturation accounted for the differential mortality seen between these groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>In the NETT, the use of continuous oxygen in resting nonhypoxemic emphysema patients was associated with worse disease severity and survival. The differential survival observed could nearly all be accounted for by the higher prevalence of exercise desaturation in those using continuous oxygen, suggesting that it is not a harmful effect of oxygen therapy contributing to mortality. It remains unclear whether continuous oxygen therapy improves survival in normoxic patients with exercise desaturation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Trial registration:</I></st>
<p>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000606.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drummond, M. B., Blackford, A. L., Benditt, J. O., Make, B. J., Sciurba, F. C., McCormack, M. C., Martinez, F. J., Fessler, H. E., Fishman, A. P., Wise, R. A., for the NETT Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuous Oxygen Use in Nonhypoxemic Emphysema Patients Identifies a High-Risk Subset of Patients: Retrospective Analysis of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>506</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/507?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Randomized Trial of CT Fluoroscopic-Guided Bronchoscopy vs Conventional Bronchoscopy in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/507?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Prior case series have shown promising diagnostic sensitivity for CT scan-guided bronchoscopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>This was a prospective randomized trial comparing CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. All procedures were performed using a protocolized number of passes for forceps, transbronchial needles, and brushes. Cytologists and pathologists were blinded as to bronchoscopy type. Patients with negative results underwent open surgical biopsy (for nodules or lymph nodes) or were observed for &ge; 2 years if they had a nodule &lt; 1 cm in size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Fifty patients were enrolled into the study (CT scan-guided bronchoscopy, 26 patients; conventional bronchoscopy, 24 patients). Two patients, one from each arm, dropped out of the study. Ultimately, 36 patients were proven to have cancer, and 27 of these patients (75%) had their diagnosis made by bronchoscopy. The sensitivity for malignancy of CT scan-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions was similar (71% vs 76%, respectively; p = 1.0). The sensitivity for malignancy of CT guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy for mediastinal lymph nodes was higher (100% vs 67%, respectively) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.26). On a per-lymph-node basis, there was a trend toward higher diagnostic accuracy with CT scan guidance (p = 0.09). The diagnostic yield was higher in larger lesions (p = 0.004) and when CT scanning confirmed target entry (p = 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>We failed to demonstrate a significant difference between CT scan-guided bronchoscopy and conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Further study of improved steering methods combined with CT scan guidance for the diagnosis of lung cancer in peripheral lesions is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ost, D., Shah, R., Anasco, E., Lusardi, L., Doyle, J., Austin, C., Fein, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Randomized Trial of CT Fluoroscopic-Guided Bronchoscopy vs Conventional Bronchoscopy in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>513</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>507</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Risk-Adjusted Morbidity and Mortality Outcome Analysis After Therapeutic Bronchoscopic Procedures: Results of a Multi-institutional Outcomes Database]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Introduction:</I></st>
<p>Interest in databases is growing to allow for outcomes research, assess health-care quality, and determine best practices and resource allocation, and they are increasingly considered as a tool to potentially tie reimbursement to outcome parameters. Little is known about resource use and risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality after therapeutic bronchoscopic interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Data were extracted and reviewed from an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional outcomes database for therapeutic bronchoscopic interventions. All consecutive patients are entered into this database, and information on demographics, indications, procedures and anesthesia, comorbidities and general health status, urgency of intervention, morbidity and mortality to 30 days, increase in levels of care, and procedural resources is documented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>From December 2005 to May 2007, 554 therapeutic procedures were performed in four hospitals. Most procedures were done under general anesthesia (n = 362) and rigid bronchoscopy (n = 483), and the most common intervention was airway stent placement (n = 258). Forty-two percent of procedures were done urgently or emergently. Complications were common (19.8%), and 30-day mortality was 7.8%, correlating with underlying health status and urgency of intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Discussion:</I></st>
<p>Prospective and ongoing data analysis for bronchoscopic procedures is feasible and valuable. Risk-adjusted and disease-specific outcomes can be documented and potentially used for quality assessment, benchmarking, and quality improvement initiatives. Appropriate use of resources and effect of interventions can be documented. Extending the number of participating centers as well as inclusion of quality of life tools and technical success are the next steps.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernst, A., Simoff, M., Ost, D., Goldman, Y., Herth, F. J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0580</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Risk-Adjusted Morbidity and Mortality Outcome Analysis After Therapeutic Bronchoscopic Procedures: Results of a Multi-institutional Outcomes Database]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Cancer and Prolonged ICU Length of Stay]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Data on patients with cancer who have a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the ICU are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes of cancer patients with life-threatening complications with an ICU stay &ge; 21 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>A cohort study performed at a 10-bed oncology medical-surgical ICU from May 2000 to December 2005. Prolonged ICU LOS was defined as an ICU stay &ge; 21 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>During the period, 1,090 patients were admitted to the ICU and 163 patients (15%) had a prolonged ICU LOS. These patients, however, accounted for 48% (5,828/12,224) of the total ICU bed-days. The hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 50% and 60%, respectively, and similar to patients with ICU LOS &lt; 21 days (51% and 61%, respectively). ICU-acquired events and complications were common, and the most frequent were infections (90%), mechanical ventilation (99%), and need for vasopressors (88%). The number of organ failures, older age, and poor performance status were the main outcome predictors. The median long-term follow-up after hospital discharge was 537 days (range, 193 to 1,119 days), and 29 patients (18%) were alive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Fifteen percent of critically ill patients with cancer had a prolonged ICU LOS. Short- and long-term survival rates were reasonable, and the prognosis was better than expected <I>a priori</I>. In our opinion, the length of ICU admission <I>per se</I> should not be used in the clinical decisions regarding the continuation of treatment in these patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soares, M., Salluh, J. I. F., Torres, V. B. L., Leal, J. V. R., Spector, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0359</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Cancer and Prolonged ICU Length of Stay]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Traditional Reading of the Bedside Chest Radiograph Appropriate To Detect Intraatrial Central Venous Catheter Position?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Traditionally, the positioning of central venous catheters (CVCs) outside the right atrium (RA) in patients receiving intensive care is determined by surrogate landmarks on bedside chest radiographs (CXRs). The validity of this method was examined by comparing readings of radiologists with the results of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Prospective study at university hospital. Two hundred thirteen adults scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery were randomized to right or left internal jugular vein catheterization under ECG guidance. One senior radiologist and two radiologists in training independently read the CXRs, and determined whether the CVC tip ended in the RA and measured the vertical distance from the CVC tip to the carina (TC-distance).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Two hundred twelve CVC tips could be identified by TEE. Only left-sided CVCs (n = 5) ended in the upper RA (2.4%). Three of those patients were shorter than 160 cm. Specificity was 94% for senior radiologist, 44% for the first radiologist in training, and 60% for the second radiologist in training. The TC-distance of intraatrial catheters was 39, 55, 59, 80, and 83 mm, respectively. Thus, a TC-distance &le; 55 mm ensured extraatrial tip position in four of five intraatrial CVCs (80%, p = 0.002). The TC-distance of extraatrial catheters ranged from &ndash; 26 to 102 mm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Reading of a bedside CXR alone is not very accurate to identify intraatrial CVC tip position. TC-distance is a helpful marker, and its specificity is as good as that of an experienced radiologist if a cutoff value of 55 mm is chosen.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wirsing, M., Schummer, C., Neumann, R., Steenbeck, J., Schmidt, P., Schummer, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2687</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Traditional Reading of the Bedside Chest Radiograph Appropriate To Detect Intraatrial Central Venous Catheter Position?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>533</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/534?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary vs Nonpulmonary Sepsis and Mortality in Acute Lung Injury]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/534?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Acute lung injury (ALI) is a frequent complication of sepsis. It is unclear if a pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis affects mortality in patients with sepsis-induced ALI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Two hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients with sepsis-induced ALI from 14 ICUs at four hospitals in Baltimore, MD were prospectively classified as having a pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the independent association of a pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis with inpatient mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>In an unadjusted analysis, in-hospital mortality was lower for pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis (42% vs 66%, p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with pulmonary sepsis had lower acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, shorter ICU stays prior to the development of ALI, and higher lung injury scores. In the adjusted analysis, several factors were predictive of mortality: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.06), Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30), ICU length of stay prior to ALI diagnosis (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.39), APACHE II score (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.12), lung injury score (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.43), SOFA score (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.26), and cumulative fluid balance in the first 7 days after ALI diagnosis (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.10). A pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis was not independently associated with mortality (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.35).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Although lower mortality was observed for ALI patients with a pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis, this finding is likely due to a lower severity of illness in those with pulmonary sepsis. Pulmonary vs nonpulmonary source of sepsis was not independently predictive of mortality for patients with ALI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Trial registration:</I></st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00300248.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevransky, J. E., Martin, G. S., Mendez-Tellez, P., Shanholtz, C., Brower, R., Pronovost, P. J., Needham, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0309</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary vs Nonpulmonary Sepsis and Mortality in Acute Lung Injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>538</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>534</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/539?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Morbidly Obese Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/539?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Conflicting data exist regarding the effects of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) on cardiorespiratory fitness in morbidly obese individuals with normal resting left ventricular function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Ninety-two morbidly obese subjects without any prior diagnosis of OSAS underwent cardiorespiratory fitness testing, two-dimensional echocardiography, and overnight polysomnography. Using the results of the polysomnogram, comparisons were made between subjects with (n = 42) and without (n = 50) OSAS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Mean body mass index (BMI) for the study population (n = 92) was 48.6 &plusmn; 9.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (&plusmn; SD); mean age was 45.5 &plusmn; 9.8 years, and approximately 69% were female. Despite having a higher resting, exercise, and resting mean arterial pressures, the OSAS cohort had a maximum oxygen consumption that was lower than the cohort without OSAS (21.1 mL/kg/min vs 17.6 mL/kg/min; p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in BMI, age, gender, waist circumference, and neck circumference between those with and without OSAS. Differences were observed between the cohorts in systolic BP, diastolic BP, and heart rate during rest, exercise, and recovery periods. There was no difference in ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, and treadmill test duration between cohorts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Morbidly obese individuals with OSAS demonstrate reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and differing hemodynamic responses to exercise testing as compared with their counterparts without this disorder. These data suggest chronic sympathetic nervous system activation negatively influences aerobic capacity in OSAS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanhecke, T. E., Franklin, B. A., Zalesin, K. C., Sangal, R. B., deJong, A. T., Agrawal, V., McCullough, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0567</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Morbidly Obese Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SLEEP MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Inhaled Corticosteroid Use, Cardiovascular Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality in Asthmatic Women]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) decreases the risk of asthma exacerbations. Recent studies have suggested that ICS therapy also may decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease, and perhaps of all-cause mortality. We examined this hypothesis in a large, well-characterized cohort of asthmatic women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>In 1976, the Nurses' Health Study enrolled 121,700 registered nurses, who were 30 to 55 years of age. Participants were asked about "physician-diagnosed asthma" on biennial questionnaires. In 1998, asthmatic participants were sent a supplementary questionnaire on asthma diagnosis and management, including ICS use. Mortality was assessed through 2003, without knowledge of the 1998 (baseline) ICS status. The odds ratios (ORs) for death were adjusted for age, asthma severity, smoking, heart disease, cancer, stroke, aspirin, and statin use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Among 2,671 eligible women (<I>ie</I>, those who responded to the 1998 supplement [85%], met criteria for persistent asthma, and had not received a prior diagnosis of COPD), 54% reported ICS use. Over the next 5 years, 87 women (3.3%) died (cardiovascular deaths, 22; cancer deaths, 31; other, 34 [including 4 from asthma]). Compared to asthmatic women who did not use ICSs, those receiving therapy with ICSs had lower all-cause mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.92). ICS users were at significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.93), but not of death from cancer (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.38) or other causes (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.27).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>ICS use was associated with significantly lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in women with asthma. These observational data suggest that ICSs may indeed have antiinflammatory benefits beyond the airway, which is a possibility that merits further study.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camargo, C. A., Barr, R. G., Chen, R., Speizer, F. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Inhaled Corticosteroid Use, Cardiovascular Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality in Asthmatic Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ASTHMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exercise-Induced Asthma May Be Associated With Diminished Sweat Secretion Rates in Humans]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Muscarinic receptor agonists increase water secretion from the acinar cells of respiratory, sweat, salivary, and lacrimal glands. Mice lacking the gene for aqueous water channel aquaporin (Aqp) 5 exhibit methacholine-induced bronchiolar hyperreactivity when compared to normal mice. Individuals with asthma also have enhanced airway responsiveness to methacholine and diminished airway hydration. Because Aqp5 in humans is also expressed in respiratory, sweat, salivary, and lacrimal glands, we hypothesized that those individuals with exercise-induced asthma and excessive bronchiolar reactivity should also have decreased muscarinic receptor-dependent sweat, salivary, and tear gland secretions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Healthy, athletic subjects who are suspected of having exercise-induced bronchospasm were recruited, and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> values were determined following provocative airway challenges with methacholine. Measurements of pilocarpine-induced sweat secretion were taken in 56 volunteers, and some additional subjects also had timed collections of saliva and tear production.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Subjects manifesting excessive airway reactivity demonstrated by exaggerated methacholine-induced reductions in FEV<SUB>1</SUB> also had diminished values for pilocarpine-induced sweat secretion (n = 56; <I>r</I> = &ndash; 0.59; p &lt; 0.0001). The rate of pilocarpine-stimulated sweat secretion in our subjects correlated highly with salivary flow rate (<I>r</I> = 0.69; p &lt; 0.0001) and tearing rate (<I>r</I> = 0.86; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>Hyperhidrosis, sialorrhea, and excessive tearing are traits that may indicate a phenotype that predicts resistance to hyperactive airway diseases such as exercise-induced asthma in humans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, C., Stafford, C., Lockette, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0366</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exercise-Induced Asthma May Be Associated With Diminished Sweat Secretion Rates in Humans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>558</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ASTHMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased Major Bleeding Complications Related to Triple Antithrombotic Therapy Usage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Artery Stenting]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>The optimal antithrombotic therapy strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-S) is unknown. We assessed the safety of antithrombotic therapy strategies in AF patients with indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing PCI-S.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We studied consecutive AF patients with indication for OAC who underwent PCI-S. We compared patients that received triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) [aspirin, clopidogrel, and coumadin] against other regimes (non-TT) after PCI-S. The primary end point was defined as the occurrence of major bleeding complications that were termed as <I>early major bleeding</I> (EMB) [&le; 48 h] or <I>late major bleeding</I> (LMB) [&gt; 48 h]. Clinical follow-up was performed, and complications were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>We studied 104 patients (mean age &plusmn; SD, 72 &plusmn; 8 years; 70% men); TT was used in 51 patients (49%). TT was associated with a higher incidence of LMB (21.6% vs non-TT, 3.8%; p = 0.006) but not of EMB (5.8% vs non-TT, 11.3%; p = 0.33). In multivariate analyses, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (hazard ratio [HR], 13.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 108.3; p = 0.014) and PCI-S of three vessels or left main artery disease (HR, 7.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 39.2; p = 0.01) were independent predictors for EMB. TT use (HR, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 32.4; p = 0.012), the occurrence of EMB (HR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.8 to 25.3; p = 0.005), and baseline anemia (HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 12.5; p = 0.027) were independent predictors for LMB. No differences in major cardiovascular events were observed in patients treated with TT vs non-TT (25.5% vs 21.0%; p = 0.53).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>A high rate of major bleeding is observed in AF patients with indication for OAC undergoing PCI-S who receive TT. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use and multivessel/left main artery disease during PCI-S were independent predictors for EMB, while TT use, occurrence of EMB, and baseline anemia were independent predictors for LMB.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manzano-Fernandez, S., Pastor, F. J., Marin, F., Cambronero, F., Caro, C., Pascual-Figal, D. A., Garrido, I. P., Pinar, E., Valdes, M., Lip, G. Y. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0350</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased Major Bleeding Complications Related to Triple Antithrombotic Therapy Usage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Artery Stenting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>567</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>THROMBOSIS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Financial Impact of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction that increases patient morbidity and mortality. The financial impact of HIT to an institution is thought to be significant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of HIT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>A case-control study was employed. Case patients were identified as newly diagnosed HIT patients. Control subjects were matched by diagnosis-related group, primary diagnosis code, primary procedure code, and hospital admission date. The financial/decision support database of the hospital was queried to identify the matched control subjects, total cost, and reimbursement. The determination of financial impact included the total profit or (total loss) and the backfill effect (<I>ie</I>, the lost operating margin resulting from increased length of stay). Length of stay and mortality were compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Data from 22 case patients and 255 control subjects were analyzed. On average, HIT case patients incurred a financial loss of $14,387 per patient and an increase in length of stay of 14.5 days. When confining the analysis to only Medicare case patients (n = 17) and Medicare control subjects, case patients incurred a financial loss of $20,170 per case and an increase in length of stay of 15.8 days. Depending on the occupancy rate of the institution, additional financial loss could result from the backfill effect. Mortality was not significantly affected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>For an institution that sees 50 new cases of HIT per year, the projected annual financial impact ranges from approximately $700,000 to $1 million. Institutions with high bed occupancy rates may see an additional loss from the backfill effect.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smythe, M. A., Koerber, J. M., Fitzgerald, M., Mattson, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Financial Impact of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>573</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>THROMBOSIS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/574?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soluble CD40 Ligand, Platelet Surface CD40 Ligand, and Total Platelet CD40 Ligand in Atrial Fibrillation: Relationship to Soluble P-Selectin, Stroke Risk Factors, and Risk Factor Intervention]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/574?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Abnormal levels of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) have been reported in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and stroke, all of which are conditions that are associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized the following: (1) CD40 ligand (CD40L)-related indexes (<I>ie</I>, platelet surface expressed CD40L, the soluble fragment of CD40L [sCD40L], and the total amount of CD40L per platelet [pCD40L]) are elevated in patients with AF compared to control subjects; (2) these indexes correlate with soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), which is an established platelet marker; and (3) these indexes differentiate "high-risk" from "low-risk" subjects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We performed a case-control study of 121 AF patients, 71 "disease control subjects," and 56 "healthy control subjects." Peripheral venous levels of platelet surface-expressed CD40L were analyzed by flow cytometry, while levels of sCD40L, pCD40L, and sP-selectin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>AF patients had significantly higher sCD40L levels compared to healthy control subjects (p = 0.042), with no difference in platelet surface CD40L and pCD40L levels. A positive correlation was noted between levels of sCD40L and pCD40L, and not with sP-selectin. CD40L-related indexes failed to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk AF patients. AF patients receiving optimal antithrombotic therapy had significantly lower pCD40L levels (p &lt; 0.001) compared to control subjects. Optimized AF management also resulted in significant reductions in the levels of sCD40L (p = 0.023) and pCD40L (p &lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>CD40L-related indexes are not useful in the risk stratification of AF patients, and abnormal sCD40L levels can be reduced by intense multifactorial risk management. While there is a significant, albeit modest, excess of platelet activation in AF patients (as measured by sCD40L levels) compared to healthy control subjects, this is not in excess of that seen in patients with underlying cardiovascular diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choudhury, A., Chung, I., Panja, N., Patel, J., Lip, G. Y. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2745</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soluble CD40 Ligand, Platelet Surface CD40 Ligand, and Total Platelet CD40 Ligand in Atrial Fibrillation: Relationship to Soluble P-Selectin, Stroke Risk Factors, and Risk Factor Intervention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>574</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>THROMBOSIS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surfactant Protein D and Bronchial Dysplasia in Smokers at High Risk of Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Surfactant dysfunction has been implicated in both lung cancer and COPD. This study evaluated the relationship between surfactant protein D (SP-D) and the progression of bronchial dysplasia in heavy smokers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>SP-D and oxidized glutathione levels were determined in samples of BAL fluid from 71 ex-smokers and current heavy smokers who participated in a lung cancer chemoprevention study with inhaled budesonide therapy. Bronchoscopy with biopsies was performed at baseline and was repeated at 6 months. The primary end point was the progression of bronchial dysplasia over 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Log-normalized SP-D levels in BAL fluid were significantly associated with the progression of bronchial dysplasia. A 1-U decrease in log-normalized SP-D levels at baseline was associated with a 3.2-fold increase (95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 8.26) in the risk for progression. Reduced FEV<SUB>1</SUB> also predicted the progression of bronchial dysplasia (p &lt; 0.05). Additional reductions in BAL fluid SP-D levels over the 6 months further increased the risk of progression (odds ratio, 1.76 for a 1-U decrease in log-normalized SP-D levels in BAL fluid; p = 0.023). Thirty-seven percent of the variation in SP-D levels in BAL fluid was related positively to the subject's FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC ratio, and inversely to their plasma C-reactive protein levels and number of pack-years of smoking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>Reduced SP-D expression in BAL fluid was associated with the progression of bronchial dysplasia. SP-D levels in BAL fluid may serve as a potential biomarker to identify smokers who are at risk of early lung cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sin, D. D., Man, S. F. P., McWilliams, A., Lam, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0600</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surfactant Protein D and Bronchial Dysplasia in Smokers at High Risk of Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LUNG CANCER</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unexpected Pulmonary Involvement in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the utility of sputum examinations and chest radiographs (CXRs) in patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis (XPTB) to detect pulmonary involvement of tuberculosis (TB).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We studied 72 XPTB patients who were managed through the TB Program, King County, WA, from January 2003 through November 2004.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>The two most common sites of XPTB were the lymph nodes (36 [50%]) and pleura (12 [17%]). Thirty-five of 72 XPTB patients (49%) had abnormal CXR findings. Sputum was not obtained from 15 patients despite sputum induction. Of the 57 patients from whom sputum was collected, 30 (53%) had abnormal CXR findings, 5 (9%) had sputum smears that were positive for acid-fast bacilli, and 12 (21%) had sputum cultures that were positive for <I>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</I>. Weight loss was significantly associated with positive sputum culture findings in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 18.72; p = 0.049). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of positive sputum culture results between patients with abnormal CXR findings and those with normal CXR findings (7 of 30 patients [23%] vs 5 of 27 patients [19%], respectively; p = 0.656). Of 24 HIV-negative XPTB patients with normal CXR findings, 2 patients (8%) had positive sputum culture findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>CXR results did not reliably differentiate XPTB patients with and without positive sputum culture findings. Some XPTB patients had positive sputum culture results despite normal CXR findings and negative HIV status. Weight loss in XPTB patients was associated with positive sputum culture results. Sputum examinations in XPTB patients, regardless of the CXR results, may identify potentially infectious cases of TB.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parimon, T., Spitters, C. E., Muangman, N., Euathrongchit, J., Oren, E., Narita, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0319</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unexpected Pulmonary Involvement in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INFECTION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/595?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pneumonia: Criteria for Patient Instability on Hospital Discharge]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/595?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>A study was undertaken to identify and weigh at the time of hospital discharge simple clinical variables that could predict short-term outcomes in patients with pneumonia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>In a prospective observational cohort study of 870 patients discharged alive after hospitalization for pneumonia, we collected oxygenation and vital signs on discharge and assessed mortality and readmission within 30 days. From the &beta;-parameter obtained in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, a score was assigned to each predictive variable. The effects of instability at discharge on outcomes within 30 days thereafter were examined by adjusted models with use of the pneumonia severity index at hospital admission, the length of stay, the Charlson comorbidity index, or the preillness functional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Four variables related to a 30-day mortality rate from all causes were identified in the multivariate model; these included one major criterion (temperature &gt;37.5&deg;C) and three minor criteria (systolic BP &lt; 90 mm Hg or diastolic BP &lt; 60 mm Hg, respiratory rate &gt; 24 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation &lt; 90%). The developed score remained significantly associated with a higher risk-adjusted rate of death. Patients with a score &ge; 2 (one major criterion or two minor criteria) had a sixfold-greater risk-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death (HR, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 13.1).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Four criteria of instability on discharge seem to be related to the mortality rate after discharge, but each of the factors must be weighed differently. The resulting score is a simple alternative that can be used by clinicians in the discharge process.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capelastegui, A., Espana, P. P., Bilbao, A., Martinez-Vazquez, M., Gorordo, I., Oribe, M., Urrutia, I., Quintana, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pneumonia: Criteria for Patient Instability on Hospital Discharge]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>600</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>595</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INFECTION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/601?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinically Significant Interstitial Lung Disease in Limited Scleroderma: Histopathology, Clinical Features, and Survival]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/601?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Purpose:</I></st>
<p>To evaluate the pathologic patterns, clinical features, and survival among subjects with scleroderma (<I>ie</I>, systemic sclerosis [SSc]) and clinically significant interstitial lung disease (ILD) evaluated at an ILD center.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study of all SSc patients who had been referred for further evaluation of ILD and had undergone surgical lung biopsy. Clinical data were abstracted by review of the medical record, and lung biopsy specimens were reviewed and classified according to current pathologic criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>All patients presented with significant respiratory symptoms. Twenty-two of 27 subjects had surgical lung biopsy-proven ILD, and 5 subjects had miscellaneous non-ILD patterns. Of those subjects with ILD, 64% (14 of 22 subjects) had a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pathologic pattern (fibrotic NSIP, 13 subjects; cellular NSIP, 1 subject), and 36% (8 of 22 subjects) had the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. Subjects with NSIP were younger (median age, 42 vs 58 years, respectively; p = 0.003), but no differences were noted in pulmonary physiology (FVC: NSIP group, 52% predicted; UIP group, 65% predicted; p = 0.22; diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide: NSIP group, 40% predicted; UIP group, 42% predicted; p = 1.0). All patients had limited skin involvement. The Scl-70 antibody was absent among those assessed (NSIP group, 0 of 10 subjects; UIP group, 0 of 7 subjects). All patients were treated with cytotoxic therapy. The median survival time for those with NSIP was 15.3 years (5,596 days) compared with 3 years (1,084 days) for those with UIP (p = 0.07 [log-rank test]).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>In SSc patients with limited cutaneous disease and clinically significant ILD, fibrotic NSIP and UIP are the predominant pathologic patterns. Those with the UIP pattern of disease had a trend toward shorter survival time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fischer, A., Swigris, J. J., Groshong, S. D., Cool, C. D., Sahin, H., Lynch, D. A., Curran-Everett, D., Gillis, J. Z., Meehan, R. T., Brown, K. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinically Significant Interstitial Lung Disease in Limited Scleroderma: Histopathology, Clinical Features, and Survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>605</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>601</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advances in Neutrophil Biology: Clinical Implications]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many lung diseases are characterized by neutrophil-dominated inflammation; therefore, an understanding of neutrophil function is of considerable importance to respiratory physicians. This review will focus on recent advances in our understanding of how neutrophils are produced, how these cells leave the circulation, the molecular events regulating neutrophil activation and, ultimately, how these cells die and are removed. The neutrophil is now recognized as a highly versatile and sophisticated cell with significant synthetic capacity and an important role in linking the innate and adaptive arms of the immune response. One of the key challenges in conditions such as COPD, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, and certain forms of asthma is how to manipulate neutrophil function in a way that does not compromise antibacterial and antifungal capacity. The possession by neutrophils of a unique repertoire of surface receptors and signaling proteins may make such targeted therapy possible.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowburn, A. S., Condliffe, A. M., Farahi, N., Summers, C., Chilvers, E. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Translating Basic Research into Clinical Practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advances in Neutrophil Biology: Clinical Implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>612</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TRANSLATING BASIC RESEARCH INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/613?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Update in the Understanding of Respiratory Limitations to Exercise Performance in Fit, Active Adults]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/613?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This review addresses three types of causes of respiratory system limitations to O<SUB>2</SUB> transport and exercise performance that are experienced by significant numbers of active, highly fit younger and older adults. First, flow limitation in intrathoracic airways may occur during exercise because of narrowed, hyperactive airways or secondary to excessive ventilatory demands superimposed on a normal maximum flow-volume envelope. Narrowing of the extrathoracic, upper airway also occurs in some athletes at very high flow rates during heavy exercise. Examination of the breath-by-breath tidal flow-volume loop during exercise is key to a noninvasive diagnosis of flow limitation and to differentiation between intrathoracic and extrathoracic airway narrowing. Second exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia occurs secondary to an excessively widened alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference. This inefficient gas exchange may be attributable in part to small intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts of deoxygenated mixed venous blood during exercise. The existence of these shunts at rest and during exercise may be determined by using saline solution contrast echocardiography. Finally, fatigue of the respiratory muscles resulting from sustained, high-intensity exercise and the resultant vasoconstrictor effects on limb muscle vasculature will also compromise O<SUB>2</SUB> transport and performance. Exercise in the hypoxic environments of even moderately high alitudes will greatly exacerbate the negative influences of these respiratory system limitations to exercise performance, especially in highly fit individuals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dempsey, J. A., McKenzie, D. C., Haverkamp, H. C., Eldridge, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Recent Advances in Chest Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2730</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Update in the Understanding of Respiratory Limitations to Exercise Performance in Fit, Active Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>622</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>613</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>RECENT ADVANCES IN CHEST MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Many "Small COPDs": COPD Should Be an Orphan Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>COPD is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality. Perhaps paradoxically, COPD also should be an orphan disease. Importantly, this could advance the development of treatments for COPD. There are two criteria for orphan status in the United States. Most widely known is the criterion of &lt; 200,000 affected individuals; however, secondarily, is the impossibility for development costs to be recovered during the patent life of a product. COPD should qualify for the first criterion if the various conditions that comprise COPD are regarded separately. The subphenotyping of COPD into separate groups based on mechanism sets the stage for the rational development of therapeutics. In addition, many candidate treatments may alter the natural history of COPD. Testing them, however, will require large studies for a duration that will compromise the commercial life of any resulting product. Orphan status, therefore, could facilitate the development of treatments for both phenotypic subsets of COPD patients as well as aid the development of agents to alter the natural history of the disease. Post-drug approval regulations could require that agents approved under the orphan provisions are prospectively monitored, assuring that rigorous longitudinal data are generated. This approach could encourage the pharmaceutical industry to stratify studies based on a more detailed characterization of study subjects at baseline, thus approaching "many small COPDs" instead of a single large and heterogeneous COPD. This strategy may help to address the increasing burden that COPD presents and for which no novel clinical class of treatment has been introduced for 30 years.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rennard, S. I., Vestbo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Many "Small COPDs": COPD Should Be an Orphan Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>627</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Asthma Management by Monitoring Sputum Neutrophil Count]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We report the utility of quantitative cell counts in sputum in monitoring therapy of a patient with poorly controlled asthma. Recurrent neutrophilic bronchitis without an eosinophilic bronchitis led to the identification of <I>Chlamydophila pneumoniae</I> as the cause of bronchitis and asthma exacerbation. Serial examination of blood and sputum by polymerase chain reaction for C <I>pneumoniae</I> helped to prevent exacerbations by prophylactic antibiotic therapy, reduce the dose of prednisone and inhaled corticosteroids, and improve asthma control.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pallan, S., Mahony, J. B., O'Byrne, P. M., Nair, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Asthma Management by Monitoring Sputum Neutrophil Count]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>630</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SELECTED REPORTS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utility of Virtual Bronchoscopy-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Report of Two Cases]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology that usually affects the lungs. Although flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy with transbronchial lung biopsy (TBBx) has a high diagnostic yield in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, variously ranging from 40 to 90%, more invasive procedures often prove necessary. We report two cases of successful diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis using a new technique that may increase the accuracy of TBBx. Previously described for diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, this technique relies on real-time virtual bronchoscopic guidance to biopsy preselected peripheral areas of the lung preferentially affected by the disease using a pediatric bronchoscope. In each case, while procedures were performed under direct CT guidance allowing precise confirmation of the tip of the biopsy catheter, it is anticipated that this technique will be primarily used as a guide to bronchoscopic biopsies without the need for direct CT guidance, thus increasing routine utilization of multidetector low-dose high-resolution CT to improve histologic diagnosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godoy, M. C. B., Ost, D., Geiger, B., Novak, C., Nonaka, D., Vlahos, I., Naidich, D. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utility of Virtual Bronchoscopy-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Report of Two Cases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>636</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SELECTED REPORTS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/637?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 26-Year-Old Pregnant Woman With Fatigue and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/637?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sagheer, F., Venkata, C., Venkateshiah, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary and Critical Care Pearls]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 26-Year-Old Pregnant Woman With Fatigue and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>639</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>637</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/640?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 29-Year-Old Woman With a Remote History of Osteosarcoma and Positron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleurally Based Masses]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/640?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdalla, A. M. H., White, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary and Critical Care Pearls]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 29-Year-Old Woman With a Remote History of Osteosarcoma and Positron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleurally Based Masses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>643</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>640</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Few Good Men: A Marine With Hemoptysis and Diarrhea]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayes, D. H., Guerrero, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary and Critical Care Pearls]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2834</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Few Good Men: A Marine With Hemoptysis and Diarrhea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>647</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 28-Year-Old Man With a Mediastinal Mass]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matwiyoff, G. N., Bradshaw, D. A., Hildebrandt, K. H., Campenot, J. F., Coletta, J. M., Coyle, W. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chest Imaging and Pathology for Clinicians]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-1509</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 28-Year-Old Man With a Mediastinal Mass]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>652</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CHEST IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY FOR CLINICIANS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sleep Loss and Sleepiness: Current Issues]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Awareness of the consequences of sleep loss and its implications for public health and safety is increasing. Sleep loss has been shown to generally impair the entire spectrum of mental abilities, ranging from simple psychomotor performance to executive mental functions. Sleep loss may also impact metabolism in a manner that contributes to obesity and its attendant health consequences. Although objective measures of alertness and performance remain degraded, individuals subjectively habituate to chronic partial sleep loss (<I>eg</I>, sleep restriction), and recovery from this type of sleep loss is slow, factors that may help to explain the observation that many individuals in the general population are chronically sleep restricted. Individual differences in habitual sleep duration appear to be a trait-like characteristic that is determined by several factors, including genetic polymorphisms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balkin, T. J., Rupp, T., Picchioni, D., Wesensten, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Contemporary Reviews in Sleep Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sleep Loss and Sleepiness: Current Issues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>660</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CONTEMPORARY REVIEWS IN SLEEP MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/661?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of International Standards for Medical Communications in English]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/661?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebek-Nagy, G., Warta, V., Barron, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Writing Tip of the Month]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of International Standards for Medical Communications in English]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>662</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>661</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEDICAL WRITING TIP OF THE MONTH</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity: Clinical Implications, Coding, and Documentation]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The test for the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) has been available for nearly 100 years for research and clinical purposes. The single-breath method is used almost exclusively in the United States It has been available in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for &gt; 50 years. DLCO has great value in evaluating patients with lung diseases. Guidelines to standardize DLCO have been published by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society to reduce the interlaboratory variability that has existed. One code, 94720, should be reported for the billing for DLCO. Another code, 94725, the membrane diffusing capacity, exists for the measurement of the membrane and blood components of the DLCO. Currently, no clinical indications exist for the use of the membrane diffusing capacity. The finding that the number of tests in the Medicare population coded with 94725 has increased by &gt; 1,000% from 2000 to 2005 is quite surprising. This rate is 14-times higher than the rate of increase in the utilization of 94720 over the same period. The possible reasons for these increases are discussed, but the most likely explanation is the financial gain derived from coding 94725. It is proposed that coding and billing of 94725 be stopped until the clinical indications for membrane diffusing capacity have been established. Those who code and bill for 94725 must be prepared to justify the use of this code to Medicare and third-party payers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plummer, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Topics in Practice Management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-1771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity: Clinical Implications, Coding, and Documentation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>667</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TOPICS IN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/668?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why I Stole My Own X-Rays]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/668?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albers, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pectoriloquy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why I Stole My Own X-Rays]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>668</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>668</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PECTORILOQUY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/669?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Asthma]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/669?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ablon, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pectoriloquy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0313</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Asthma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>669</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>669</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PECTORILOQUY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dramatic Functional Improvement Following Bariatric Surgery in a Patient With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Morbid Obesity]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz-Lobato, S., Navarro, J. G., Perez-Rodriguez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dramatic Functional Improvement Following Bariatric Surgery in a Patient With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Morbid Obesity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>670</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/670-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathier, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>671</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Potential Confounders in the "Influence of Gender on the Outcome of Severe Sepsis" Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, N. K., Singh, V. K., Guleria, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Potential Confounders in the "Influence of Gender on the Outcome of Severe Sepsis" Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>671</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>671</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/671-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrie, C., Schwebel, C., Timsit, J.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1434</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>672</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>671</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Please Lead, But Don't Mislead]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Detterbeck, F. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0973</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Please Lead, But Don't Mislead]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>672</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>672</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/672-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernst, A., Herth, F. J. F., Eberhardt, R., Krasnik, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>673</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>672</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/673?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-Sized-Based Descriptors in Staging of Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/673?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez-Encuentra, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0893</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-Sized-Based Descriptors in Staging of Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>674</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>673</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/674?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/3/674?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ou, S.-H. I., Zell, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>674</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>674</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatable With Medical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hill, N. S., Preston, I. R., Roberts, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatable With Medical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Add, or Not To Add an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Moderate COPD: That Is the Question]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cazzola, M., Matera, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0855</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Add, or Not To Add an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Moderate COPD: That Is the Question]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/225?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Seven Deadly Sins of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/225?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morrow, L. E., Shorr, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0860</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Seven Deadly Sins of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/226?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptom Measurement]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/226?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, P. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptom Measurement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogers, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>228</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/229?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term Use of Sildenafil in Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/229?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> There are currently no licensed medical therapies for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> In this double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, 19 subjects with inoperable CTEPH were randomly assigned to sildenafil or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was change in 6-min walking distance (6MWD). Secondary end points included changes in World Health Organization (WHO) class, cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, quality of life (QOL) scores, and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). All subjects were transferred to open-label sildenafil at the end of the study and offered repeat assessment at 12 months.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to change in exercise capacity. However significant improvements were seen in WHO class and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Seventeen subjects were eligible for reassessment at 12 months and demonstrated significant improvements in 6MWD, activity and symptom components of QOL, cardiac index, PVR, and NT-proBNP.</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> Although this pilot study was insufficiently powered to test the primary end point, it did suggest beneficial effects in favor of sildenafil in several secondary end points at both 3 months and 12 months. Further larger-scale trials of sildenafil in inoperable CTEPH are required to confirm these findings and potentially increase the treatment options available for this devastating disease.</p>
<p><I>Trial registration:</I> The study protocol was registered with the UK National Research Register database (publication ID N0542136603).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suntharalingam, J., Treacy, C. M., Doughty, N. J., Goldsmith, K., Soon, E., Toshner, M. R., Sheares, K. K., Hughes, R., Morrell, N. W., Pepke-Zaba, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term Use of Sildenafil in Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY EMBOLISM</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Neurosurgery: A Metaanalysis]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication of neurosurgery. Current guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis in this setting with either unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). We conducted a systematic review asking, "Among patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, how safe and effective is the prophylactic use of heparin and mechanical devices?"</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> We searched the medical literature to identify prospective trials reporting on VTE prevention (either mechanical or pharmacologic). The rates of VTE and bleeding were our primary end points and were pooled using a random-effects model.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> We identified 30 studies reporting on 7,779 patients. There were 18 randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies. The results of pooled relative risks (RRs) showed LMWH and intermittent compression devices (ICDs) to be effective in reducing the rate of deep vein thrombosis (LMWH: RR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.81; ICD: RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78). Similar results were seen when pooled rates from all 30 trials were analyzed. In head-to-head trials, there was no statistical difference in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between therapy with LMWH and nonpharmacologic methods (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 0.64 to 6.09). The pooled rates of ICH and minor bleeding were generally higher with heparin therapy than with non&ndash;heparin-based prophylactic modalities.</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> In a mixed neurosurgical population, LMWH and ICDs are both effective in the prevention of VTE. Sensitivity analyses have suggested that isolated high-risk groups, such as those with patients undergoing craniotomy for neoplasm, may benefit from a combination of prophylactic methods, suggesting the need for a more individualized approach to these patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collen, J. F., Jackson, J. L., Shorr, A. F., Moores, L. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Neurosurgery: A Metaanalysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY EMBOLISM</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catheter-Directed Embolectomy, Fragmentation, and Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism After Failure of Systemic Thrombolysis]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Purpose:</I> The standard medical management for patients <I>in extremis</I> from massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is systemic thrombolysis, but the utility of this treatment relative to catheter-directed intervention (CDI) is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of CDI as part of a treatment algorithm for life-threatening PE.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> A retrospective review was performed on 70 consecutive patients with suspected acute PE over a 10-year period (from 1997 to 2006) who had been referred for pulmonary angiography and/or intervention. The criteria for study inclusion were patients who received CDI due to angiographically confirmed massive PE and hemodynamic shock (shock index, &ge; 0.9). CDI involved suction embolectomy and fragmentation with or without catheter thrombolysis.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> Twelve patients were treated with CDI. There were seven men and five women (mean age, 56 years; age range, 21 to 80 years). Seven patients (58%) were referred for CDI after failing systemic infusion with 100 mg of tissue plasminogen activator, and five patients (42%) had contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. Catheter-directed fragmentation and embolectomy were performed in all patients (100%). Additionally, catheter-guided thrombolysis was performed in eight patients (67%). Technical success was achieved in 12 of 12 cases (100%). There were no major procedural complications (0%). Significant hemodynamic improvement (shock index, &lt; 0.9) was observed in 10 of 12 cases (83%). The remaining two patients (17%) died secondary to cardiac arrest within 24 h. Ten of 12 patients (83%) survived and remained stable until hospital discharge (mean duration, 20 days; range, 3 to 51 days).</p>
<p><I>Conclusion:</I> In the setting of hemodynamic shock from massive PE, CDI is potentially a life-saving treatment for patients who have not responded to or cannot tolerate systemic thrombolysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuo, W. T., van den Bosch, M. A. A. J., Hofmann, L. V., Louie, J. D., Kothary, N., Sze, D. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2846</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catheter-Directed Embolectomy, Fragmentation, and Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism After Failure of Systemic Thrombolysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY EMBOLISM</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of a Combination of Tiotropium Plus Formoterol to Salmeterol Plus Fluticasone in Moderate COPD]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD to compare lung function improvements of tiotropium, 18 &micro;g qd, plus formoterol, 12 &micro;g bid, to salmeterol, 50 &micro;g bid, plus fluticasone, 500 &micro;g bid.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> Following a screening visit, subjects entered a run-in period in which they received regular ipratropium. At randomization, patients were assigned to either tiotropium plus formoterol or salmeterol plus fluticasone. After 6 weeks of treatment, a 12-h lung function profile was obtained. The coprimary end points were FEV<SUB>1</SUB> area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 h (AUC<SUB>0&ndash;12</SUB>) and peak FEV<SUB>1</SUB>.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> A total of 729 patients were screened, and 605 patients were randomized and treated. A total of 592 patients (baseline FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, 1.32 &plusmn; 0.43 L/min [&plusmn;SD]) were included in the analysis. After 6 weeks, the 12-h lung function profiles in the group receiving tiotropium plus formoterol were superior to those in the group receiving salmeterol plus fluticasone (mean difference in FEV<SUB>1</SUB> AUC<SUB>0&ndash;12</SUB>, 78 mL [p = 0.0006]; mean difference in FVC AUC<SUB>0&ndash;12</SUB>, 173 mL, p &lt; 0.0001). Also, peak responses were in favor of tiotropium plus formoterol (difference in peak FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, 103 mL [p &lt; 0.0001]; difference in peak FVC, 214 mL [p &lt; 0.0001]), as were FEV<SUB>1</SUB> and FVC at each individual time point after dose (p &lt; 0.05). Predose FVC was significantly higher with the bronchodilator combination, while predose FEV<SUB>1</SUB> and rescue medication use did not differ significantly between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated.</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> Tiotropium plus formoterol was superior in lung function over the day compared to salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with moderate COPD. Long-term studies in patients with severe COPD are warranted to assess the relative efficacy of different treatment combinations.</p>
<p><I>Trial registration:</I> Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00239421.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabe, K. F., Timmer, W., Sagkriotis, A., Viel, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of a Combination of Tiotropium Plus Formoterol to Salmeterol Plus Fluticasone in Moderate COPD]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Plasma Pro-Adrenomedullin But Not Plasma Pro-Endothelin Predicts Survival in Exacerbations of COPD]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Plasma endothelin and adrenomedullin are increased in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, hypoxia, and pulmonary infections, conditions that predict survival in patients with COPD. We investigated whether plasma pro-endothelin-1 (proET-1) and/or pro-adrenomedullin (proADM) on admission to the hospital for acute exacerbation predict survival in patients with COPD.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> We examined 167 patients who had been admitted to the hospital for acute exacerbation, and we followed them up for 2 years. We measured plasma C-terminal (CT) proET-1 and mid-regional (MR) proADM on hospital admission, after 14 to 18 days, and after 6 months. In addition to plasma CT proET-1 and MR proADM, we assessed with Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses the predictive value of clinical, functional, and laboratory parameters on 2-year survival. We analyzed the time to death by Kaplan-Meier curves.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> Compared to recovery and stable state, CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM were significantly increased on hospital admission (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). MR-proADM, but not CT-proET-1, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (p = 0.049) and independently predicted 2-year survival (p = 0.017). ProADM plasma levels &gt; 0.84 nmol/L on hospital admission increased the mortality risk within 2 years from 13 to 32% (p = 0.004). By contrast, age (p = 0.779), Charlson comorbidity score (p = 0.971), body mass index (p = 0.802), FEV<SUB>1</SUB> percent predicted (p = 0.741), PA<scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB> (p = 0.744), PA<scp>co</scp><SUB>2</SUB> (p = 0.284), leukocyte counts (p = 0.333), C-reactive protein (p = 0.772), procalcitonin (p = 0.069), pulmonary arterial hypertension (p = 0.971), and CT-proET-1 (p = 0.223) were not independently associated with 2-year survival.</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> This study shows that plasma proADM but not plasma proET-1 on admission to the hospital for acute exacerbation independently predicts survival, thus suggesting that this biomarker could be used to predict prognosis in patients with COPD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stolz, D., Christ-Crain, M., Morgenthaler, N. G., Miedinger, D., Leuppi, J., Muller, C., Bingisser, R., Struck, J., Muller, B., Tamm, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Plasma Pro-Adrenomedullin But Not Plasma Pro-Endothelin Predicts Survival in Exacerbations of COPD]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are Patients With COPD More Active After Pulmonary Rehabilitation?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Despite a variety of benefits brought by pulmonary rehabilitation to patients with COPD, it is unclear whether these patients are more active during daily life after the program.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> Physical activities in daily life (activity monitoring), pulmonary function (spirometry), exercise capacity (incremental cycle-ergometer testing and 6-min walk distance testing), muscle force (quadriceps and handgrip force, and inspiratory and expiratory maximal pressures), quality of life (chronic respiratory disease questionnaire), and functional status (pulmonary functional status and dyspnea questionnaire-modified version) were assessed at baseline, after 3 months of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, and at the end of a 6-month multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in 29 patients (mean [&plusmn; SD] age, 67 &plusmn; 8 years; FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, 46 &plusmn; 16% predicted).</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> Exercise capacity, muscle force, quality of life, and functional status improved significantly after 3 months of pulmonary rehabilitation (all p &lt; 0.05), with further improvements in muscle force, functional status, and quality of life at 6 months. Movement intensity during walking improved significantly after 3 months (p = 0.046) with further improvements after 6 months (p = 0.0002). Walking time in daily life did not improve significantly at 3 months (mean improvement, 7 &plusmn; 35%; p = 0.21), but only after 6 months (mean improvement, 20 &plusmn; 36%; p = 0.008). No significant changes occurred in other activities or in the pattern of the time spent walking in daily life. Changes in dyspnea after the program were significantly related to changes in walking time in daily life (<I>r</I> = 0.43; p = 0.02).</p>
<p><I>Conclusion:</I> If one aims at changing physical activity habits in the daily life of COPD patients, the contribution of long-lasting programs might be important.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pitta, F., Troosters, T., Probst, V. S., Langer, D., Decramer, M., Gosselink, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are Patients With COPD More Active After Pulmonary Rehabilitation?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of 30-Day Mortality and Hospital Costs in Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Attributed to Potentially Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Objective:</I> To identify predictors of 30-day mortality and hospital costs in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) attributed to potentially antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (PARGNB) [<I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I>, Acinetobacter species, and <I>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</I>].</p>
<p><I>Design:</I> A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study.</p>
<p><I>Setting:</I> Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,200-bed urban teaching hospital.</p>
<p><I>Patients:</I> Adult patients requiring hospitalization with microbiologically confirmed VAP attributed to PARGNB.</p>
<p><I>Interventions:</I> Retrospective data collection from automated hospital, microbiology, and pharmacy databases.</p>
<p><I>Measurements and main results:</I> Seventy-six patients with VAP attributed to PARGNB were identified over a 5-year period. Nineteen patients (25.0%) died during hospitalization. Patients receiving their first dose of appropriate antibiotic therapy within 24 h of BAL sampling had a statistically lower 30-day mortality rate compared to patients receiving the first dose of appropriate therapy &gt;24 h after BAL (17.2% vs 50.0%; p = 0.005). VAP due to Acinetobacter species was most often initially treated with an inappropriate antibiotic regimen, followed by <I>S maltophilia</I> and <I>P aeruginosa</I> (66.7% vs 33.3% vs 17.2%; p = 0.017). Overall, total hospitalization costs were statistically similar in patients initially treated with an inappropriate antibiotic regimen compared to an appropriate regimen ($68,597 &plusmn; $55,466 vs $86,644 &plusmn; $64,433; p = 0.390).</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> These data suggest that inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy of microbiologically confirmed VAP attributed to PARGNB is associated with greater 30-day mortality. High rates of VAP attributed to antibiotic-resistant bacteria (<I>eg</I>, Acinetobacter species) may require changes in the local empiric antibiotic treatment of VAP in order to optimize the prescription of appropriate initial therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kollef, K. E., Schramm, G. E., Wills, A. R., Reichley, R. M., Micek, S. T., Kollef, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of 30-Day Mortality and Hospital Costs in Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Attributed to Potentially Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracheostomy Tube Malposition in Patients Admitted to a Respiratory Acute Care Unit Following Prolonged Ventilation]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Tracheostomy tube malposition is a barrier to weaning from mechanical ventilation. We determined the incidence of tracheostomy tube malposition, identified the associated risk factors, and examined the effect of malposition on clinical outcomes.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> We performed a retrospective study on 403 consecutive patients with a tracheostomy who had been admitted to an acute care unit specializing in weaning from mechanical ventilation between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2005. Bronchoscopy reports were reviewed for evidence of tracheostomy tube malposition (<I>ie</I>, &gt; 50% occlusion of lumen by tissue). The main outcome parameters were the incidence of tracheostomy tube malposition; demographic, clinical, and tracheostomy-related factors associated with malposition; clinical response to correct the malposition; the duration of mechanical ventilation; the length of hospital stay; and mortality.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> Malpositioned tracheostomy tubes were identified in 40 of 403 patients (10%). The subspecialty of the surgical service physicians who performed the tracheostomy was most strongly associated with malposition. Thoracic and general surgeons were equally likely to have their patients associated with a malpositioned tracheostomy tube, while other subspecialty surgeons were more likely (odds ratio, 6.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.82 to 22.68; p = 0.004). Malpositioned tracheostomy tubes were changed in 80% of cases. Malposition was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation posttracheostomy (median duration, 25 vs 15 d; p = 0.009), but not with increased hospital length of stay or mortality.</p>
<p><I>Conclusion:</I> Tracheostomy tube malposition appears to be a common and important complication in patients who are being weaned from mechanical ventilation. Surgical expertise may be an important factor that impacts this complication.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmidt, U., Hess, D., Kwo, J., Lagambina, S., Gettings, E., Khandwala, F., Bigatello, L. M., Stelfox, H. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracheostomy Tube Malposition in Patients Admitted to a Respiratory Acute Care Unit Following Prolonged Ventilation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>294</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Cough Across Different Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Comparison of Two Cough-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Cough is a prominent symptom across a range of common chronic respiratory diseases and impacts considerably on patient health status.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> We undertook a cross-sectional comparison of scores from two cough-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ), together with a generic HRQoL measure, the EuroQol. Questionnaires were administered to and spirometry performed on 147 outpatients with chronic cough (n = 83), COPD (n = 18), asthma (n = 20), and bronchiectasis (n = 26).</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> There was no significant difference in the LCQ and CQLQ total scores between groups (p = 0.24 and p = 0.26, respectively). Exploratory analyses of questionnaire subdomains revealed differences in psychosocial issues and functional impairment between the four groups (p = 0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). CQLQ scores indicated that chronic coughers have more psychosocial issues than patients with bronchiectasis (p = 0.03) but less functional impairment than COPD patients (p = 0.04). There was a significant difference in generic health status across the four disease groups (p = 0.04), with poorest health status in COPD patients. A significant inverse correlation was observed between CQLQ and LCQ in each disease group (chronic cough <I>r</I> = &ndash; 0.56, p &lt; 0.001; COPD <I>r</I> = &ndash; 0.49, p = 0.04; asthma <I>r</I> = &ndash; 0.94, p &lt; 0.001; and bronchiectasis <I>r</I> = &ndash; 0.88, p &lt; 0.001). There was no correlation between cough questionnaire scores and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> in any group, although a significant correlation between EuroQol visual analog scale component and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> (<I>r</I> = 0.639, p = 0.004) was observed in COPD patients.</p>
<p><I>Conclusion:</I> Cough adversely affects health status across a range of common respiratory diseases. The LCQ and CQLQ can each provide important additional information concerning the impact of cough.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polley, L., Yaman, N., Heaney, L., Cardwell, C., Murtagh, E., Ramsey, J., MacMahon, J., Costello, R. W., McGarvey, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-0141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Cough Across Different Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Comparison of Two Cough-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COUGH</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Is the Burden of Chronic Cough for Families?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> The burden of children&rsquo;s chronic cough to parents is largely unknown. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to determine the burden of chronic cough using a purposely designed questionnaire, and (2) to evaluate psychological (child&rsquo;s anxiety and parental emotional distress) and other influences on the reported burden of cough.</p>
<p><I>Methods:</I> Parents of children newly referred for chronic cough completed three questionnaires (Spence anxiety scale; depression, anxiety, and stress 21-item scale [DASS]; and burden of cough questionnaire) at enrollment. The last 79 parents also completed these questionnaires at follow-up.</p>
<p><I>Results:</I> Median age of the 190 children recruited was 2.6 years. The number of medical consultations for coughing illness in the last 12 months was high: &gt; 80% of children had &ge; 5 doctor visits and 53% had &gt; 10 visits. At presentation, burden scores correlated to parental DASS scores when their child was coughing. Stress was the largest contributor to parents&rsquo; emotional distress. Parental anxiety and depression scores were within published norms. Scores on all three DASS subscales reduced significantly when the children ceased coughing. At follow-up, the reduction in burden scores was significantly higher in the "ceased coughing" group (n = 49) compared to the "still coughing" group (n = 32).</p>
<p><I>Conclusions:</I> Chronic cough in children is associated with a high burden of recurrent doctor visits, parental stress, and worries that resolve when cough ceases. Parents of children with chronic cough did not have above-average anxiety or depression levels. This study highlights the need to improve the management of children with chronic cough, including clinicians being cognizant of the emotional distress of the parents.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marchant, J. M., Newcombe, P. A., Juniper, E. F., Sheffield, J. K., Stathis, S. L., Chang, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Is the Burden of Chronic Cough for Families?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COUGH</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Restoration of Cough Reflex in Lung Transplant Recipients]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/2/310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>Background:</I> Lung transplantation involve